Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659339
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: if physics is dead |
| Date | 2024-12-04 22:47 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <67514C87.5B20@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <675142A7.152F@ix.netcom.com> |
The Starmaker wrote: > > then engineering would be dead... > > isn't that right? i mean, it appears to me that someone here claims physics is dead and they happen to be in engineering. Obviously, they don't understand the relation of physics to engineering. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:05 -0800
Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:47 -0800
Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 13:20 -0800
Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 10:03 -0800
Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-08 12:58 -0800
Re: if physics is dead bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-06 15:43 +0000
Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-06 16:28 -0800
csiph-web