Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659352

Re: if physics is dead

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: if physics is dead
Date	2024-12-05 13:20 -0800
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<67521909.1CC9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<675142A7.152F@ix.netcom.com> <67514C87.5B20@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > then engineering would be dead...
> >
> > isn't that right?
> 
> i mean, it appears to me
> that someone here claims
> physics is dead and
> they happen to be in
> engineering.
> 
> Obviously, they don't understand
> the relation of physics to
> engineering.
> 


Here is one example...

the engineers send rocketships to space, and it blows up
because the engineers don't know the physics.


if something gets too cold, it stops working.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:05 -0800
  Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:47 -0800
    Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 13:20 -0800
      Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 10:03 -0800
        Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-08 12:58 -0800
  Re: if physics is dead bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-06 15:43 +0000
    Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-06 16:28 -0800

csiph-web