Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: if physics is dead
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 13:20:09 -0800
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <67521909.1CC9@ix.netcom.com>
References: <675142A7.152F@ix.netcom.com> <67514C87.5B20@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 22:20:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5166ceaf6b80d0afe97cf0794c4901df"; logging-data="1948879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zp5BRwAG2Ts55wxhUdFOD5epgzjoefFQ="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lt9mnO+DF6yOQdobTg1pVyXmIlE=
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241205-4, 12/05/2024), Outbound message
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:659352

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > then engineering would be dead...
> >
> > isn't that right?
> 
> i mean, it appears to me
> that someone here claims
> physics is dead and
> they happen to be in
> engineering.
> 
> Obviously, they don't understand
> the relation of physics to
> engineering.
> 


Here is one example...

the engineers send rocketships to space, and it blows up
because the engineers don't know the physics.


if something gets too cold, it stops working.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.