Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'

From	cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'
Date	2026-05-05 23:06 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<10tdt61$65u$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	<10su8cn$am9i$1@dont-email.me> <10tdfnn$lpil$1@dont-email.me> <10tdm8p$8q4$1@reader1.panix.com> <10tdr18$p73j$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <10tdr18$p73j$1@dont-email.me>, Bart  <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>On 05/05/2026 22:08, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <10tdfnn$lpil$1@dont-email.me>, Bart  <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2026 17:34, Dan Cross wrote:
>
>>> Is C higher level than them, or lower level? It seems to be getting
>>> above itself. C is also supposed to be famous for being as low level as
>>> you can get before you hit assembly.
>> 
>> C is not a low-level language:
>> https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3212479
>> 
>> C's evolution over time has seen it increasingly move away from
>> a "low-level, close to the machine" language and to something
>> that is a de-facto high-level language, just without all the
>> nice features of languages that have been defined subsequently.
>> This does not reflect well on C.
>
>So which HLL is lower level than C now?

Did you not read the following paragraph, that you also quoted?

>> Other than that, your question is not relevant, and is poorly
>> worded: objective criteria by which one might say whether a
>> language is "higher-level" or "lower-level" than "them" is vague
>> at best.

^^^ See here.

>>>>> So to me this makes sense as a default behaviour that you can rely on,
>>>>> without anyone needing to use special compiler options to create their
>>>>
>>>> It may make sense to you, but I've seen no evidence that you
>>>> understand the matter particularly well.  Indeed, I see quite a
>>>> bit of evidence for the opposite.  Nevermind the larger context.
>>>
>>> I wrote my first compiler for a machine-oriented language in 1980. I've
>>> been developing a series of systems languages and their compilers since
>>> 1981.
>> 
>> Frankly, I don't care.  Appeals to authority, or even worse,
>> appeals to length of experience, do not work on me and usually
>> have the opposite effect.
>
>
>>> So that gives me an unusual perspective.
>> 
>> Lots of people write toy compilers and design simple derivative
>> langauges for fun; that does not make them experts.
>
>I've done it over decades and used them to write commercial 
>applications. The languages were in-house and now are personal ones. You 
>won't know of them unless you were a user of my applications.

Ah, so in other words, you wrote a compiler for a language that
you used to write applications that you then sold, all by
yourself.

Congratulations on being able to earn a living that way, and I
mean that sincerely.  But that in no way makes you an expert on
programming languages or compiler design..

>As I said, I tried switching to C at one point, but decided it was 
>rubbish and persevered with mine.

That's cute, but given that you're not an expert, you're not
really in a position to judge.

>> Outside of this news group, I've never heard of you, never heard
>> of any of those languages, and never seen any of your compilers.
>
>OK, I've never heard of you either.

The vast majority of people in this world have not, either.

>And since we're being frank, I've seriously considered whether the C 
>language was a joke that couple of stoned students submitted as an 
>assignment. If it was, then nobody has let on yet.

Then you've admitted that your opinion is not at all valuable,
as you clearly don't know anything about the history of the
language, or the people involved, or their qualifications, as
demonstrated by their track records and the publicly inspectible
artifacts that they produced.

So why, again, should anyone care what you have to say about the
matter?

>> I think it is fair to say that you have had no measurable impact
>> on the field.
>
>OK. And it is fair to say that C remains a crappy language, no matter 
>how successful.

Did I say it was a great language?  Why are you trying to
convince me?

>Example:
>
>[tl;dr: bad code that demonstrates lack of understanding]
>
>I could go on all day with more jaw-dropping stuff. Funnily enough, none 
>of this is possible in my systems language, you know, the amateur one 
>that is nowhere near as good as the 'professional' C language that 
>underpins most computer systems (how scary is that!).

That's nice.  Too bad no one other than you has ever heard of
your "systems language".

>> So your perspective is no more "unusual", and certainly not more
>> relevant, than any other relatively long-time programmer's.
>
>I disagree.

I'm sure you do disagree.  That doesn't really change reality,
though.  Your demonstrated lack of understanding of even the
most basic aspects of the topics at hand show that your opinion
is not worth consideration.

>Very few programmers devise their own languages, implement 
>them,

Actually, lots do.

>and use them almost exclusively throughout the careers.

This is true, but it is not the flex that you think that it is.
Hint: most programmers grow up and come to their senses.

>And 
>probably even fewer who also designed and built their own hardware.

LOL.  Ok.

>>> However its UBs and its numerous quirks are a big turn-off. I don't want
>>> an intermediate language that 'gets in the way', has a mind of its own,
>>> and is liable to give me unexpected surprises; just give me that fast
>>> code for that platform I can't yet support directly!
>> 
>> Case in point: If you, as a self-professed compiler implementer
>> and language designer, cannot even negotiate understanding what
>> the term, "Undefined Behavior" means in the context of C,
>
>I simply don't agree with it in the context being discussed. It is an 
>unnecessary complication that I don't want to bother my head about.

See the previous point.

>> then I
>> do not think you are competent to build a professional-quality
>> compiler or serious programming language.
>
>My language worked well enough for me to retire in 1999.

...and?

>> There are valid objections to the prevelance of UB in C, but
>> this is not one of them.
>
>I think it is. I haven't had it in any of my languages since 1981; what 
>have I missed? (That is, UB for things that are well-defined in my 
>languages and their targets.)

You don't even have a good handle on what UB _is_.  Maybe you
should work on that before commenting about what you "think".

>>> So, yeah, you could say I have strong opinions about it. The end result
>>> is that I now avoid a C target as much as possible.
>> 
>> Ok.  I don't think anyone other than you really cares about what
>> you target with a toy compiler, and there is no reason why your
>> opinion should be valued over anyone else's: rather the opposite
>> in fact.
>
>Well, OK. I didn't actually expect C to change right now because of a 
>thread on an obscure, dying forum.
>
>That's fine, I will just continue avoiding C and enjoying my superior 
>product.

Great.  Enjoy.

	- Dan C.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-04-30 00:39 +0000
  Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 09:11 +0800
  Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-04-29 21:12 -0400
  Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 19:56 -0700
    Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 11:30 +0800
  Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-04-30 00:56 -0700
  Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-04-30 10:47 +0200
    Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 19:35 +0800
      Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-04-30 14:04 +0200
        Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 12:32 +0800
          Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-02 08:57 +0200
          Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-02 11:58 +0200
            Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 19:59 +0800
              Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-02 15:13 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 22:32 +0800
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-02 17:17 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-02 16:56 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-03 20:11 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 14:35 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-02 22:45 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 15:02 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-02 17:24 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-02 10:54 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 05:19 +0800
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-02 16:50 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 07:56 +0800
              Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-02 14:18 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-02 15:52 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-02 16:39 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-02 21:16 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 01:38 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 17:52 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 12:39 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 14:19 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-04 08:41 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-04 11:22 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 13:47 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-05 02:12 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-05 15:02 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-06 04:06 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-05 08:47 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 00:11 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 00:15 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-02 16:52 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-03 08:26 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 14:24 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-03 18:53 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 19:46 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-03 23:07 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 21:19 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 16:02 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-06 19:43 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-08 18:47 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 15:10 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-09 12:40 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 20:30 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-08 21:39 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 01:09 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-09 06:25 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 09:14 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-10 16:44 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 17:27 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 00:18 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 11:18 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 17:39 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-04 00:55 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 16:50 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-02 18:53 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-02 21:20 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 14:46 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 01:14 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 17:02 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 12:46 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-02 23:51 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 01:20 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 07:43 +0800
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 12:50 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-03 14:27 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-03 20:27 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 00:30 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 01:55 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 02:21 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-03 08:53 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 11:59 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 13:27 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 13:46 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 15:06 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 17:39 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 20:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 21:29 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-03 23:11 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 15:47 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-03 23:59 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-04 09:28 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-04 13:22 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 15:17 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 14:14 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 14:21 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 16:05 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-04 22:24 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 16:16 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-05 00:40 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 17:24 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-05 16:58 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-05 00:04 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 17:34 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 01:59 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 14:37 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-05 15:00 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 01:04 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 19:38 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-05 09:34 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 13:40 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-05 09:04 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 00:19 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-05 17:06 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 01:57 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 00:48 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-05 02:27 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 13:02 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-05 14:56 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-05 15:07 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 16:34 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-05 20:17 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 21:08 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-05 23:30 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-05 23:06 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-06 02:23 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-06 12:37 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-06 16:09 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-06 15:21 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-06 18:02 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-06 19:35 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-06 23:38 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-07 03:02 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-07 12:10 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-07 08:32 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-07 15:36 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 18:20 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-07 20:55 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 23:20 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 14:55 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 17:39 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-08 17:10 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 18:31 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 17:51 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-09 08:48 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 18:18 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-08 08:32 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-08 11:15 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 16:50 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-08 14:00 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-08 13:25 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-08 15:51 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 17:13 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 14:57 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-09 06:35 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 20:13 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-09 23:18 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 22:31 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 21:49 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-07 23:05 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-07 23:11 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 15:33 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 18:04 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-07 13:19 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 15:37 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 15:12 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 03:42 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-07 12:48 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 06:00 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-07 15:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-07 15:02 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 16:48 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-07 20:30 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 19:17 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-07 20:56 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-07 15:48 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-07 15:17 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-07 17:04 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-07 17:07 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 19:30 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-08 09:22 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 18:24 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-08 17:08 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 10:25 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-08 17:49 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 11:51 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-08 21:31 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 20:02 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-07 08:41 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-07 20:39 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-07 13:14 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 16:11 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2026-05-08 08:18 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-08 11:33 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-08 12:48 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 09:58 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-08 21:04 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 13:15 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-09 03:02 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-09 12:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 15:51 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 19:02 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-07 20:56 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-07 22:08 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-08 09:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 02:07 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-08 12:43 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-10 20:31 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-11 08:55 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 17:07 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:32 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 18:56 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-11 22:37 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 14:30 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-12 08:35 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-12 00:38 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 14:05 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-12 16:32 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 17:27 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-12 15:33 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-12 16:00 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-12 23:14 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-12 19:48 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-13 12:48 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 05:26 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 15:07 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 12:16 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-13 13:20 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 14:31 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-13 17:16 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 15:52 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 12:34 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 13:36 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 13:10 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-12 16:46 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-12 15:19 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-12 19:02 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 14:33 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 11:44 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 15:57 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-12 19:07 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 18:09 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-12 18:45 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 21:24 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 13:14 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 13:12 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 14:40 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 12:41 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-12 18:36 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 14:47 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 18:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-08 22:43 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 16:15 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-09 02:32 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 01:36 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-10 07:23 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 12:37 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-11 08:06 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 10:56 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 11:32 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 20:04 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 20:14 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-09 15:19 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 16:20 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 09:23 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-08 19:58 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 10:38 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-07 07:46 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-08 21:02 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-08 21:47 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-08 22:58 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 16:56 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-09 07:37 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-09 17:39 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-09 00:05 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-09 00:37 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 01:57 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-09 11:56 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 15:18 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-09 17:16 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-09 18:38 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-09 19:20 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 04:15 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-10 11:29 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 03:25 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 12:29 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 12:39 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 14:51 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 16:28 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 04:27 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 15:14 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 15:55 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-10 15:03 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 14:38 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 16:37 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 18:00 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-10 18:53 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 16:38 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-10 14:58 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 16:47 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-10 16:22 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 17:57 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-10 22:46 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 17:03 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 11:53 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-11 18:11 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:05 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 19:24 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 19:04 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 20:52 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 20:04 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-11 22:45 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 13:46 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-10 18:55 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 12:53 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-10 20:15 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-10 18:52 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-10 23:19 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 18:37 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-11 09:29 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-11 00:26 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-10 20:36 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 18:19 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-11 14:45 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-11 08:10 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-11 15:58 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 18:21 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:46 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 19:34 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 14:23 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-11 23:57 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-12 20:47 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 11:02 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 15:20 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:25 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 04:07 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 13:35 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-13 13:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 11:00 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 11:39 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:22 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-11 19:20 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 13:51 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 15:32 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 01:35 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-10 06:19 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 12:52 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 11:49 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 12:59 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 17:10 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 01:21 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 17:42 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 02:33 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 18:43 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-10 20:30 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-11 15:17 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-11 18:12 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-11 23:48 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-12 10:42 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-12 07:12 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-12 22:21 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-12 19:19 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-13 11:17 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-09 05:50 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-09 08:39 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-09 13:10 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-09 18:04 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-10 14:49 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-10 00:25 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 00:16 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-10 06:39 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 13:22 +0100
                Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 13:05 +0000
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-12 02:28 +0100
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 18:37 -0700
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-12 22:32 +0100
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-05-12 15:28 -0700
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 02:49 +0200
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-12 15:35 -0700
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 03:26 +0200
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-13 12:32 +0100
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 14:42 +0200
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 12:28 -0700
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-13 14:57 +0000
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-13 15:12 +0000
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-12 23:21 +0000
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-13 02:53 +0200
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-13 14:15 +0000
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 12:30 -0700
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 02:40 +0000
                Re: Alternatives to C (was Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int') Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-12 15:11 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-10 15:18 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 01:17 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 15:47 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-09 23:33 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 00:45 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 17:33 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-10 03:46 +0300
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 17:54 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-10 15:46 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 13:21 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 02:26 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 19:01 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 12:06 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 16:11 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 00:58 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 17:31 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-11 01:44 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 03:09 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 12:15 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 15:19 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-11 19:06 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 21:29 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-11 18:32 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 03:44 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-11 20:53 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-12 14:27 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-13 11:37 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 02:18 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 19:48 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 12:39 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:12 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 19:30 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:34 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 19:42 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 21:21 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-11 07:43 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 13:57 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-11 09:46 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-10 07:09 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-10 07:00 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-10 12:44 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 16:45 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-11 07:58 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 13:55 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-10 14:34 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-10 15:42 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-10 13:23 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 21:28 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 12:53 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 13:54 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 16:48 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2026-05-11 18:26 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:20 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 19:38 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 18:50 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 11:58 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 18:44 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-11 19:28 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 19:41 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 14:16 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 23:05 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 16:13 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 21:03 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-11 20:08 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-11 15:25 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-11 17:03 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-09 21:25 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-09 07:31 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-06 21:45 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 09:30 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 03:44 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-07 18:03 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-07 14:45 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2026-05-05 22:27 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 16:09 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-05 16:52 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-03 19:26 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-03 20:33 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 15:05 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-04 15:09 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 14:58 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-04 00:34 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 17:07 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-04 01:23 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-04 14:38 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-04 17:41 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-05 02:59 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 19:35 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-05 14:54 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-05 16:03 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-06 05:18 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-05 09:53 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-06 05:22 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-05-08 07:40 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-05 09:41 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-05-05 00:44 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2026-05-04 05:47 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-04 08:59 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-04 14:31 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 14:40 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 14:42 -0700
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-05 10:00 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-04 10:07 +0200
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-05-04 15:05 -0400
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-04 21:04 +0100
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-04 20:52 +0000
                Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int' Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-05-04 21:56 +0100

(Thread has 607 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)

csiph-web