Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > uk.telecom

uk.telecom

13051 articles, 772 threads (numbers 20810 – 39561) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
BT Digital Voice with no router (147 replies, showing first 100 — browse in flat view) Codger <codger524@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 10:00 +0100
   → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Codger <codger524@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 10:30 +0100
     → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Bob Pullen <me@privacy.net> 2026-04-11 11:02 +0100
       → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router angus@magsys.co.uk (Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd) 2026-04-11 14:12 +0100
   → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> 2026-04-11 11:02 +0100
     → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-11 11:13 +0100
       → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-04-11 13:54 +0100
         → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> 2026-04-11 18:24 +0100
           → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Mike Humphrey <mail@michaelhumphrey.me.uk> 2026-04-11 17:36 +0000
             → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-04-12 12:35 +0100
               → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-04-12 12:50 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-04-13 13:37 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-04-13 13:53 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-04-13 22:41 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> 2026-05-03 13:17 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-03 23:21 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-04 11:39 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-05-04 11:55 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-04 12:10 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 16:41 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> 2026-05-04 17:37 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 17:46 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-05 23:33 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> 2026-05-06 09:03 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 09:16 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Bob Eager <throwaway0008@eager.cx> 2026-05-06 08:28 +0000
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> 2026-05-06 09:31 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-06 10:34 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 14:34 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-06 16:16 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-06 17:53 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 18:17 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-06 20:23 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-06 21:41 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-07 14:14 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-06 09:40 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 14:46 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-06 16:27 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-05-06 16:38 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 18:20 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-06 19:55 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-04 19:39 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 19:07 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-04 22:30 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> 2026-05-04 22:56 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-05 09:07 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-05 23:36 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-06 10:24 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 14:49 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> 2026-05-04 19:26 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> 2026-05-04 20:06 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 20:13 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 11:09 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-04 17:46 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 17:50 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-04 17:58 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 18:19 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> 2026-05-04 19:36 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> 2026-05-04 17:59 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> 2026-05-04 19:33 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-05 13:17 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> 2026-05-05 14:11 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-05 14:28 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-05 23:40 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-06 13:50 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-06 14:53 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-06 17:53 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com> 2026-05-09 09:49 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 11:01 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-05-04 17:35 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-04 17:50 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 11:13 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-05-05 12:13 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> 2026-05-05 12:34 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-05 12:39 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 17:15 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-05-05 23:29 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-06 10:13 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-06 17:30 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-06 17:24 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-06 18:04 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Davey <davey@example.invalid> 2026-05-09 10:24 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-09 12:02 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> 2026-05-10 10:56 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-10 18:50 +0100
                 → OT: Steam (was: Re: BT Digital Voice with no router) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-10 20:16 +0100
                 → Re: OT: Steam Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-05-11 12:12 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-11 13:13 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> 2026-05-11 18:25 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> 2026-05-12 09:22 +0000
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> 2026-05-12 13:22 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> 2026-05-12 14:21 +0000
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-12 15:34 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> 2026-05-12 14:50 +0000
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> 2026-05-12 16:10 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-12 15:19 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> 2026-05-12 16:32 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-04 19:26 +0200
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 11:14 +0100
                 → Re: BT Digital Voice with no router JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> 2026-05-04 21:31 +0100
 
U&Gold (4 replies) Davey <davey@example.invalid> 2026-05-08 11:11 +0100
   → Re: U&Gold Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-08 17:48 +0100
     → Re: U&Gold Davey <davey@example.invalid> 2026-05-08 17:56 +0100
       → Re: U&Gold The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-08 20:18 +0100
         → Re: U&Gold Davey <davey@example.invalid> 2026-05-09 00:18 +0100
 
Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? (22 replies) Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-02 13:58 +0100
   → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-02 17:30 +0200
     → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-03 13:02 +0100
       → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> 2026-05-03 13:10 +0100
       → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-03 16:05 +0200
   → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-03 13:01 +0100
     → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-05-03 22:09 +0100
       → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-04 09:19 +0200
         → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 09:13 +0100
           → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-05-04 14:31 +0100
             → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-05-04 15:42 +0100
               → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 10:59 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) 2026-05-05 23:23 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> 2026-05-06 09:35 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) 2026-05-06 17:48 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-06 17:51 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> 2026-05-07 06:57 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> 2026-05-07 11:26 +0000
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) 2026-05-07 14:07 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-07 16:47 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-05-06 16:34 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) 2026-05-06 17:44 +0100
                 → Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> 2026-05-06 19:13 +0200
 
Check your March increase (ISP) (3 replies) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-04-23 12:14 +0100
   → Re: Check your March increase (ISP) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-04-23 12:20 +0100
     → Re: Check your March increase (ISP) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-04-23 13:19 +0100
       → Re: Check your March increase (ISP) Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-23 13:25 +0100
 
Engaged tone (17 replies) Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> 2026-04-14 09:57 +0100
   → Re: Engaged tone Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-04-14 12:14 +0100
     → Re: Engaged tone JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> 2026-04-14 20:07 +0100
     → Re: Engaged tone Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> 2026-04-15 11:59 +0100
   → Re: Engaged tone Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> 2026-04-14 13:00 +0100
   → Re: Engaged tone Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-14 13:22 +0100
     → Re: Engaged tone Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> 2026-04-18 22:17 +0100
       → Re: Engaged tone Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-18 22:32 +0100
         → Re: Engaged tone Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> 2026-04-19 09:54 +0100
           → Re: Engaged tone Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-19 14:11 +0100
             → Re: Engaged tone David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-04-19 17:24 +0100
               → Re: Engaged tone Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-19 21:56 +0100
                 → Re: Engaged tone David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> 2026-04-19 22:24 +0100
                 → Re: Engaged tone Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-04-19 23:29 +0100
                 → Re: Engaged tone Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> 2026-04-20 08:53 +0100
                 → Re: Engaged tone David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-04-20 09:23 +0100
                 → Re: Engaged tone David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> 2026-04-20 09:18 +0100
           → Re: Engaged tone Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-04-19 15:33 +0100

~Page 1 of ~54 (articles 39417–39561) Older →


csiph-web