Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.telecom |
| Subject | Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? |
| Date | 2026-05-05 23:23 +0100 |
| Organization | Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds |
| Message-ID | <1runsp9.1g6j2301j44fg6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <10t9h9a$3fj5o$1@dont-email.me> <82tssn3849.fsf@example.com> <n5rle5FioakU1@mid.individual.net> <82bjev9qy2.fsf@example.com> <10tcf21$akv2$1@dont-email.me> |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 04/05/2026 15:42, Richmond wrote: > > You may have noticed someone in the firefox group saying they couldn't > > reach a website. Nobody knew why. It was possible to work around it with > > VPN. That's the kind of thing which will happen with VOIP, it will stop > > working, no one will know why, no one will know who is responsible. > > So pretty much like POTS then ? > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TUVeVvnsgE> That was before Y2K, which also turned out to be a non-problem that fixed itself. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, bird-brain. My pet rock Gordon just is.
Back to uk.telecom | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-02 13:58 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> - 2026-05-02 17:30 +0200
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-03 13:02 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-05-03 13:10 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> - 2026-05-03 16:05 +0200
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-03 13:01 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-03 22:09 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> - 2026-05-04 09:19 +0200
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-04 09:13 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-04 14:31 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-04 15:42 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-05 10:59 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-05-05 23:23 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-06 09:35 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-05-06 17:48 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-06 17:51 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-07 06:57 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-07 11:26 +0000
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-05-07 14:07 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-07 16:47 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> - 2026-05-06 16:34 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-05-06 17:44 +0100
Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film? David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> - 2026-05-06 19:13 +0200
csiph-web