Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #829857 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2021-12-02 11:42 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 154 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 19:55 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 20:07 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 16:28 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 21:59 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:14 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 11:11 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-20 10:54 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 13:24 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-23 21:59 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 15:06 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-01 17:37 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:44 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 08:36 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:15 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:32 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:23 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:40 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:47 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 12:32 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 17:39 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 20:55 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 09:12 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 09:33 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:18 -0600
Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-12-03 10:24 -0800
Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:36 -0800
Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:32 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-14 23:58 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 21:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-04 12:07 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-05 12:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 15:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 16:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-09 22:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 15:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 11:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-02 21:36 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-05 10:33 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-06 17:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-13 19:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 02:04 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-19 15:53 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-10-09 15:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-05 21:51 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-22 01:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-12-07 18:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 15:50 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-10 22:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-25 22:24 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-11 19:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 11:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-15 04:39 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-16 16:44 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-17 00:15 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-17 23:39 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-21 14:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-01 11:52 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-09 22:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 10:45 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 21:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 13:42 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 15:07 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 17:53 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 02:11 +0000
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:29 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 00:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-07 11:03 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 11:26 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 11:35 -0700
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:38 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:53 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:29 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:26 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:28 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:29 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-10 03:03 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-21 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 18:28 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-29 22:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-04 16:55 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 11:13 -0700
Never heared of that He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-10-11 02:40 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 02:41 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:56 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 15:29 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-13 15:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 11:40 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 11:54 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 12:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 13:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-28 04:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-29 21:29 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 11:42 -0800
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61958328.38B3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #835769 |
and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
and this book was published March 1944..
so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
dats why Albert Einstein said:
"....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
"...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
"Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> As I mentioned before..
>
> Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> months earilier...
>
> and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
>
> one other method I didn't mentioned was
> passing information to the russians with...
> comic books...
>
> This was published before
> they dropped the bomb on Japan..
>
> "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> >
> > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> >
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >
> > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> >
> > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> >
> > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> >
> > (between the Administration and the group
> >
> > of physicists)
> >
> > "One possible way
> >
> > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> >
> > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> >
> > capacity."
> >
> > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> >
> > "His task might comprise the following:"
> >
> > (now i know it's a guy!)
> >
> > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > "providing funds"
> > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> >
> > Who is this masked man????
> >
> > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> >
> > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> >
> > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> >
> > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> >
> > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> >
> > "a person who has your confidence"
> >
> > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> >
> > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> >
> > capacity."
> >
> > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> >
> > Einstein Lied Again.
> >
> > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> >
> > oh, did you see the draft?
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > >
> > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > >
> > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > >
> > > 'which is at present'
> > >
> > > being carried on
> > >
> > > within the University laboratories.
> > >
> > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > >
> > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > the United States President????
> > >
> > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > >
> > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > >
> > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > >
> > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > >
> > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >
> > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > >
> > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > test?
> > > >
> > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > hand!
> > > >
> > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > >
> > > > Page 1
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > Page 2
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > >
> > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > >
> > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 19:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6195CE9F.6B5C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836031 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > <snip> > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity. wat about: “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story? > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 20:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6195D188.6325@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836055 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity. > > wat about: > > “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story? and of course ...astounding science fiction march 1944 based on Albert Einstein atomic bomb from Relativity 1905. > > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB! > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-18 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6196EFBD.7D8D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836058 |
On June 28, 1943, Bryon Price, director of the United States Office of Censorship (OoC) and former executive news editor of the Associated Press, sent out a
confidential note to 2,000 daily newspapers and 11,000 weeklies as well as all radio stations in the U.S. The note requested that editors prevent any articles or broadcasts from mentioning:
Production or utilization of atom smashing, atomic energy, atomic fission, atomic splitting, or any of their equivalents.
The use for military purposes of radium or radioactive materials, heavy water, high voltage discharge equipment, cyclotrons.
The following elements or any of their compounds: polonium, uranium, ytterbium, hafnium, protactinium, radium, rhenium, thorium, deuterium.
Kevrob wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:07:00 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > and of course ...astounding science fiction march 1944 based on Albert Einstein atomic bomb from Relativity 1905.
>
> Well-known to fen, of course.
>
> https://www.nyrsf.com/2017/06/steve-carper-beyond-deadline-three-additional-wwii-atomic-war-stories-and-the-office-of-censorship.html
>
> "The Battle of the Atoms" was delayed six months in SUPERMAN, and the OWI even
> looked into the Man of Tomorrow's newspaper strip.
>
> https://www.cbr.com/superman-atomic-bomb-censored-united-states-government/
>
> I read the "The Battle of the Atoms" when it was reprinted in the summer of 1971.
>
> https://www.comics.org/issue/24554/cover/4/ - SUPERMAN 243 (Vol 1)
>
> Others may have grumbled when DC-National added reprint pages and raised the price
> by 2/3rds, but I enjoyed the "golden oldies." I had never had the chance to read.
>
> --
> Kevin R
>
>
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 21:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6195EBBE.36CD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836055 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) > > > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity. > > wat about: > > > > “Time for the Starsâ€, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story? > > > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... > > > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. > > > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. > > > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? > > > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). > > > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB! > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories. > > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify. You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact... Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi. > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce, > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+.... > > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 22:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6195EF48.63B8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836073 |
The Parallel 1963 Written by: Rod Serling The Starmaker wrote: > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) > > > > > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity. > > > wat about: > > > > > > “Time for the Starsâ€, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 > > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and > > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story? > > > > > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... > > > > > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. > > > > > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. > > > > > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? > > > > > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). > > > > > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB! > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories. > > > > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify. > > You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact... > > Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi. > > > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce, > > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+.... > > > > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 22:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6195F1BA.683B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836074 |
Original title: La Planète des singes Publication date: 1963 In inglish Planet of the Apes The Starmaker wrote: > > The Parallel 1963 > Written by: Rod Serling > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) > > > > > > > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity. > > > > wat about: > > > > > > > > “Time for the Starsâ€, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 > > > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and > > > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story? > > > > > > > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... > > > > > > > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. > > > > > > > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. > > > > > > > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? > > > > > > > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). > > > > > > > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB! > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories. > > > > > > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify. > > > > You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact... > > > > Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi. > > > > > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce, > > > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+.... > > > > > > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-18 11:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6196A55B.1DD1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836077 |
I should add that when astounding science fiction published it in march 1944... the FBI told them to stop talking about atomic bombs. Albert Einstein and all his science friends were investigated, arrested, or sent to the electric chair for being...Communist, and passing atomic secrets. So, it was a time to stay away from communist scientist. What writer wants to be associated with 'these people' in those days? Hollywood writers were not allowed to use the word "Mafia". (they used outfit or organization) Even Albert Einstein friends didn't want to be near him... dis guy was a hot potato. Confess you are a communist or go to the electric chair. wats it going to be? The Starmaker wrote: > > Original title: La Planète des singes > Publication date: 1963 > > In inglish Planet of the Apes > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Parallel 1963 > > Written by: Rod Serling > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) > > > > > > > > > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity. > > > > > wat about: > > > > > > > > > > “Time for the Starsâ€, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 > > > > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and > > > > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story? > > > > > > > > > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? > > > > > > > > > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). > > > > > > > > > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB! > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories. > > > > > > > > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify. > > > > > > You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact... > > > > > > Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi. > > > > > > > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce, > > > > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+.... > > > > > > > > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-20 10:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6199445A.84B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836031 |
As I mentioned before...Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the Russians..
one of his many methods was
passing information to the Russians with...
comic books...
Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline) has Albert Einstein fingerprints all over it.
As you already know..Albert Einstein biggest lie was that the Germans were building an atomic bomb.
So, he used that narrative in Astounding Science Fiction.
The Title "Deadline"
(build the bomb before the Germans build it) dats the deadline.
Now, the very first paragraph reads:
--
Deadline
by CLEVE CARTMILL
There was a bomb that he wanted to destroy. It was
in an enemy nation’s capital, and might explode at any
moment. And that was precisely what he must prevent!
---
Is this Relativity???
"Time exists only in conscious-
ness,” he said. “There won’t be
any time, unless dust and rocks
are aware of it." --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
or science fiction?
There's more but it's only for Russians...commies.
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
>
> The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
>
> and this book was published March 1944..
>
> so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
>
> dats why Albert Einstein said:
>
> "....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
>
> "...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
>
> "Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
>
> Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > As I mentioned before..
> >
> > Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> > months earilier...
> >
> > and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> >
> > one other method I didn't mentioned was
> > passing information to the russians with...
> > comic books...
> >
> > This was published before
> > they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> >
> > "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> > Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> > eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> > “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> > “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> > energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> > compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> > of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> > “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> > atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> > That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> > “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> > “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> > “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> > two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> > >
> > > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> > >
> > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > >
> > > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> > >
> > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> > >
> > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> > >
> > > (between the Administration and the group
> > >
> > > of physicists)
> > >
> > > "One possible way
> > >
> > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> > >
> > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > >
> > > capacity."
> > >
> > > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> > >
> > > "His task might comprise the following:"
> > >
> > > (now i know it's a guy!)
> > >
> > > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > > "providing funds"
> > > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> > >
> > > Who is this masked man????
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> > >
> > > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> > >
> > > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> > >
> > > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> > >
> > > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> > >
> > > "a person who has your confidence"
> > >
> > > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> > >
> > > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > >
> > > capacity."
> > >
> > > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> > >
> > > Einstein Lied Again.
> > >
> > > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> > >
> > > oh, did you see the draft?
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> > >
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > > >
> > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > >
> > > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > > >
> > > > 'which is at present'
> > > >
> > > > being carried on
> > > >
> > > > within the University laboratories.
> > > >
> > > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > > >
> > > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > > the United States President????
> > > >
> > > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > > >
> > > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > > >
> > > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > > >
> > > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > > >
> > > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > > >
> > > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > > test?
> > > > >
> > > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > > hand!
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > > >
> > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > > >
> > > > > Page 1
> > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > Page 2
> > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > >
> > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <619A9FFB.4983@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836273 |
So, the writter of Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 (title: Deadline) story, by CLEVE CARTMILL, he
was approached by the FBI...
and they asked him..."Where did you get your ideas from?"
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> As I mentioned before...Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the Russians..
> one of his many methods was
> passing information to the Russians with...
> comic books...
>
> Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline) has Albert Einstein fingerprints all over it.
>
> As you already know..Albert Einstein biggest lie was that the Germans were building an atomic bomb.
>
> So, he used that narrative in Astounding Science Fiction.
>
> The Title "Deadline"
>
> (build the bomb before the Germans build it) dats the deadline.
>
> Now, the very first paragraph reads:
>
> --
> Deadline
>
> by CLEVE CARTMILL
>
> There was a bomb that he wanted to destroy. It was
> in an enemy nation’s capital, and might explode at any
> moment. And that was precisely what he must prevent!
>
> ---
>
> Is this Relativity???
>
> "Time exists only in conscious-
> ness,” he said. “There won’t be
> any time, unless dust and rocks
> are aware of it." --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
>
> or science fiction?
>
> There's more but it's only for Russians...commies.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> >
> > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
> >
> > and this book was published March 1944..
> >
> > so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
> >
> > dats why Albert Einstein said:
> >
> > "....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
> >
> > "...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
> >
> > "Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> >
> > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > As I mentioned before..
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> > > months earilier...
> > >
> > > and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> > >
> > > one other method I didn't mentioned was
> > > passing information to the russians with...
> > > comic books...
> > >
> > > This was published before
> > > they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> > >
> > > "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> > > Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> > > eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> > > “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> > > “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> > > energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> > > compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> > > of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> > > “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> > > atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> > > That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> > > “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> > > “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> > > “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> > > two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> > > >
> > > > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> > > >
> > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > >
> > > > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> > > >
> > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> > > >
> > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> > > >
> > > > (between the Administration and the group
> > > >
> > > > of physicists)
> > > >
> > > > "One possible way
> > > >
> > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> > > >
> > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > >
> > > > capacity."
> > > >
> > > > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> > > >
> > > > "His task might comprise the following:"
> > > >
> > > > (now i know it's a guy!)
> > > >
> > > > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > > > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > > > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > > > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > > > "providing funds"
> > > > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > > > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> > > >
> > > > Who is this masked man????
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> > > >
> > > > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> > > >
> > > > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> > > >
> > > > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> > > >
> > > > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > > > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> > > >
> > > > "a person who has your confidence"
> > > >
> > > > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> > > >
> > > > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > >
> > > > capacity."
> > > >
> > > > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > > > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> > > >
> > > > Einstein Lied Again.
> > > >
> > > > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> > > >
> > > > oh, did you see the draft?
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > >
> > > > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > >
> > > > > and
> > > > >
> > > > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > > > >
> > > > > 'which is at present'
> > > > >
> > > > > being carried on
> > > > >
> > > > > within the University laboratories.
> > > > >
> > > > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > > > >
> > > > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > > > the United States President????
> > > > >
> > > > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > > > >
> > > > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > > > >
> > > > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > > > test?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > > > hand!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Page 1
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > Page 2
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-21 13:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <619AB926.4459@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836428 |
For Master spy Albert Einstein,
Astounding Science Fiction magazine was the perfect
vehicle to pass atomic secrets to the Russians.
(passing information without making face to face contact)
So, even before Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 ...
"Someone in the United States government had realized the terrific potentialities of uranium 235 quite early and, as
far back as the summer of 1940, had rounded up every atomic research man in the country and had sworn them to silence." --Astounding Science Fiction May 1941
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v27n03_1941-05/page/n57/mode/2up
and there's more there!
When the FBI comes to you and ask you "Where do you get your ideas?"
you give them a name.
"We were searching, there in the
laboratory in Maryland, for a way
to use U235 in a controlled explo-
sion. We had a vision of a one-ton
bomb that would be a whole air raid
in itself, a single explosion that
would flatten out an entire industrial
center....
The problem was, strangely
enough, to find an explosive which
would be weak enough to blow up
only one county at a time, and stable
enough to blow up only on request.
If we could devise a really practical
rocket fuel at the same time, one
capable of driving a war rocket at a
thousand miles an hour, or more,
then we would be in a position to
make most anybody say “uncle” to
Uncle Sam. --Astounding Science Fiction May 1941
When the FBI comes to you and ask you "Where do you get your ideas?"
you give them a name. Whose name would you give?
Or whose name you think they gave????
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> So, the writter of Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 (title: Deadline) story, by CLEVE CARTMILL, he
> was approached by the FBI...
>
> and they asked him..."Where did you get your ideas from?"
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > As I mentioned before...Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the Russians..
> > one of his many methods was
> > passing information to the Russians with...
> > comic books...
> >
> > Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline) has Albert Einstein fingerprints all over it.
> >
> > As you already know..Albert Einstein biggest lie was that the Germans were building an atomic bomb.
> >
> > So, he used that narrative in Astounding Science Fiction.
> >
> > The Title "Deadline"
> >
> > (build the bomb before the Germans build it) dats the deadline.
> >
> > Now, the very first paragraph reads:
> >
> > --
> > Deadline
> >
> > by CLEVE CARTMILL
> >
> > There was a bomb that he wanted to destroy. It was
> > in an enemy nation’s capital, and might explode at any
> > moment. And that was precisely what he must prevent!
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Is this Relativity???
> >
> > "Time exists only in conscious-
> > ness,” he said. “There won’t be
> > any time, unless dust and rocks
> > are aware of it." --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
> >
> > or science fiction?
> >
> > There's more but it's only for Russians...commies.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> > >
> > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
> > >
> > > and this book was published March 1944..
> > >
> > > so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
> > >
> > > dats why Albert Einstein said:
> > >
> > > "....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > "...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > "Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> > >
> > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As I mentioned before..
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> > > > months earilier...
> > > >
> > > > and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> > > >
> > > > one other method I didn't mentioned was
> > > > passing information to the russians with...
> > > > comic books...
> > > >
> > > > This was published before
> > > > they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> > > >
> > > > "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> > > > Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> > > > eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> > > > “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> > > > “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> > > > energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> > > > compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> > > > of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> > > > “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> > > > atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> > > > That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> > > > “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> > > > “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > > explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> > > > “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> > > > two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> > > > >
> > > > > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> > > > >
> > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > >
> > > > > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> > > > >
> > > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> > > > >
> > > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> > > > >
> > > > > (between the Administration and the group
> > > > >
> > > > > of physicists)
> > > > >
> > > > > "One possible way
> > > > >
> > > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> > > > >
> > > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > > >
> > > > > capacity."
> > > > >
> > > > > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> > > > >
> > > > > "His task might comprise the following:"
> > > > >
> > > > > (now i know it's a guy!)
> > > > >
> > > > > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > > > > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > > > > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > > > > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > > > > "providing funds"
> > > > > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > > > > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> > > > >
> > > > > Who is this masked man????
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> > > > >
> > > > > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> > > > >
> > > > > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> > > > >
> > > > > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> > > > >
> > > > > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > > > > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> > > > >
> > > > > "a person who has your confidence"
> > > > >
> > > > > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> > > > >
> > > > > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > > >
> > > > > capacity."
> > > > >
> > > > > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > > > > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> > > > >
> > > > > Einstein Lied Again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> > > > >
> > > > > oh, did you see the draft?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> > > > >
> > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'which is at present'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > being carried on
> > > > > >
> > > > > > within the University laboratories.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > > > > the United States President????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > > > > >
> > > > > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > > > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > > > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > > > > test?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > > > > hand!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Page 1
> > > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > > Page 2
> > > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-23 21:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <619DD4B9.391D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #836448 |
Here are excerpts from: --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
U-235 has been separated in quantity easily sufficient for preliminary atomic-power research, and the like.
They got it out of uranium ores by new atomic isotope separation methods; they now have quantities measured in pounds.
But they have not brought the whole amount together, or any major portion of it. Because they are not at all sure that, once
started, it would stop before all of it had been consumed--in something like one micromicrosecond of time. [p. 154]
[...] Now the explosion of a pound of U-235, he said, 'Wouldn't be too unbearably violent, although it releases as
much energy as a hundred million pounds of TNT.
The surrounding matter, unable to maintain a self-supporting atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to
atomic explosion under U-235's forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, release its energy, too.
[...] What we need is a damper, something to hold the temperature of surrounding matter down. [p. 174]
[...] Two cast-iron hemispheres, clamped over the orange segments of cadmium alloy. And the fuse --- I see it is in -- a
tiny can of cadmium allow containing a speck of radium in a beryllium holder and a small explosive powerful enough to shatter
the cadmium walls... the powdered uranium oxide runs together in the central cavity.
The radium shoots neutrons into this mass--and the U-235 takes over from there.
Scientists from the other side of the world could not wait for their new issue of
Astounding Science Fiction to come out...
they were only interested in getting Updates of...The Atomic Bomb.
You can be sure Albert Einstein got his copy..
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> For Master spy Albert Einstein,
>
> Astounding Science Fiction magazine was the perfect
> vehicle to pass atomic secrets to the Russians.
> (passing information without making face to face contact)
>
> So, even before Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 ...
>
> "Someone in the United States government had realized the terrific potentialities of uranium 235 quite early and, as
> far back as the summer of 1940, had rounded up every atomic research man in the country and had sworn them to silence." --Astounding Science Fiction May 1941
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v27n03_1941-05/page/n57/mode/2up
>
> and there's more there!
>
> When the FBI comes to you and ask you "Where do you get your ideas?"
>
> you give them a name.
>
> "We were searching, there in the
> laboratory in Maryland, for a way
> to use U235 in a controlled explo-
> sion. We had a vision of a one-ton
> bomb that would be a whole air raid
> in itself, a single explosion that
> would flatten out an entire industrial
> center....
>
> The problem was, strangely
> enough, to find an explosive which
> would be weak enough to blow up
> only one county at a time, and stable
> enough to blow up only on request.
> If we could devise a really practical
> rocket fuel at the same time, one
> capable of driving a war rocket at a
> thousand miles an hour, or more,
> then we would be in a position to
> make most anybody say “uncle” to
> Uncle Sam. --Astounding Science Fiction May 1941
>
> When the FBI comes to you and ask you "Where do you get your ideas?"
>
> you give them a name. Whose name would you give?
>
> Or whose name you think they gave????
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > So, the writter of Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 (title: Deadline) story, by CLEVE CARTMILL, he
> > was approached by the FBI...
> >
> > and they asked him..."Where did you get your ideas from?"
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > As I mentioned before...Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the Russians..
> > > one of his many methods was
> > > passing information to the Russians with...
> > > comic books...
> > >
> > > Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline) has Albert Einstein fingerprints all over it.
> > >
> > > As you already know..Albert Einstein biggest lie was that the Germans were building an atomic bomb.
> > >
> > > So, he used that narrative in Astounding Science Fiction.
> > >
> > > The Title "Deadline"
> > >
> > > (build the bomb before the Germans build it) dats the deadline.
> > >
> > > Now, the very first paragraph reads:
> > >
> > > --
> > > Deadline
> > >
> > > by CLEVE CARTMILL
> > >
> > > There was a bomb that he wanted to destroy. It was
> > > in an enemy nation’s capital, and might explode at any
> > > moment. And that was precisely what he must prevent!
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Is this Relativity???
> > >
> > > "Time exists only in conscious-
> > > ness,” he said. “There won’t be
> > > any time, unless dust and rocks
> > > are aware of it." --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
> > >
> > > or science fiction?
> > >
> > > There's more but it's only for Russians...commies.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> > > >
> > > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
> > > >
> > > > and this book was published March 1944..
> > > >
> > > > so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
> > > >
> > > > dats why Albert Einstein said:
> > > >
> > > > "....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > "...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > "Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > > explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> > > >
> > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > As I mentioned before..
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> > > > > months earilier...
> > > > >
> > > > > and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> > > > >
> > > > > one other method I didn't mentioned was
> > > > > passing information to the russians with...
> > > > > comic books...
> > > > >
> > > > > This was published before
> > > > > they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> > > > >
> > > > > "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> > > > > Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> > > > > eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> > > > > “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> > > > > “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> > > > > energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> > > > > compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> > > > > of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> > > > > “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> > > > > atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> > > > > That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> > > > > “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> > > > > “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > > > explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> > > > > “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> > > > > two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> > > > >
> > > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > > > >
> > > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > > > >
> > > > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> > > > > >
> > > > > > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> > > > > >
> > > > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (between the Administration and the group
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of physicists)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "One possible way
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> > > > > >
> > > > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > > > >
> > > > > > capacity."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "His task might comprise the following:"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (now i know it's a guy!)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > > > > > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > > > > > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > > > > > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > > > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > > > > > "providing funds"
> > > > > > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > > > > > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who is this masked man????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > > > > > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "a person who has your confidence"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > > > >
> > > > > > capacity."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > > > > > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Einstein Lied Again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > oh, did you see the draft?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 'which is at present'
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > being carried on
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > within the University laboratories.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > > > > > the United States President????
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > > > > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > > > > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > > > > > test?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > > > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > > > > > hand!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > > > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > > > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > > > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > > > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Page 1
> > > > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > > > Page 2
> > > > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > > > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > > > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > > > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > > > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > > > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-01 15:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cmvfqg5n3flneup86p2c9dcn1bofe1a74t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #834997 |
In Szilard's words: "Einstein dictated a letter in German which Teller took down, and I used this German text as a guide in preparing two drafts of a letter to the President, a shorter one and a longer one, and left it up to Einstein to choose which he liked best. In other words, Albert Einstein FIRST wrote to the President a draft letter in German. On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 12:31:01 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was... > >How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a >test? > >Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb.. >short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your >hand! > > >Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation >of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein. > > > > > >Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the >suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons >for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the >Torpedo explosion... > >https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546 > >Page 1 >https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 >Page 2 >https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 > > >https://twitter.com/Starmaker111 > > > > > > > > >On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb? >> >>I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender. >> >>The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right???? >> >> >> >> >>The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>, >>> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat >>> >> they did in those >>> > >>> >Still wrong. >>> >>> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary.. >>> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse.. >>> and he tells her.. >>> >>> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?" >>> >>> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!" >>> >>> He looks at it...(then does a spell check) >>> >>> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times. >>> >>> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it >>> begins with a S and small z, ..." >>> >>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1 >>> >>> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter... >>> >>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2 >>> >>> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!" >>> >>> She tells him..."You're the bomb!" >>> -- >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >>> the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-01 17:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <so910c$fun$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #837273 |
On 12/1/2021 5:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > In Szilard's words: "Einstein dictated a letter in German which Teller > took down, and I used this German text as a guide in preparing two > drafts of a letter to the President, a shorter one and a longer one, > and left it up to Einstein to choose which he liked best. Have you read Szilard's book that begins with a "10 commandments" page of his own? :-) I've forgotten the title. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-01 21:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61A85D46.563B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #837274 |
Clutterfreak wrote: > > On 12/1/2021 5:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > In Szilard's words: "Einstein dictated a letter in German which Teller > > took down, and I used this German text as a guide in preparing two > > drafts of a letter to the President, a shorter one and a longer one, > > and left it up to Einstein to choose which he liked best. > > Have you read Szilard's book that begins with a "10 commandments" page > of his own? :-) I've forgotten the title. No, i didn't read it...but there are two books of that title.. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Ten_Commandments_of_Leo_Szilard/8q-EQwAACAAJ?hl=en https://www.amazon.com/Zehn-Gebote-commandments-Leo-Szilard/dp/B0007HT5KW/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=The+Ten+Commandments+of+Leo+Szilard&qid=1638423594&s=books&sr=1-1 -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 08:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <soallh$7mi$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #837290 |
On 12/1/2021 11:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Clutterfreak wrote: >> >> On 12/1/2021 5:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> In Szilard's words: "Einstein dictated a letter in German which Teller >>> took down, and I used this German text as a guide in preparing two >>> drafts of a letter to the President, a shorter one and a longer one, >>> and left it up to Einstein to choose which he liked best. >> >> Have you read Szilard's book that begins with a "10 commandments" page >> of his own? :-) I've forgotten the title. > > No, i didn't read it...but there are two books of that title.. > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Ten_Commandments_of_Leo_Szilard/8q-EQwAACAAJ?hl=en > > > https://www.amazon.com/Zehn-Gebote-commandments-Leo-Szilard/dp/B0007HT5KW/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=The+Ten+Commandments+of+Leo+Szilard&qid=1638423594&s=books&sr=1-1 > > > > > > It was a book he wrote himself as far as I remember. Not the one that was about how to coexist with other nuclear powered countries. Very rare. Only one library had one copy of it in Dallas area in early 1980s. Find it and read it. I bet you'll enjoy that. Some works of value perish as time passes, especially after the advent of internet, by mere size they have among the ocean of garbage that surrounds them. If you ask me, using internet to find it will lead you nowhere. Start with libraries around you just in case by now they have not gotten rid of that obscure work years ago already. Just in case they had a copy of it to begin with. Libraries do regularly get rid of their older books. Another example of it is the German exercise book I was looking for. I spent 30 years off and on looking for it and could not find it. I have a Persian translation of it and wanted the original German. I even asked that nutcase "Hanson" in this forum if he could find resources to use to find it. Of course he couldn't or wouldn't (which is the same thing if he is a CH). Some library, somewhere, probably got rid of the last copy of it that was in existence when the clueless clerk opened it and did not understand the significance of it. I think the same thing may have happened to Szilard's book. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 10:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61A90D40.643A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #837299 |
Clutterfreak wrote:
>
> On 12/1/2021 11:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Clutterfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/1/2021 5:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> In Szilard's words: "Einstein dictated a letter in German which Teller
> >>> took down, and I used this German text as a guide in preparing two
> >>> drafts of a letter to the President, a shorter one and a longer one,
> >>> and left it up to Einstein to choose which he liked best.
> >>
> >> Have you read Szilard's book that begins with a "10 commandments" page
> >> of his own? :-) I've forgotten the title.
> >
> > No, i didn't read it...but there are two books of that title..
> >
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Ten_Commandments_of_Leo_Szilard/8q-EQwAACAAJ?hl=en
> >
> >
> > https://www.amazon.com/Zehn-Gebote-commandments-Leo-Szilard/dp/B0007HT5KW/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=The+Ten+Commandments+of+Leo+Szilard&qid=1638423594&s=books&sr=1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> It was a book he wrote himself as far as I remember. Not the one that
> was about how to coexist with other nuclear powered countries. Very
> rare. Only one library had one copy of it in Dallas area in early 1980s.
> Find it and read it. I bet you'll enjoy that.
>
> Some works of value perish as time passes, especially after the advent
> of internet, by mere size they have among the ocean of garbage that
> surrounds them. If you ask me, using internet to find it will lead you
> nowhere. Start with libraries around you just in case by now they have
> not gotten rid of that obscure work years ago already. Just in case they
> had a copy of it to begin with. Libraries do regularly get rid of their
> older books.
>
> Another example of it is the German exercise book I was looking for. I
> spent 30 years off and on looking for it and could not find it. I have a
> Persian translation of it and wanted the original German. I even asked
> that nutcase "Hanson" in this forum if he could find resources to use to
> find it. Of course he couldn't or wouldn't (which is the same thing if
> he is a CH). Some library, somewhere, probably got rid of the last copy
> of it that was in existence when the clueless clerk opened it and did
> not understand the significance of it. I think the same thing may have
> happened to Szilard's book.
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
TEN
COMMANDMENTS
by
Leo Szilard
1. Recognize the relationships between things and the laws
which govern men's actions, so that you
know what you are doing.
2.
Direct
your
deeds
to
a
worthy
goal,
but
do
not
ask
if
they
will
achieve
the
goal;
let
them
be
models and examples rather than means to an end.
3.
Speak to
all
others
as you
do
to
yourself, without
regard
to
the effect
you
make,
so that
you
do
not
expel
them
from
your
world
and
in
your
isolation
lose
sight
of
the
meaning
of
life
and
the
perfection of the creation.
4. Do not destroy what you cannot create.
5. Touch no dish unless you are hungry. (A pun that could read -
Do not turn to the court of law unless you are hungry).
6. Do not desire what you cannot have.
7. Do not lie without need.
8. Honor children. Listen to their words with reverence and speak to
them with endless love.
9.
Do
your
work for
six years;
but in
the seventh, go
into solitude
or
among
strangers,
so
that the
memory of your friends does not prevent you from being what you have
become.
10. Lead your life with a gentle hand and be ready to depart whenever
you are called.
https://www.abebooks.com/9780262191685/Leo-Szilard-Version-Facts-Selected-0262191687/plp
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 13:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sob704$nkm$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #837308 |
On 12/2/2021 12:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > https://www.abebooks.com/9780262191685/Leo-Szilard-Version-Facts-Selected-0262191687/plp Yes, this is the one! In its first page it listed his 10 commandments :) It's a thin common looking book that escapes attention cause it looks like millions of those other thin hard cover crap that fills the bookstores and libraries. But it is a jewel indeed. As soon as I saw the picture I remembered it :) This is the back of the book of course. I don't know why there's no front picture there. Look at the price! Somebody must've had a similar attitude towards it to mine. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 10:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61A90F25.2651@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #837299 |
Clutterfreak wrote: > > On 12/1/2021 11:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Clutterfreak wrote: > >> > >> On 12/1/2021 5:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> In Szilard's words: "Einstein dictated a letter in German which Teller > >>> took down, and I used this German text as a guide in preparing two > >>> drafts of a letter to the President, a shorter one and a longer one, > >>> and left it up to Einstein to choose which he liked best. > >> > >> Have you read Szilard's book that begins with a "10 commandments" page > >> of his own? :-) I've forgotten the title. > > > > No, i didn't read it...but there are two books of that title.. > > > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Ten_Commandments_of_Leo_Szilard/8q-EQwAACAAJ?hl=en > > > > > > https://www.amazon.com/Zehn-Gebote-commandments-Leo-Szilard/dp/B0007HT5KW/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=The+Ten+Commandments+of+Leo+Szilard&qid=1638423594&s=books&sr=1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was a book he wrote himself as far as I remember. Not the one that > was about how to coexist with other nuclear powered countries. Very > rare. Only one library had one copy of it in Dallas area in early 1980s. > Find it and read it. I bet you'll enjoy that. > > Some works of value perish as time passes, especially after the advent > of internet, by mere size they have among the ocean of garbage that > surrounds them. If you ask me, using internet to find it will lead you > nowhere. Start with libraries around you just in case by now they have > not gotten rid of that obscure work years ago already. Just in case they > had a copy of it to begin with. Libraries do regularly get rid of their > older books. > > Another example of it is the German exercise book I was looking for. I > spent 30 years off and on looking for it and could not find it. I have a > Persian translation of it and wanted the original German. I even asked > that nutcase "Hanson" in this forum if he could find resources to use to > find it. Of course he couldn't or wouldn't (which is the same thing if > he is a CH). Some library, somewhere, probably got rid of the last copy > of it that was in existence when the clueless clerk opened it and did > not understand the significance of it. I think the same thing may have > happened to Szilard's book. if you're looking for 'hard to find' books try: https://www.abebooks.com/ used bookstores from all over the world sell their used and rare books there. Your first step is to know the title of the book... advance search you can use keywords instead. people sell books for $500.00, but you can find the same book for $2.50. > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 13:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sob7eg$ntu$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #837309 |
On 12/2/2021 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > if you're looking for 'hard to find' books try: > > https://www.abebooks.com/ > > used bookstores from all over the world sell their used and rare books > there. > > > Your first step is to know the title of the book... > advance search you can use keywords instead. > > people sell books for $500.00, but you can find the same book for $2.50. > This works for relatively newer books. The exercise book I was after came out in 1930s. These copies got lost long before newer internet related facilities became available. Germany was bombed extensively in WWII. I suspect last copy was destroyed that way. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web