Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #836428
| Message-ID | <619A9FFB.4983@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: Einstein Lied Again |
| References | (7 earlier) <61882FC7.14AD@ix.netcom.com> <61901D54.8B7@ix.netcom.com> <619228C9.1B17@ix.netcom.com> <61958328.38B3@ix.netcom.com> <6199445A.84B@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
So, the writter of Astounding Science Fiction March 1944 (title: Deadline) story, by CLEVE CARTMILL, he
was approached by the FBI...
and they asked him..."Where did you get your ideas from?"
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> As I mentioned before...Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the Russians..
> one of his many methods was
> passing information to the Russians with...
> comic books...
>
> Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline) has Albert Einstein fingerprints all over it.
>
> As you already know..Albert Einstein biggest lie was that the Germans were building an atomic bomb.
>
> So, he used that narrative in Astounding Science Fiction.
>
> The Title "Deadline"
>
> (build the bomb before the Germans build it) dats the deadline.
>
> Now, the very first paragraph reads:
>
> --
> Deadline
>
> by CLEVE CARTMILL
>
> There was a bomb that he wanted to destroy. It was
> in an enemy nation’s capital, and might explode at any
> moment. And that was precisely what he must prevent!
>
> ---
>
> Is this Relativity???
>
> "Time exists only in conscious-
> ness,” he said. “There won’t be
> any time, unless dust and rocks
> are aware of it." --Astounding Science Fiction march 1944 (title: Deadline)
>
> or science fiction?
>
> There's more but it's only for Russians...commies.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> >
> > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
> >
> > and this book was published March 1944..
> >
> > so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
> >
> > dats why Albert Einstein said:
> >
> > "....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
> >
> > "...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
> >
> > "Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
> >
> > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > As I mentioned before..
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> > > months earilier...
> > >
> > > and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> > >
> > > one other method I didn't mentioned was
> > > passing information to the russians with...
> > > comic books...
> > >
> > > This was published before
> > > they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> > >
> > > "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> > > Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> > > eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> > > “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> > > “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> > > energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> > > compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> > > of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> > > “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> > > atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> > > That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> > > “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> > > “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> > > It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> > > utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> > > explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> > > “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> > > two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> > > >
> > > > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> > > >
> > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > >
> > > > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> > > >
> > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> > > >
> > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> > > >
> > > > (between the Administration and the group
> > > >
> > > > of physicists)
> > > >
> > > > "One possible way
> > > >
> > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> > > >
> > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > >
> > > > capacity."
> > > >
> > > > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> > > >
> > > > "His task might comprise the following:"
> > > >
> > > > (now i know it's a guy!)
> > > >
> > > > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > > > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > > > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > > > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > > > "providing funds"
> > > > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > > > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> > > >
> > > > Who is this masked man????
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> > > >
> > > > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> > > >
> > > > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> > > >
> > > > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> > > >
> > > > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > > > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> > > >
> > > > "a person who has your confidence"
> > > >
> > > > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> > > >
> > > > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> > > >
> > > > capacity."
> > > >
> > > > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > > > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> > > >
> > > > Einstein Lied Again.
> > > >
> > > > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> > > >
> > > > oh, did you see the draft?
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > > >
> > > > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > > > >
> > > > > and
> > > > >
> > > > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > > > >
> > > > > 'which is at present'
> > > > >
> > > > > being carried on
> > > > >
> > > > > within the University laboratories.
> > > > >
> > > > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > > > >
> > > > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > > > the United States President????
> > > > >
> > > > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > > > >
> > > > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > > > >
> > > > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > > > test?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > > > hand!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Page 1
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > > Page 2
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 19:55 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 20:07 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 16:28 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 21:59 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:14 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 11:11 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-20 10:54 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 13:24 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-23 21:59 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 15:06 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-01 17:37 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:44 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 08:36 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:15 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:32 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:23 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:40 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:47 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 12:32 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 17:39 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 20:55 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 09:12 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 09:33 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:18 -0600
Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-12-03 10:24 -0800
Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:36 -0800
Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:32 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-14 23:58 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 21:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-04 12:07 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-05 12:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 15:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 16:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-09 22:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 15:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 11:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-02 21:36 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-05 10:33 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-06 17:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-13 19:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 02:04 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-19 15:53 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-10-09 15:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-05 21:51 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-22 01:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-12-07 18:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 15:50 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-10 22:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-25 22:24 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-11 19:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 11:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-15 04:39 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-16 16:44 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-17 00:15 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-17 23:39 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-21 14:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-01 11:52 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-09 22:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 10:45 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 21:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 13:42 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 15:07 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 17:53 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 02:11 +0000
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:29 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 00:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-07 11:03 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 11:26 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 11:35 -0700
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:38 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:53 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:29 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:26 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:28 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:29 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-10 03:03 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-21 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 18:28 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-29 22:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-04 16:55 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 11:13 -0700
Never heared of that He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-10-11 02:40 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 02:41 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:56 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 15:29 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-13 15:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 11:40 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 11:54 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 12:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 13:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-28 04:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-29 21:29 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 11:42 -0800
csiph-web