Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #836031
| Message-ID | <61958328.38B3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: Einstein Lied Again |
| References | (5 earlier) <61180C25.631@ix.netcom.com> <p7o5og9ij1fjikjefplvmaul2m050je9b0@4ax.com> <61882FC7.14AD@ix.netcom.com> <61901D54.8B7@ix.netcom.com> <619228C9.1B17@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944
The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...
and this book was published March 1944..
so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.
dats why Albert Einstein said:
"....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein
"...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein
"Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
explosion. And I mean every- thing." - astounding science fiction march 1944
Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> As I mentioned before..
>
> Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> months earilier...
>
> and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
>
> one other method I didn't mentioned was
> passing information to the russians with...
> comic books...
>
> This was published before
> they dropped the bomb on Japan..
>
> "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
> two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
>
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> >
> > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> >
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >
> > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> >
> > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> >
> > of physicists working on chain reactions in America."
> >
> > (between the Administration and the group
> >
> > of physicists)
> >
> > "One possible way
> >
> > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> >
> > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> >
> > capacity."
> >
> > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> >
> > "His task might comprise the following:"
> >
> > (now i know it's a guy!)
> >
> > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > "providing funds"
> > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> >
> > Who is this masked man????
> >
> > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> >
> > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> >
> > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> >
> > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> >
> > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> >
> > "a person who has your confidence"
> >
> > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> >
> > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> >
> > capacity."
> >
> > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> >
> > Einstein Lied Again.
> >
> > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> >
> > oh, did you see the draft?
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > >
> > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > >
> > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > >
> > > 'which is at present'
> > >
> > > being carried on
> > >
> > > within the University laboratories.
> > >
> > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > >
> > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > the United States President????
> > >
> > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > >
> > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > >
> > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > >
> > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > >
> > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >
> > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > >
> > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > test?
> > > >
> > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > hand!
> > > >
> > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > >
> > > > Page 1
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > Page 2
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > >
> > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > >
> > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > >> the unchallengeable.
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 19:55 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 20:07 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 16:28 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 21:59 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:14 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 11:11 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-20 10:54 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 13:24 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-23 21:59 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 15:06 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-01 17:37 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:44 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 08:36 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:15 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:32 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:23 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:40 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:47 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 12:32 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 17:39 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 20:55 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 09:12 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 09:33 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:18 -0600
Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-12-03 10:24 -0800
Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:36 -0800
Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:32 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-14 23:58 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 21:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-04 12:07 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-05 12:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 15:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 16:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-09 22:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 15:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 11:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-02 21:36 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-05 10:33 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-06 17:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-13 19:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 02:04 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-19 15:53 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-10-09 15:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-05 21:51 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-22 01:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-12-07 18:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 15:50 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-10 22:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-25 22:24 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-11 19:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 11:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-15 04:39 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-16 16:44 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-17 00:15 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-17 23:39 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-21 14:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-01 11:52 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-09 22:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 10:45 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 21:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 13:42 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 15:07 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 17:53 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 02:11 +0000
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:29 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 00:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-07 11:03 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 11:26 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 11:35 -0700
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:38 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:53 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:29 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:26 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:28 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:29 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-10 03:03 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-21 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 18:28 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-29 22:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-04 16:55 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 11:13 -0700
Never heared of that He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-10-11 02:40 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 02:41 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:56 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 15:29 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-13 15:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 11:40 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 11:54 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 12:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 13:22 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-28 04:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-29 21:29 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 11:42 -0800
csiph-web