Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #866225
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained |
| Date | 2022-12-15 05:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k00gcvF9drpU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <jvlcovFi9bhU1@mid.individual.net> <jvtc9uFp8ooU1@mid.individual.net> <jvtshrFrim3U1@mid.individual.net> <k006siF82f3U1@mid.individual.net> <tneomr$328vq$5@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 12/15/2022 3:17 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 12/15/2022 1:15 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 14.12.2022 um 13:06 schrieb whodat: >>> On 12/14/2022 1:29 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> Am 11.12.2022 um 07:48 schrieb Thomas Heger: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Germany has no real demand for a stealth bomber, anyhow, because >>>>>>> Germany does not plan to bomb anything in the near future. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Now you're doing strategic planning for the German government? >>>>>> >>>>> No, unfortunately not. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> If I personally had to buy fighter planes for Germany, I would >>>>>>> not buy >>>>>>> a stealth bomber at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Finally one glimmer of truth, you don't have responsibility. You >>>>>> have a >>>>>> right to question those who are responsible but no "right" to >>>>>> complain >>>>>> to or about the USA's provision of equipment. You probably don't >>>>>> think >>>>>> of it this way but what you are doing here in sci newsgroups is >>>>>> trolling. You're angry and you're trying to incite anger in others >>>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>> I think usually in terms of price-worthyness of baught items and >>>>> think, >>>>> the F35 is way too expenesive, not very reliable and not what Germany >>>>> needs. >>>>> >>>>> If I could spent the same money on US war planes, I would buy >>>>> different >>>>> ones like these huge cargo planes and the 'Warthog'. >>>>> >>>> Now I see these crappy planes on German tv in the news and that the >>>> current defense minister wants to spent most of the budget for them. >>>> >>>> That makes me sick and I really dislike the idea to buy these planes. >>>> >>>> I also dislike the idea of deficit spendings for questionabe arms >>>> deals, because that would multiply the dangers of the already >>>> questionable purchase. >>>> >>>> Especially in times of 'inflation' the government should try to cut >>>> unnecessary spendings and useless arms are a good means to start with >>>> that. >>> >>> No purchases, no kickbacks. Get a clue already. >>> >> >> Well, we had Franz Joseph Strauss already as defense minister. He was >> the guy from Bavaria, who puchased the starfighter F 104 from Lockeed >> and got some 'kick-backs' (as far as that is known). > > EuroFighter 2000 will down that sucker! ;^) f-104, 1958. Eurofighter, 2003. A never ending sequence of greater advantage. Nothing to get excited about. >> I'm not involved in military purchases at all, hence cannot tell too >> much about the details. >> >> But it was a HUGE !!! scandal and absolutely nobody wants anything >> similar anytime soon. >> >> >> TH >> >> >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Dallas Basurto <aarr@maramr.sa> - 2022-12-05 18:34 +0000
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-06 09:08 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-06 13:01 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-07 09:12 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-07 12:31 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-08 08:06 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-08 10:17 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-09 07:54 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 10:56 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-10 07:53 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-10 06:53 -0800
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 10:06 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-11 07:48 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-14 08:29 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 06:06 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 17:36 +0000
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:48 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-15 10:15 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-15 01:17 -0800
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-15 05:57 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-16 12:45 -0800
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-15 05:52 -0600
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-16 08:43 +0100
Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-07 11:23 -0800
csiph-web