Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #865622

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained
Date 2022-12-06 09:08 +0100
Message-ID <jv8bklFidloU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (18 earlier) <afe33d90-aab4-4dfe-a62c-9e69f7818b04n@googlegroups.com> <jutncvFtkd8U1@mid.individual.net> <b1c8b485-d958-4d1d-bd02-d5248c6ecd4an@googlegroups.com> <jv5m7hF5u8eU1@mid.individual.net> <tmldjs$k4h$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 05.12.2022 um 19:34 schrieb Dallas Basurto:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 02.12.2022 um 12:17 schrieb JanPB:
>>>>>> Infinity is not a location, hence nothing can be placed there.
>>
>> A place far away is not infinitity!
>> A place far away is a real place, but in some distance.
>> We only know from the context, that Einstein wanted the source so far
>> away, that plane wave approximations are possible in vicinitity of the
>> center of the coordinate system.
>
> let him pack his shit and move to america. These uneducated, unskilled
> dicks, wants make us believe they landed man on moon 1969.
>
> Endless Fail: World's Biggest Joke F-35 Has Another Disaster
> https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/bNJIRyMgKtpp
>

German military is apparently forced to buy these planes to replace 
'Tornados'.

I woukd say, that

https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/what-went-wrong-with-the-f-35-fighter-jet/

"The most expensive fighter jet in history is also one of the least 
reliable.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Air Force tacitly admitted that the F-35 
fighter jet was a failure. A very expensive, time-consuming failure.

The F-35 was supposed to be a low-cost, lightweight fighter jet. But 
with a cost of around $100 million per jet and project delays now 
stretching into double digits, the F-35 is one of the most high-profile 
failures in the history of military procurement. What happened, and what 
does the future hold for the F-35 fighter jet?"

isn't really a recommendendation.



TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Dallas Basurto <aarr@maramr.sa> - 2022-12-05 18:34 +0000
  Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-06 09:08 +0100
    Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-06 13:01 -0600
      Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-07 09:12 +0100
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-07 12:31 -0600
          Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-08 08:06 +0100
            Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-08 10:17 -0600
              Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-09 07:54 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 10:56 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-10 07:53 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-10 06:53 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 10:06 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-11 07:48 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-14 08:29 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 06:06 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 17:36 +0000
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:48 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-15 10:15 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-15 01:17 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-15 05:57 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-16 12:45 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-15 05:52 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-16 08:43 +0100
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-07 11:23 -0800

csiph-web