Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #865889

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/10/2022 12:53 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 09.12.2022 um 17:56 schrieb whodat:
>> On 12/9/2022 12:54 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> Am 08.12.2022 um 17:17 schrieb whodat:
>>>> On 12/8/2022 1:06 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>> Am 07.12.2022 um 19:31 schrieb whodat:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> I make no apologies for Germany's political blunders, they've been 
>>>> doing
>>>> that since before I was born. Only the names have been changed.
>>>
>>> Sure. But you should distinguish between politicians and the people.
>>
>> I've written it here before, the people get the government they deserve
>> no matter how or what you argue. You're full of excuses and in your
>> argumentation accept no responsibility. As has been pointed out to you,
>> another European nation bought the same planes from the USA and had
>> a very good safety record with them. It has become clear to me that you
>> argue for its own sake without achieving anything. Too bad.
>>
>>> A nation is not the talking head at the most prominent political
>>> position.
>>
>> Then what the hell are you doing here?
> 
> sorry, but I was born here.
> 
> Usually you do not decide where you like to live.


Born on Usenet, now there's a trick.


>>> Politicians come and go and sooner or later better politicians will 
>>> come.
>>
>> In the end, whether or not you realize it, you have just accepted
>> Germany's responsibility for the failing aircraft.
>>
> You are usually not responsible for what you have not done.


Nonsense.


> F35 stealth bombers are not a German development, but stem from the USA.


Did someone twist Germany's arm behind it's back and force Germany to
purchase defective airplanes? And who/what the hell are you anyway, you 
don't have authority to speak on behalf of the government or the German 
people.



> Germany has no real demand for a stealth bomber, anyhow, because Germany 
> does not plan to bomb anything in the near future.


Now you're doing strategic planning for the German government?



> If I personally had to buy fighter planes for Germany, I would not buy a 
> stealth bomber at all.


Finally one glimmer of truth, you don't have responsibility. You have a
right to question those who are responsible but no "right" to complain
to or about the USA's provision of equipment. You probably don't think
of it this way but what you are doing here in sci newsgroups is
trolling. You're angry and you're trying to incite anger in others here.



> We have a demand for state-of-the-art interceptors, air-to-ground 
> fighters like the 'Warthog' and for large cargo planes.


Who is the "we" to whom you refer here?



> The F35 is way too expensive and of no obvious use. But large cargo 
> planes and fighter jets against tanks on the ground are certainly welcome.


Nobody here, in a Usenet sci newsgroup, can do anything about your
gripes that don't belong here.


> 
> Another class of jets is called 'air-superiority-fighters', to which the 
> F35 also does not belong.


How very nice, while OT.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Dallas Basurto <aarr@maramr.sa> - 2022-12-05 18:34 +0000
  Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-06 09:08 +0100
    Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-06 13:01 -0600
      Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-07 09:12 +0100
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-07 12:31 -0600
          Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-08 08:06 +0100
            Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-08 10:17 -0600
              Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-09 07:54 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 10:56 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-10 07:53 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-10 06:53 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 10:06 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-11 07:48 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-14 08:29 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 06:06 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 17:36 +0000
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:48 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-15 10:15 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-15 01:17 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-15 05:57 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-16 12:45 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-15 05:52 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-16 08:43 +0100
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-07 11:23 -0800

csiph-web