Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #892476

Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 12:17:22 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Stephen Hawking once asked:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
> >> > > > > to that question, has he ever consider
> >> > > > > asking a woman that question?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I don't mean a woman scientist..
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > i mean, just any woman.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
> >> > > > > entitled to know the answer?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Is he Moses?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking  was an atheist.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels
> >> > > > "bother"..
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Mother Nature?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is something bothering her?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yous science guys make no sense...
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother)
> >> > > to try
> >> > > to understand the universe...
> >> > >
> >> > > and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
> >> > >
> >> > > Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being
> >> > > ...rational.
> >> > >
> >> > > put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.
> >>
> >> Okay, I see yous people have not clue (including Stephen Hawking)...
> >>
> >> Stephen Hawking is searching for a 'rational' answer...
> >>
> >> Clue number one: The universe isn't 'bothered'..
> >>
> >> the reason Why numbers don't exist is because the universe is neither ratioanl or irrational.
> >>
> >> Imaginay numbers.
> >>
> >> Logic gots nothing to do with it.
> >>
> >> The Universe 'simply' is ...unaware.
> >>
> >> So, the universe is not 'bothered'.
> >>
> >> It has absolutely has no awareness you are here.
> >>
> >> And, (ask the math girls) there are no real numbers in a universe that is neither rational nor irrational.
> >>
> >> Look up there in the universe, (my gawd it's filled with rocks!) you see a lot of 'rocks'..
> >>
> >> rocks are neither rational nor irrational...
> >>
> >> they are not even ...bothered at all.
> >>
> >> Why does the rock go to all the bother of existing? Answer: No bother at all. It's just...there.
> >
> >In a nutshell
> >
> >there are no real numbers
> >there are no laws of physics
> >there are no flying saucers
> >from other space
> >there is no life on other
> >planets in the universe..
> >there is no God
> >or anything with
> >any awareness at all.
> >
> >It's just...You here.
> 
> Nobody knows you're here.
> 
> You don't know what are you doing here?
> 
> You don't know what's going on here?
> 
> You don't even know who you are anyway?
> 
> You don't know Where you are?
> 
> You don't know What you are?
> 
> You don't know Who you are?
> 
> None of yous knows who you are.
> 
> Yous have  no memory.
> 
> No knowledge of what went before.
> 
> No understanding of what is now.
> 
> No knowledge of what will be.
> 
> How long you we be here?
> 
> You are  all insane.
> 
> I want everybody out...Now!
> 
> Now, get off my fucking planet!
> 
> That's right!
> 
> MY  Fucking   Planet!

I heard that scientists want to kill everyone on earth and
start all over again...but they don't know what to do with all the dead
bodies.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-03 22:03 -0700
  Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-04 05:24 +0000
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-04 07:55 +0200
      Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-04 22:38 +0000
  Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-04 10:46 -0700
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:29 -0700
      Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:37 -0700
        Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 19:02 -0500
          Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:12 -0700
            Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:39 -0700
              Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:50 -0700
            Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:39 -0500
              Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:57 -0500
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-04 14:15 -0700
      Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-04 15:19 -0700
        Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-10 22:58 -0700
          Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-13 12:17 -0700
            Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-14 01:13 -0700
              Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-19 23:50 -0700
      Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-05 11:17 -0700
        Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2025-04-09 13:00 +0000
          Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-09 13:10 +0000
          Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 15:15 -0500
            Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-10 22:32 +0200
              Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 14:06 -0700
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? x <x@x.org> - 2025-04-10 15:14 -0700
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-11 07:30 +0200
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 01:12 +0000
              Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 19:32 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-11 15:44 +0200
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 08:17 -0700
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 08:53 -0700
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 11:56 -0500
          Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 11:03 -0500
  Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 14:34 -0500
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:39 -0700
      Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 14:45 -0500
        Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 13:02 -0700
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:57 -0700
  Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-04-09 15:21 +0100
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 09:44 -0700
      Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? "shades@cov.net.inv" <seeu@nt.net> - 2025-04-11 20:16 +0100
        Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 07:35 -0700
          Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 11:59 -0700
            Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 01:08 +0000
              Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 20:39 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 21:40 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 03:04 +0000
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 22:49 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:08 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:27 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 04:53 +0000
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 00:48 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 06:29 +0000
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 04:24 +0000
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 02:52 +0000
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:45 -0500
                Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-20 12:05 +0000
    Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-11 06:27 +0200
  Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 09:58 +0000

csiph-web