Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #892476
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? |
| Date | 2025-04-19 23:50 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <68049934.1C1D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <67F04BF8.F9C@ix.netcom.com> <67F05AD7.62C1@ix.netcom.com> <67F8AF6E.5C2A@ix.netcom.com> <67FC0DC2.74C3@ix.netcom.com> <cofpvj1jnjrdp08skggckd07i0hh04pitp@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 12:17:22 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >> > > >> > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > > > >> > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Stephen Hawking once asked: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > If Stephen Hawking would like an answer > >> > > > > to that question, has he ever consider > >> > > > > asking a woman that question? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I don't mean a woman scientist.. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > i mean, just any woman. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is > >> > > > > entitled to know the answer? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Is he Moses? > >> > > > > >> > > > I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist. > >> > > > > >> > > > But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels > >> > > > "bother".. > >> > > > > >> > > > Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe? > >> > > > > >> > > > Mother Nature? > >> > > > > >> > > > Is something bothering her? > >> > > > > >> > > > Yous science guys make no sense... > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother) > >> > > to try > >> > > to understand the universe... > >> > > > >> > > and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman. > >> > > > >> > > Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being > >> > > ...rational. > >> > > > >> > > put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night. > >> > >> Okay, I see yous people have not clue (including Stephen Hawking)... > >> > >> Stephen Hawking is searching for a 'rational' answer... > >> > >> Clue number one: The universe isn't 'bothered'.. > >> > >> the reason Why numbers don't exist is because the universe is neither ratioanl or irrational. > >> > >> Imaginay numbers. > >> > >> Logic gots nothing to do with it. > >> > >> The Universe 'simply' is ...unaware. > >> > >> So, the universe is not 'bothered'. > >> > >> It has absolutely has no awareness you are here. > >> > >> And, (ask the math girls) there are no real numbers in a universe that is neither rational nor irrational. > >> > >> Look up there in the universe, (my gawd it's filled with rocks!) you see a lot of 'rocks'.. > >> > >> rocks are neither rational nor irrational... > >> > >> they are not even ...bothered at all. > >> > >> Why does the rock go to all the bother of existing? Answer: No bother at all. It's just...there. > > > >In a nutshell > > > >there are no real numbers > >there are no laws of physics > >there are no flying saucers > >from other space > >there is no life on other > >planets in the universe.. > >there is no God > >or anything with > >any awareness at all. > > > >It's just...You here. > > Nobody knows you're here. > > You don't know what are you doing here? > > You don't know what's going on here? > > You don't even know who you are anyway? > > You don't know Where you are? > > You don't know What you are? > > You don't know Who you are? > > None of yous knows who you are. > > Yous have no memory. > > No knowledge of what went before. > > No understanding of what is now. > > No knowledge of what will be. > > How long you we be here? > > You are all insane. > > I want everybody out...Now! > > Now, get off my fucking planet! > > That's right! > > MY Fucking Planet! I heard that scientists want to kill everyone on earth and start all over again...but they don't know what to do with all the dead bodies. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-03 22:03 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-04 05:24 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-04 07:55 +0200
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-04 22:38 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-04 10:46 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:29 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:37 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 19:02 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:12 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:39 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:50 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:39 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:57 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-04 15:19 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-10 22:58 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-13 12:17 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-14 01:13 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-19 23:50 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-05 11:17 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2025-04-09 13:00 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-09 13:10 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 15:15 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-10 22:32 +0200
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 14:06 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? x <x@x.org> - 2025-04-10 15:14 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-11 07:30 +0200
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 01:12 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 19:32 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-11 15:44 +0200
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 08:17 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 08:53 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 11:56 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 11:03 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 14:34 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:39 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 14:45 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 13:02 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 12:57 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-04-09 15:21 +0100
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 09:44 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? "shades@cov.net.inv" <seeu@nt.net> - 2025-04-11 20:16 +0100
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 07:35 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 11:59 -0700
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 01:08 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 20:39 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 21:40 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 03:04 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 22:49 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:08 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:27 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 04:53 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 00:48 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 06:29 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 04:24 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 02:52 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:45 -0500
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-20 12:05 +0000
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-11 06:27 +0200
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 09:58 +0000
csiph-web