Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661212

Re: S paceTime

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: S paceTime
Date 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67AB97E4.629F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <67A17706.484A@ix.netcom.com> <67A1AAC0.624F@ix.netcom.com> <67A9AB1B.71B8@ix.netcom.com> <67AB1CF3.F7F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB8F77.3FF9@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
time.."

Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth
dimension", or even the third dimension.

(or anyone else for that matter)


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein
> writes it)
> 
> it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And
> it also is biased towards Einstein.
> 
> The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
> 
> Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no
> existence out there, anywhere.
> 
> It's all in the mind.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
> >
> > space–time
> >
> > "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
> > time.
> > In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities
> > and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded
> > as obvious to any competent observer.
> > In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of
> > geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are
> > regarded as entwined,
> > so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the
> > simultaneity of distant events.
> > In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a
> > fourdimensional continuum."
> >
> > "space and time are considered as separate entities"
> >
> > > > > it's about Euclidean geometry.
> > > > >
> > > > > Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
> > >
> > > In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
> > >
> > > Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
> > > Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
> > >
> > > The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the
> > > Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination  called, SpaceTime.
> > >
> > > SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved
> > > lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical
> > > geometry.
> > >
> > > Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
> > >
> > > Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
> > >
> > > Don't you guys got anything ...real????
> > >
> > > Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30
> > > chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
> > >
> > > Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't
> > > heard anything.
> > >
> > > Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
> > >
> > > Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
  Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
    Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
    Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
      Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
        Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
          Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
            Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
              Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600

csiph-web