Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #887919

Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905
Date Thu, 06 Jun 2024 10:55:34 -0700
Organization To protect and to server
Message-ID <6661F816.3434@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <665CFEC7.6BF3@ix.netcom.com> <665F60A0.2CF3@ix.netcom.com> <lcacovFkimbU5@mid.individual.net> <66600000.3465@ix.netcom.com> <lccvsnF83tgU1@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Info paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="707982"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 240606-4, 06/06/2024), Outbound message
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654122 sci.physics:887919

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Mittwoch000005, 05.06.2024 um 08:04 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Dienstag000004, 04.06.2024 um 20:44 schrieb The Starmaker:
> >>> Now, I know most of yous need to go back to skool to Learn what is Relativity all a'bout.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Luckly, CHILDREN are learing Relativity the right way...the way Einstein intended..
> >>>
> >>> Einstein's only desire was to use the formula in his 1905 paper to build an atomic bomb.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Now children are learning how to build an atomic bomb.
> >> Well, theoretically true.
> >>
> >> But actuall bomb building is greatly limitted by lack of the parts.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You can too!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Just go back to skool.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> (Remember, most of albert einstein students worked at the manhattan project)
> >>>
> >> Einstein worked together with Leo Szillard already in Berlin.
> >
> > Leo Szillard was once a student in school and his teacher was Albert
> > Einstein.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Szilard
> >>
> >> These two (Einstein and Szillard) patented a device, which is called
> >> 'Einstein fridge'.
> >>
> >> The students who tried to replicate that fridge found, that it didn't work.
> >>
> >> The only known use of this device is as part of a fast breading reactor.
> >>
> >> So, possibly, Einstein and Szillard didn't tell the whole truth.
> >>
> >
> >
> > The Truth is, (that nobody wants to talk about)..the truth is...
> >
> >
> > NONE OF Szillard'S patents worked!
> 
> The 'Fridge' works, but isn't a fridge.


I was talking about Szillard'S patents, NOT Einstein's patents.



> 
> It is used in fast breeding reactors today.
> 
> So: why did Einstein patent a part of a fast breeding reactor in Berlin,
> long before the advent of the breeding reactor itself????
> 
> Possibly, this was not the case and the fast breeding reactor was
> already invented then and at least Einstein and Szillard knew about them
> and how they worked and what they were used for.
> 
> To cover this the name 'fridge' was used, even if the thing didn't cool.
> 
> That in turn would require some knowledge about Plutonium and what THAT
> was used for.
> 
> TH
> >
> ...


I don't know how many times I pointed out...it was Albert Einstein that
INVENTED the Nucluer Reactor.

I don't know where you got the word 'fridge' from?


But if you look at the original patent it mentions 'can also be used for
other purposes like refrideration system.'

"can also be used for" meaning Not the intended purpose.


 





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 16:22 -0700
  Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 22:12 -0700
    Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-03 10:04 -0700
    Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 x <x@x.org> - 2024-06-03 14:24 -0700
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-04 10:40 +0000
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-04 14:01 +0200
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-06-04 15:27 +0200
  Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 11:44 -0700
    Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-05 07:52 +0200
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 23:04 -0700
        Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-06 07:31 +0200
          Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-06 10:55 -0700

csiph-web