Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #887894
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 |
| Date | 2024-06-04 11:44 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <665F60A0.2CF3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <665CFEC7.6BF3@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Now, I know most of yous need to go back to skool to Learn what is Relativity all a'bout. Luckly, CHILDREN are learing Relativity the right way...the way Einstein intended.. Einstein's only desire was to use the formula in his 1905 paper to build an atomic bomb. Now children are learning how to build an atomic bomb. You can too! Just go back to skool. (Remember, most of albert einstein students worked at the manhattan project) The Starmaker wrote: > > the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 > > Most people are not aware..(expecially in this newsgroup) > > that in 1905 there was no papers by Albert Einstein entitled > > 'the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905'. > > It didn't exist. The titles have different names. > > It wasn't called the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905. > > Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when???? > > Everybody HERE call the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 > > The Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 > > but there was no such thing!!!! > > wats wrong wit you people???? > > It's INSANITY! > > There was no 'the Special Theory of Relativity' in 1905! > > Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when???? > > GET IT TOGETHER. > > do something right for once! > > you people are insane... > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 16:22 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 22:12 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-03 10:04 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 x <x@x.org> - 2024-06-03 14:24 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-04 10:40 +0000
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-04 14:01 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-06-04 15:27 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 11:44 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-05 07:52 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 23:04 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-06 07:31 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-06 10:55 -0700
csiph-web