Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #887880
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 |
| Date | 2024-06-03 10:04 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <665DF78E.69BD@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <665CFEC7.6BF3@ix.netcom.com> <665D50AE.6213@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 > > > > Most people are not aware..(expecially in this newsgroup) > > > > that in 1905 there was no papers by Albert Einstein entitled > > > > 'the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905'. > > > > It didn't exist. The titles have different names. > > > > It wasn't called the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905. > > > > Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when???? > > > > Everybody HERE call the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 > > > > The Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 > > > > but there was no such thing!!!! > > > > wats wrong wit you people???? > > > > It's INSANITY! > > > > There was no 'the Special Theory of Relativity' in 1905! > > > > Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when???? > > > > GET IT TOGETHER. > > > > do something right for once! > > > > you people are insane... > > Here are the actual titles of his 1905 papers: > > ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY CONTENT? > by A. Einstein [Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) > > Where is the title: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905???? > > The Truth...it doesn't exist. wada u do? yous go back in Time and change titles of books... yous people are into a lot of underhanded stuff.. need to keep an eye on yous Dr. Fausi people. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 16:22 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 22:12 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-03 10:04 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 x <x@x.org> - 2024-06-03 14:24 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-04 10:40 +0000
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-04 14:01 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-06-04 15:27 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 11:44 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-05 07:52 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 23:04 -0700
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-06 07:31 +0200
Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-06 10:55 -0700
csiph-web