Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #573441 > unrolled thread

Re: Einstein Lied Again

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-17 23:39 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-21 14:30 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 17:06 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-16 23:50 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 12:50 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2022-03-17 16:34 -0400
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 15:32 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 17:12 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-19 12:52 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-22 13:40 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-01 11:52 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-09 22:30 -0800
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 10:45 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 21:22 -0800
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 13:42 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 15:07 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 00:30 -0800
                  Cretinous kapo Richard Hertz comes to grips with his imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 06:57 -0800

#573441 — Re: Einstein Lied Again

On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...

https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=false


But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
in the 1940's

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1


https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1


 Einstein Lied Again


I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
everybody doesn't want everybody to know.

So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
detonate and destroy ships for the military...

But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????

 
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#573970

Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...

(it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)

So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
hands) in the same letter:

" My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg

"...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
to my thoughts."



Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
Germans wit dis!!!!"

Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
it.

Here below is the whole letter:
------------------------------------------------
On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions. 

I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
working on such a project. 

It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
 Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your   
I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
in deceiving, intimidating and  
fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
protection of peace on a supranational basis.

I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






.


On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
>
>https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=false
>
>
>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
>in the 1940's
>
>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
>
>
>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>
>
> Einstein Lied Again
>
>
>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
>
>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
>
>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
>
> 
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#573983

On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 2:31:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands... 
> 

The liar lies and it is you Starfarter...

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580471

Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
problem you have today.


Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
hands...

He wrote:
On January 23, 1950

" My sole contribution "

and then again he wrote:

 "My only contribution"


"Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.

But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!

 Einstein Lied Again
 

" My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
..."

E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg



Einstein Lied Again



***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
between 1905 and 1939.

Like for example: between 
 1905 and 1939
he was a teacher
teaching students
How To Build An Atomic Bomb.

(Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
(teachers pet)

Another example:
 between 
 1905 and 1939
Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.





On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
>
>(it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
>kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
>
>So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
>hands) in the same letter:
>
>" My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
>the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
>http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
>
>"...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
>possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
>to my thoughts."
>
>
>
>Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
>Germans wit dis!!!!"
>
>Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
>it.
>
>Here below is the whole letter:
>------------------------------------------------
>On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
>seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
>certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
>the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
>world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions. 
>
>I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
>have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
>atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
>established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
>the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
>with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
>only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
>signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
>the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
>that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
>my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
>working on such a project. 
>
>It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
>statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
>the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
>occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your   
>I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
>experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
>of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
>the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
>war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
>conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
>to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
>exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
>complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
>began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
>in deceiving, intimidating and  
>fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
>who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
>disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
>the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
>protection of peace on a supranational basis.
>
>I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
>considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
>powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so. 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>
>On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
>>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
>>
>>https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=false
>>
>>
>>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
>>in the 1940's
>>
>>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
>>
>>
>>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>>
>>
>> Einstein Lied Again
>>
>>
>>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
>>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
>>
>>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
>>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
>>
>>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
>>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
>>
>> 
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580502

Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!


but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.

Einstein Lied Again!



The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon. 




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
> problem you have today.
> 
> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
> hands...
> 
> He wrote:
> On January 23, 1950
> 
> " My sole contribution "
> 
> and then again he wrote:
> 
>  "My only contribution"
> 
> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
> 
> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
> 
>  Einstein Lied Again
> 
> 
> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
> ..."
> 
> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> 
> Einstein Lied Again
> 
> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
> between 1905 and 1939.
> 
> Like for example: between
>  1905 and 1939
> he was a teacher
> teaching students
> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
> 
> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
> (teachers pet)
> 
> Another example:
>  between
>  1905 and 1939
> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
> 
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
> >
> >(it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
> >kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
> >
> >So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
> >hands) in the same letter:
> >
> >" My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
> >the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
> >http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >
> >"...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
> >possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
> >to my thoughts."
> >
> >
> >
> >Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
> >Germans wit dis!!!!"
> >
> >Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
> >it.
> >
> >Here below is the whole letter:
> >------------------------------------------------
> >On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
> >seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
> >certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
> >the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
> >world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
> >
> >I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
> >have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
> >atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> >established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> >the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> >with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> >only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
> >signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
> >the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
> >that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
> >my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
> >working on such a project.
> >
> >It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
> >statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
> >the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
> >occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> > Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
> >I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
> >experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
> >of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
> >the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
> >war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
> >conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
> >to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
> >exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
> >complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
> >began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
> >in deceiving, intimidating and
> >fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
> >who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
> >disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
> >the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
> >protection of peace on a supranational basis.
> >
> >I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
> >considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
> >powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> >>
>   https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=fal
> >>
> >>
> >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> >>in the 1940's
> >>
> >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> >>
> >>
> >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> >>
> >>
> >> Einstein Lied Again
> >>
> >>
> >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> >>
> >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> >>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> >>
> >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> >>
> >>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580507

On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
> that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
> 
> 
> but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
> 
> Einstein Lied Again!
> 
> 
> 
> The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon. 
> 
> 


Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).

The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.




> 
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
>> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
>> problem you have today.
>>
>> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
>> hands...
>>
>> He wrote:
>> On January 23, 1950
>>
>> " My sole contribution "
>>
>> and then again he wrote:
>>
>>  "My only contribution"
>>
>> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
>>
>> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
>>
>>  Einstein Lied Again
>>
>>
>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
>> ..."
>>
>> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
>>
>> Einstein Lied Again
>>
>> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
>> between 1905 and 1939.
>>
>> Like for example: between
>>  1905 and 1939
>> he was a teacher
>> teaching students
>> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
>>
>> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
>> (teachers pet)
>>
>> Another example:
>>  between
>>  1905 and 1939
>> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
>> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
>>>
>>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
>>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
>>>
>>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
>>> hands) in the same letter:
>>>
>>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
>>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
>>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
>>>
>>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
>>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
>>> to my thoughts."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
>>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
>>>
>>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Here below is the whole letter:
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
>>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
>>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
>>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
>>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
>>>
>>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
>>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
>>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
>>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
>>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
>>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
>>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
>>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
>>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
>>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
>>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
>>> working on such a project.
>>>
>>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
>>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
>>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
>>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
>>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
>>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
>>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
>>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
>>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
>>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
>>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
>>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
>>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
>>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
>>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
>>> in deceiving, intimidating and
>>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
>>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
>>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
>>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
>>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
>>>
>>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
>>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
>>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
>>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
>>>>
>>   https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=fal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
>>>> in the 1940's
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Einstein Lied Again
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
>>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
>>>>
>>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
>>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
>>>>
>>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
>>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>>  the unchallengeable.
> 


-- 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-

*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html

*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
enough to finish it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580509

Biden has only been President for one year, with 3 more years left to go...

in 3 years Putin can take over Half The Planet!

Who is going to stop him???? 

It takes BRUTE FORCE to stop him. 


The earth is up for grabs.

Opportunity only comes once in a while like this...


smash and grab.


Now, the only way to stop a World War 3 and to end this once and for all...NOW, is...

for the president of China Xi to interverne and say, "Okay, that's enough yous two!"


Xi takes Putin and Biden
and puts them on the table
and work out a real deal.

Because the Truth is, Xi thinks he owns the planet.

And he sees Putin and Biden like little kids on the block.

Of course I don't trust that fuckin chink. 


he's gonna want something in returm...give him
all the laundrymats.

no tickie, no shirty.







BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> 
> On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
> > that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
> >
> >
> > but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
> >
> > Einstein Lied Again!
> >
> >
> >
> > The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon.
> >
> >
> 
> Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
> inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).
> 
> The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
> and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.
> 
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
> >> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
> >> problem you have today.
> >>
> >> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
> >> hands...
> >>
> >> He wrote:
> >> On January 23, 1950
> >>
> >> " My sole contribution "
> >>
> >> and then again he wrote:
> >>
> >>  "My only contribution"
> >>
> >> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
> >>
> >> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
> >>
> >>  Einstein Lied Again
> >>
> >>
> >> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> >> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> >> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> >> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> >> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
> >> ..."
> >>
> >> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
> >> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >>
> >> Einstein Lied Again
> >>
> >> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
> >> between 1905 and 1939.
> >>
> >> Like for example: between
> >>  1905 and 1939
> >> he was a teacher
> >> teaching students
> >> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
> >>
> >> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
> >> (teachers pet)
> >>
> >> Another example:
> >>  between
> >>  1905 and 1939
> >> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
> >> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
> >>>
> >>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
> >>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
> >>>
> >>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
> >>> hands) in the same letter:
> >>>
> >>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
> >>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
> >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >>>
> >>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
> >>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
> >>> to my thoughts."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
> >>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
> >>>
> >>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
> >>> it.
> >>>
> >>> Here below is the whole letter:
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
> >>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
> >>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
> >>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
> >>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
> >>>
> >>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
> >>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
> >>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> >>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> >>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> >>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> >>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
> >>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
> >>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
> >>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
> >>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
> >>> working on such a project.
> >>>
> >>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
> >>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
> >>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
> >>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> >>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
> >>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
> >>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
> >>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
> >>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
> >>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
> >>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
> >>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
> >>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
> >>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
> >>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
> >>> in deceiving, intimidating and
> >>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
> >>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
> >>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
> >>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
> >>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
> >>>
> >>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
> >>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
> >>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> >>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> >>>>
>      https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> >>>> in the 1940's
> >>>>
> >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Einstein Lied Again
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> >>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> >>>>
> >>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> >>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> >>>>
> >>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> >>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>  the unchallengeable.
> >
> 
> --
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> -That's Karma-
> 
> *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
> *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
> censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
> prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
> find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
> you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
> Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
> a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
> https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
> 
> *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
> 202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
> but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
> enough to finish it.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580513

So, here's the deal..

Xi takes Putin and Biden
 and puts them on the table
 and work out a real deal.


Then Xi tells Biden and Putin..

"I'm making the peace between the two of yous. If
both of yous don't agree on these terms, then
I DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF YOUS BLOWS YOURSELVES UP!
I'll just come in afterwards and take whatever is left.
I'LL THEN RULE THE FUCKIN WORLD!"


The Starmaker





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Biden has only been President for one year, with 3 more years left to go...
> 
> in 3 years Putin can take over Half The Planet!
> 
> Who is going to stop him????
> 
> It takes BRUTE FORCE to stop him.
> 
> The earth is up for grabs.
> 
> Opportunity only comes once in a while like this...
> 
> smash and grab.
> 
> Now, the only way to stop a World War 3 and to end this once and for all...NOW, is...
> 
> for the president of China Xi to interverne and say, "Okay, that's enough yous two!"
> 
> Xi takes Putin and Biden
> and puts them on the table
> and work out a real deal.
> 
> Because the Truth is, Xi thinks he owns the planet.
> 
> And he sees Putin and Biden like little kids on the block.
> 
> Of course I don't trust that fuckin chink.
> 
> he's gonna want something in returm...give him
> all the laundrymats.
> 
> no tickie, no shirty.
> 
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >
> > On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
> > > that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
> > >
> > >
> > > but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
> > >
> > > Einstein Lied Again!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
> > inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).
> >
> > The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
> > and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
> > >> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
> > >> problem you have today.
> > >>
> > >> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
> > >> hands...
> > >>
> > >> He wrote:
> > >> On January 23, 1950
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution "
> > >>
> > >> and then again he wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  "My only contribution"
> > >>
> > >> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
> > >>
> > >> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
> > >>
> > >>  Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
> > >> ..."
> > >>
> > >> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
> > >> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>
> > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
> > >> between 1905 and 1939.
> > >>
> > >> Like for example: between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> he was a teacher
> > >> teaching students
> > >> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
> > >>
> > >> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
> > >> (teachers pet)
> > >>
> > >> Another example:
> > >>  between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
> > >> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
> > >>>
> > >>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
> > >>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
> > >>>
> > >>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
> > >>> hands) in the same letter:
> > >>>
> > >>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
> > >>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
> > >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>>
> > >>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
> > >>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
> > >>> to my thoughts."
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
> > >>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
> > >>>
> > >>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
> > >>> it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here below is the whole letter:
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------
> > >>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
> > >>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
> > >>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
> > >>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
> > >>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
> > >>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
> > >>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
> > >>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
> > >>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
> > >>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
> > >>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
> > >>> working on such a project.
> > >>>
> > >>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
> > >>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
> > >>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
> > >>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> > >>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
> > >>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
> > >>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
> > >>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
> > >>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
> > >>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
> > >>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
> > >>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
> > >>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
> > >>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
> > >>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
> > >>> in deceiving, intimidating and
> > >>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
> > >>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
> > >>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
> > >>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
> > >>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
> > >>>
> > >>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
> > >>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
> > >>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
> > >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> .
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > >>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > >>>>
>        https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20januar
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > >>>> in the 1940's
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > >>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > >>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > >>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > -That's Karma-
> >
> > *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
> > *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
> > censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
> > prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
> > find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
> > you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
> > Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
> > a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
> > https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
> >
> > *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
> > 202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
> > but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
> > enough to finish it.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580601

In just one month, Putin did a Smash & Grab of Ukraine.

With Biden as President...Putin can Smash & Grab all of Europe
in less than 3 years!

Who exist today in power with BRUTE FORCE that can stop Putin now? Any names??

I don't see anybody...do you?



I don't know why Ukranians are running to Poland...Poland is NEXT!


Who exist today in power with BRUTE FORCE that can stop Putin now?


How about next week?

How about next month??

How about 2023? time flies when you're having fun...



[WHISPER} i'm sure behind the scenes they are talking about getting rid of Biden but
they don't know what to do with Kamala. maybe hit two birds with one stone.
i'm sure hillary clinton is working on it right now. (she wants to be the first woman president of the united states, but
she cannot do that with kamala still around.)  




  


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Biden has only been President for one year, with 3 more years left to go...
> 
> in 3 years Putin can take over Half The Planet!
> 
> Who is going to stop him????
> 
> It takes BRUTE FORCE to stop him.
> 
> The earth is up for grabs.
> 
> Opportunity only comes once in a while like this...
> 
> smash and grab.
> 
> Now, the only way to stop a World War 3 and to end this once and for all...NOW, is...
> 
> for the president of China Xi to interverne and say, "Okay, that's enough yous two!"
> 
> Xi takes Putin and Biden
> and puts them on the table
> and work out a real deal.
> 
> Because the Truth is, Xi thinks he owns the planet.
> 
> And he sees Putin and Biden like little kids on the block.
> 
> Of course I don't trust that fuckin chink.
> 
> he's gonna want something in returm...give him
> all the laundrymats.
> 
> no tickie, no shirty.
> 
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >
> > On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
> > > that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
> > >
> > >
> > > but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
> > >
> > > Einstein Lied Again!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
> > inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).
> >
> > The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
> > and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
> > >> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
> > >> problem you have today.
> > >>
> > >> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
> > >> hands...
> > >>
> > >> He wrote:
> > >> On January 23, 1950
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution "
> > >>
> > >> and then again he wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  "My only contribution"
> > >>
> > >> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
> > >>
> > >> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
> > >>
> > >>  Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
> > >> ..."
> > >>
> > >> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
> > >> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>
> > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
> > >> between 1905 and 1939.
> > >>
> > >> Like for example: between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> he was a teacher
> > >> teaching students
> > >> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
> > >>
> > >> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
> > >> (teachers pet)
> > >>
> > >> Another example:
> > >>  between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
> > >> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
> > >>>
> > >>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
> > >>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
> > >>>
> > >>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
> > >>> hands) in the same letter:
> > >>>
> > >>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
> > >>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
> > >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>>
> > >>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
> > >>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
> > >>> to my thoughts."
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
> > >>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
> > >>>
> > >>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
> > >>> it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here below is the whole letter:
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------
> > >>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
> > >>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
> > >>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
> > >>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
> > >>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
> > >>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
> > >>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
> > >>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
> > >>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
> > >>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
> > >>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
> > >>> working on such a project.
> > >>>
> > >>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
> > >>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
> > >>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
> > >>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> > >>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
> > >>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
> > >>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
> > >>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
> > >>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
> > >>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
> > >>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
> > >>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
> > >>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
> > >>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
> > >>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
> > >>> in deceiving, intimidating and
> > >>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
> > >>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
> > >>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
> > >>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
> > >>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
> > >>>
> > >>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
> > >>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
> > >>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
> > >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> .
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > >>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > >>>>
>        https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20januar
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > >>>> in the 1940's
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > >>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > >>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > >>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > -That's Karma-
> >
> > *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
> > *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
> > censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
> > prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
> > find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
> > you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
> > Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
> > a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
> > https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
> >
> > *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
> > 202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
> > but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
> > enough to finish it.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#580761

You know the world are going to get tired of the episode 
Smash & Grab of Ukraine...

everybody wants the new episode

Smash & Grab of Poland!

But, but...when is it coming out???










On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:52:26 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>In just one month, Putin did a Smash & Grab of Ukraine.
>
>With Biden as President...Putin can Smash & Grab all of Europe
>in less than 3 years!
>
>Who exist today in power with BRUTE FORCE that can stop Putin now? Any names??
>
>I don't see anybody...do you?
>
>
>
>I don't know why Ukranians are running to Poland...Poland is NEXT!
>
>
>Who exist today in power with BRUTE FORCE that can stop Putin now?
>
>
>How about next week?
>
>How about next month??
>
>How about 2023? time flies when you're having fun...
>
>
>
>[WHISPER} i'm sure behind the scenes they are talking about getting rid of Biden but
>they don't know what to do with Kamala. maybe hit two birds with one stone.
>i'm sure hillary clinton is working on it right now. (she wants to be the first woman president of the united states, but
>she cannot do that with kamala still around.)  
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> Biden has only been President for one year, with 3 more years left to go...
>> 
>> in 3 years Putin can take over Half The Planet!
>> 
>> Who is going to stop him????
>> 
>> It takes BRUTE FORCE to stop him.
>> 
>> The earth is up for grabs.
>> 
>> Opportunity only comes once in a while like this...
>> 
>> smash and grab.
>> 
>> Now, the only way to stop a World War 3 and to end this once and for all...NOW, is...
>> 
>> for the president of China Xi to interverne and say, "Okay, that's enough yous two!"
>> 
>> Xi takes Putin and Biden
>> and puts them on the table
>> and work out a real deal.
>> 
>> Because the Truth is, Xi thinks he owns the planet.
>> 
>> And he sees Putin and Biden like little kids on the block.
>> 
>> Of course I don't trust that fuckin chink.
>> 
>> he's gonna want something in returm...give him
>> all the laundrymats.
>> 
>> no tickie, no shirty.
>> 
>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> >
>> > On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
>> > > that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
>> > >
>> > > Einstein Lied Again!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
>> > inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).
>> >
>> > The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
>> > and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
>> > >> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
>> > >> problem you have today.
>> > >>
>> > >> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
>> > >> hands...
>> > >>
>> > >> He wrote:
>> > >> On January 23, 1950
>> > >>
>> > >> " My sole contribution "
>> > >>
>> > >> and then again he wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>  "My only contribution"
>> > >>
>> > >> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
>> > >>
>> > >> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
>> > >>
>> > >>  Einstein Lied Again
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
>> > >> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
>> > >> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
>> > >> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
>> > >> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
>> > >> ..."
>> > >>
>> > >> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
>> > >> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
>> > >>
>> > >> Einstein Lied Again
>> > >>
>> > >> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
>> > >> between 1905 and 1939.
>> > >>
>> > >> Like for example: between
>> > >>  1905 and 1939
>> > >> he was a teacher
>> > >> teaching students
>> > >> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
>> > >>
>> > >> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
>> > >> (teachers pet)
>> > >>
>> > >> Another example:
>> > >>  between
>> > >>  1905 and 1939
>> > >> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
>> > >> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
>> > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
>> > >>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
>> > >>> hands) in the same letter:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
>> > >>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
>> > >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
>> > >>>
>> > >>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
>> > >>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
>> > >>> to my thoughts."
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
>> > >>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
>> > >>> it.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Here below is the whole letter:
>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------
>> > >>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
>> > >>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
>> > >>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
>> > >>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
>> > >>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
>> > >>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
>> > >>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
>> > >>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
>> > >>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
>> > >>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
>> > >>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
>> > >>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
>> > >>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
>> > >>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
>> > >>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
>> > >>> working on such a project.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
>> > >>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
>> > >>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
>> > >>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
>> > >>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
>> > >>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
>> > >>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
>> > >>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
>> > >>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
>> > >>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
>> > >>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
>> > >>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
>> > >>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
>> > >>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
>> > >>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
>> > >>> in deceiving, intimidating and
>> > >>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
>> > >>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
>> > >>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
>> > >>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
>> > >>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
>> > >>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
>> > >>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
>> > >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> .
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
>> > >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
>> > >>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
>> > >>>>
>>        https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20januar
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
>> > >>>> in the 1940's
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Einstein Lied Again
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
>> > >>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
>> > >>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
>> > >>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >> --
>> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>> > >>  the unchallengeable.
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > -That's Karma-
>> >
>> > *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
>> > *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
>> > censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
>> > prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
>> > find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
>> > you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
>> > Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
>> > a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
>> > https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
>> >
>> > *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
>> > 202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
>> > but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
>> > enough to finish it.
>> 
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>>  the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575261

On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
>
>https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=false
>
>
>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
>in the 1940's
>
>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
>
>
>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>
>
> Einstein Lied Again
>
>
>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
>
>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
>
>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????

Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.

For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!

They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????

Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
other Military had a problem...

"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."


Albert Einstein wrote:

"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
you were visiting me
it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
to explosion
a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
would like to submit to you for your judgement.
S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
S.
The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
when
the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
the
nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
is
now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
to
the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
goes
again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein 


 

"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."


I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
solve their ..."detonation" problem.
















--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576669

Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein
got paid $25.00 a day to help the military
with their denotation missile explosion problem..

He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at
the military...
Why do you suppose the military thought Albert
Einstein could help them in that department?

Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past
having to do with missile explosions or ant
High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe?

But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!!

wat comes to mind?


"extremely powerful bombs of a new type"????

"This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,

and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely
powerful
 bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this

type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy

the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.
However,

such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

air." --Albert Einstein

https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first





On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
>>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
>>
>>https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=false
>>
>>
>>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
>>in the 1940's
>>
>>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
>>
>>
>>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>>
>>
>> Einstein Lied Again
>>
>>
>>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
>>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
>>
>>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
>>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
>>
>>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
>>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
>
>Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
>ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.
>
>For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!
>
>They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????
>
>Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
>other Military had a problem...
>
>"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
>itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
>an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
>up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
>energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
>stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
>entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
>difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
>
>
>Albert Einstein wrote:
>
>"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
>you were visiting me
>it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
>to explosion
>a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
>I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
>would like to submit to you for your judgement.
>S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
>vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
>serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
>S.
>The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
>by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
>when
>the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
>influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
>vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
>enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
>When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
>the
>nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
>magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
>is
>now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
>to
>the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
>the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
>again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
>explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
>contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
>goes
>again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein 
>
>
> 
>
>"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
>most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
>
>
>I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
>solve their ..."detonation" problem.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576721

Here is a photo of Albert Einstein working with Lt. Stephen Brunauer who was in charge
of the "High Explosives Division".  

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666/photo/1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLQTpWXUYAMP8cm?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


Albert Einstein never had any problem getting 'security clearances' ...


But, if they ask me to kill Japs and Krauts, I would ask for more than $25.00 a day.




"it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
to explosion a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose." --Albert Einstein in a letter to Lt. Stephen Brunauer






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein
> got paid $25.00 a day to help the military
> with their denotation missile explosion problem..
> 
> He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at
> the military...
> Why do you suppose the military thought Albert
> Einstein could help them in that department?
> 
> Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past
> having to do with missile explosions or ant
> High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe?
> 
> But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!!
> 
> wat comes to mind?
> 
> "extremely powerful bombs of a new type"????
> 
> "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> 
> and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely
> powerful
>  bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.
> However,
> 
> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> 
> air." --Albert Einstein
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> >>
>   https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=fal
> >>
> >>
> >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> >>in the 1940's
> >>
> >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> >>
> >>
> >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> >>
> >>
> >> Einstein Lied Again
> >>
> >>
> >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> >>
> >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> >>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> >>
> >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> >
> >Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
> >ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.
> >
> >For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!
> >
> >They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????
> >
> >Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
> >other Military had a problem...
> >
> >"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
> >itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
> >an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
> >up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
> >energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
> >stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
> >entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
> >difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> >
> >
> >Albert Einstein wrote:
> >
> >"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
> >you were visiting me
> >it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> >to explosion
> >a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> >I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> >would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> >S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
> >vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> >serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
> >S.
> >The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
> >by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
> >when
> >the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> >influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> >vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> >enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> >When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
> >the
> >nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> >magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
> >is
> >now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
> >to
> >the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> >the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> >again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> >explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> >contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
> >goes
> >again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
> >most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> >
> >
> >I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
> >solve their ..."detonation" problem.
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576778

Here is what Lt. Stephen Brunauer had to say...


"Einstein's security clearance was ob-
tained very quickly, and the contract was
signed on May 31. Soon after that, I made
my second trip to Einstein, taking to him
for consideration one of the toughest
problems that puzzled us at that time. The
problem was whether the detonation of a
torpedo should be initiated in the front or
in the rear. The three most important
characteristics of the shock wave pro-
duced in a detonation are the peak pres-
sure, the impulse or momentum of the
shock wave, which includes the duration
of the shock, and the energy released in
the explosion. If in a torpedo the detona-
tion of the high explosive is initiated at
the forward end, one obtains the highest
peak pressure. If the detonation is ini-
tiated in the rear end, one obtains the
highest momentum. The energy de-
veloped is the same, regardless where the
explosion is initiated. So the ques-
tion was which of the three main char-
acteristics causes the most damage. If it
is the peak pressure, the explosion should
be initiated at the front end of the tor-
pedo; if it is momentum, it should be
initiated at the rear end, and if it is the
energy, the location of the initiation does
not make any difference.
Einstein was thinking about the prob-
lem for about ten minutes, and finally
chose momentum and gave the reasons.
But a few days later I received a letter
from him telling me that he gave much
further thought to the matter, and changed
his conclusion. He decided that the
energy developed in the explosion was
the most important factor, and gave his
reasons. Very expensive experiments
performed much later showed that he was
right. Of course this subject was highly
confidential during the war, but I hope
that now--thirty-five years later-it
is declassified."  --Lt. Stephen Brunauer, head of the High Explosives Division


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Here is a photo of Albert Einstein working with Lt. Stephen Brunauer who was in charge
> of the "High Explosives Division".
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666/photo/1
> 
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLQTpWXUYAMP8cm?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> Albert Einstein never had any problem getting 'security clearances' ...
> 
> But, if they ask me to kill Japs and Krauts, I would ask for more than $25.00 a day.
> 
> "it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> to explosion a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose." --Albert Einstein in a letter to Lt. Stephen Brunauer
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein
> > got paid $25.00 a day to help the military
> > with their denotation missile explosion problem..
> >
> > He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at
> > the military...
> > Why do you suppose the military thought Albert
> > Einstein could help them in that department?
> >
> > Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past
> > having to do with missile explosions or ant
> > High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe?
> >
> > But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!!
> >
> > wat comes to mind?
> >
> > "extremely powerful bombs of a new type"????
> >
> > "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> >
> > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely
> > powerful
> >  bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> >
> > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> >
> > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.
> > However,
> >
> > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> >
> > air." --Albert Einstein
> >
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >
> > On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > >>
>     https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > >>in the 1940's
> > >>
> > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > >>
> > >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > >>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > >>
> > >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > >
> > >Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
> > >ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.
> > >
> > >For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!
> > >
> > >They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????
> > >
> > >Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
> > >other Military had a problem...
> > >
> > >"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
> > >itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
> > >an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
> > >up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
> > >energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
> > >stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
> > >entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
> > >difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> > >
> > >
> > >Albert Einstein wrote:
> > >
> > >"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
> > >you were visiting me
> > >it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> > >to explosion
> > >a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > >I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> > >would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> > >S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
> > >vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> > >serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
> > >S.
> > >The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
> > >by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
> > >when
> > >the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> > >influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> > >vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> > >enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> > >When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
> > >the
> > >nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> > >magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
> > >is
> > >now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
> > >to
> > >the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> > >the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> > >again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> > >explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> > >contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
> > >goes
> > >again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
> > >most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> > >
> > >
> > >I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
> > >solve their ..."detonation" problem.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576861

So, ...Albert Einstein continued on with developing
New and More effective High Explosives for the
Navy, AND the Army, AND the Air Force...that were used
in the war against Germany and Japan, the
Korean war and the Vietnam war.



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Here is what Lt. Stephen Brunauer had to say...
> 
> "Einstein's security clearance was ob-
> tained very quickly, and the contract was
> signed on May 31. Soon after that, I made
> my second trip to Einstein, taking to him
> for consideration one of the toughest
> problems that puzzled us at that time. The
> problem was whether the detonation of a
> torpedo should be initiated in the front or
> in the rear. The three most important
> characteristics of the shock wave pro-
> duced in a detonation are the peak pres-
> sure, the impulse or momentum of the
> shock wave, which includes the duration
> of the shock, and the energy released in
> the explosion. If in a torpedo the detona-
> tion of the high explosive is initiated at
> the forward end, one obtains the highest
> peak pressure. If the detonation is ini-
> tiated in the rear end, one obtains the
> highest momentum. The energy de-
> veloped is the same, regardless where the
> explosion is initiated. So the ques-
> tion was which of the three main char-
> acteristics causes the most damage. If it
> is the peak pressure, the explosion should
> be initiated at the front end of the tor-
> pedo; if it is momentum, it should be
> initiated at the rear end, and if it is the
> energy, the location of the initiation does
> not make any difference.
> Einstein was thinking about the prob-
> lem for about ten minutes, and finally
> chose momentum and gave the reasons.
> But a few days later I received a letter
> from him telling me that he gave much
> further thought to the matter, and changed
> his conclusion. He decided that the
> energy developed in the explosion was
> the most important factor, and gave his
> reasons. Very expensive experiments
> performed much later showed that he was
> right. Of course this subject was highly
> confidential during the war, but I hope
> that now--thirty-five years later-it
> is declassified."  --Lt. Stephen Brunauer, head of the High Explosives Division
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Here is a photo of Albert Einstein working with Lt. Stephen Brunauer who was in charge
> > of the "High Explosives Division".
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLQTpWXUYAMP8cm?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > Albert Einstein never had any problem getting 'security clearances' ...
> >
> > But, if they ask me to kill Japs and Krauts, I would ask for more than $25.00 a day.
> >
> > "it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> > to explosion a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose." --Albert Einstein in a letter to Lt. Stephen Brunauer
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein
> > > got paid $25.00 a day to help the military
> > > with their denotation missile explosion problem..
> > >
> > > He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at
> > > the military...
> > > Why do you suppose the military thought Albert
> > > Einstein could help them in that department?
> > >
> > > Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past
> > > having to do with missile explosions or ant
> > > High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe?
> > >
> > > But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!!
> > >
> > > wat comes to mind?
> > >
> > > "extremely powerful bombs of a new type"????
> > >
> > > "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> > >
> > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely
> > > powerful
> > >  bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> > >
> > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> > >
> > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.
> > > However,
> > >
> > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> > >
> > > air." --Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > >
> > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > > >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > > >>
>       https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > > >>in the 1940's
> > > >>
> > > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > > >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > > >>
> > > >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > > >>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > > >>
> > > >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > > >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > > >
> > > >Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
> > > >ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.
> > > >
> > > >For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!
> > > >
> > > >They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????
> > > >
> > > >Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
> > > >other Military had a problem...
> > > >
> > > >"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
> > > >itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
> > > >an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
> > > >up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
> > > >energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
> > > >stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
> > > >entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
> > > >difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Albert Einstein wrote:
> > > >
> > > >"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
> > > >you were visiting me
> > > >it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> > > >to explosion
> > > >a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > >I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> > > >would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> > > >S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
> > > >vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> > > >serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
> > > >S.
> > > >The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
> > > >by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
> > > >when
> > > >the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> > > >influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> > > >vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> > > >enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> > > >When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
> > > >the
> > > >nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> > > >magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
> > > >is
> > > >now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
> > > >to
> > > >the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> > > >the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> > > >again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> > > >explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> > > >contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
> > > >goes
> > > >again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
> > > >most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
> > > >solve their ..."detonation" problem.
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576869

Yet, On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
part in work of a military-technical nature...


Einstein Lied Again!



Einstein knew that all his information would be
classfied and confidental...


so why not lie?



You cannot even talk about it if it is CLASSIFIED!


Albert Einstein fuckin LIED!


He lied to everybody!


Then he sticks his tongue out at you....


(because he thinks you are all a bunch of lizards...)


https://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2017/07/einsteintongue.jpg


 







 


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> So, ...Albert Einstein continued on with developing
> New and More effective High Explosives for the
> Navy, AND the Army, AND the Air Force...that were used
> in the war against Germany and Japan, the
> Korean war and the Vietnam war.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Here is what Lt. Stephen Brunauer had to say...
> >
> > "Einstein's security clearance was ob-
> > tained very quickly, and the contract was
> > signed on May 31. Soon after that, I made
> > my second trip to Einstein, taking to him
> > for consideration one of the toughest
> > problems that puzzled us at that time. The
> > problem was whether the detonation of a
> > torpedo should be initiated in the front or
> > in the rear. The three most important
> > characteristics of the shock wave pro-
> > duced in a detonation are the peak pres-
> > sure, the impulse or momentum of the
> > shock wave, which includes the duration
> > of the shock, and the energy released in
> > the explosion. If in a torpedo the detona-
> > tion of the high explosive is initiated at
> > the forward end, one obtains the highest
> > peak pressure. If the detonation is ini-
> > tiated in the rear end, one obtains the
> > highest momentum. The energy de-
> > veloped is the same, regardless where the
> > explosion is initiated. So the ques-
> > tion was which of the three main char-
> > acteristics causes the most damage. If it
> > is the peak pressure, the explosion should
> > be initiated at the front end of the tor-
> > pedo; if it is momentum, it should be
> > initiated at the rear end, and if it is the
> > energy, the location of the initiation does
> > not make any difference.
> > Einstein was thinking about the prob-
> > lem for about ten minutes, and finally
> > chose momentum and gave the reasons.
> > But a few days later I received a letter
> > from him telling me that he gave much
> > further thought to the matter, and changed
> > his conclusion. He decided that the
> > energy developed in the explosion was
> > the most important factor, and gave his
> > reasons. Very expensive experiments
> > performed much later showed that he was
> > right. Of course this subject was highly
> > confidential during the war, but I hope
> > that now--thirty-five years later-it
> > is declassified."  --Lt. Stephen Brunauer, head of the High Explosives Division
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is a photo of Albert Einstein working with Lt. Stephen Brunauer who was in charge
> > > of the "High Explosives Division".
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666/photo/1
> > >
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLQTpWXUYAMP8cm?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein never had any problem getting 'security clearances' ...
> > >
> > > But, if they ask me to kill Japs and Krauts, I would ask for more than $25.00 a day.
> > >
> > > "it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> > > to explosion a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose." --Albert Einstein in a letter to Lt. Stephen Brunauer
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein
> > > > got paid $25.00 a day to help the military
> > > > with their denotation missile explosion problem..
> > > >
> > > > He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at
> > > > the military...
> > > > Why do you suppose the military thought Albert
> > > > Einstein could help them in that department?
> > > >
> > > > Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past
> > > > having to do with missile explosions or ant
> > > > High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe?
> > > >
> > > > But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!!
> > > >
> > > > wat comes to mind?
> > > >
> > > > "extremely powerful bombs of a new type"????
> > > >
> > > > "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> > > >
> > > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely
> > > > powerful
> > > >  bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> > > >
> > > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> > > >
> > > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.
> > > > However,
> > > >
> > > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> > > >
> > > > air." --Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > > > >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > > > >>
>         https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > > > >>in the 1940's
> > > > >>
> > > > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > > > >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > > > >>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > > > >>
> > > > >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > > > >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > > > >
> > > > >Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
> > > > >ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.
> > > > >
> > > > >For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!
> > > > >
> > > > >They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????
> > > > >
> > > > >Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
> > > > >other Military had a problem...
> > > > >
> > > > >"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
> > > > >itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
> > > > >an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
> > > > >up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
> > > > >energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
> > > > >stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
> > > > >entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
> > > > >difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Albert Einstein wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
> > > > >you were visiting me
> > > > >it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> > > > >to explosion
> > > > >a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > > >I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> > > > >would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> > > > >S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
> > > > >vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> > > > >serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
> > > > >S.
> > > > >The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
> > > > >by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
> > > > >when
> > > > >the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> > > > >influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> > > > >vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> > > > >enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> > > > >When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
> > > > >the
> > > > >nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> > > > >magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
> > > > >is
> > > > >now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
> > > > >to
> > > > >the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> > > > >the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> > > > >again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> > > > >explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> > > > >contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
> > > > >goes
> > > > >again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
> > > > >most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
> > > > >solve their ..."detonation" problem.
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#577173

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 8:07:03 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> Yet, On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter.. I have never taken 
> part in work of a military-technical nature... 
> 
> 
> Einstein Lied Again! 
> 
> 
> 
> Einstein knew that all his information would be 
> classfied and confidental... 
> 
> 
> so why not lie? 
> 
> 
> 
> You cannot even talk about it if it is CLASSIFIED! 
> 
> 
> Albert Einstein fuckin LIED! 
> 
> 
> He lied to everybody! 
> 
> 
> Then he sticks his tongue out at you.... 
> 
> 
> (because he thinks you are all a bunch of lizards...) 
> 
> 
> https://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2017/07/einsteintongue.jpg
> The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > So, ...Albert Einstein continued on with developing 
> > New and More effective High Explosives for the 
> > Navy, AND the Army, AND the Air Force...that were used 
> > in the war against Germany and Japan, the 
> > Korean war and the Vietnam war. 
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Here is what Lt. Stephen Brunauer had to say... 
> > > 
> > > "Einstein's security clearance was ob- 
> > > tained very quickly, and the contract was 
> > > signed on May 31. Soon after that, I made 
> > > my second trip to Einstein, taking to him 
> > > for consideration one of the toughest 
> > > problems that puzzled us at that time. The 
> > > problem was whether the detonation of a 
> > > torpedo should be initiated in the front or 
> > > in the rear. The three most important 
> > > characteristics of the shock wave pro- 
> > > duced in a detonation are the peak pres- 
> > > sure, the impulse or momentum of the 
> > > shock wave, which includes the duration 
> > > of the shock, and the energy released in 
> > > the explosion. If in a torpedo the detona- 
> > > tion of the high explosive is initiated at 
> > > the forward end, one obtains the highest 
> > > peak pressure. If the detonation is ini- 
> > > tiated in the rear end, one obtains the 
> > > highest momentum. The energy de- 
> > > veloped is the same, regardless where the 
> > > explosion is initiated. So the ques- 
> > > tion was which of the three main char- 
> > > acteristics causes the most damage. If it 
> > > is the peak pressure, the explosion should 
> > > be initiated at the front end of the tor- 
> > > pedo; if it is momentum, it should be 
> > > initiated at the rear end, and if it is the 
> > > energy, the location of the initiation does 
> > > not make any difference. 
> > > Einstein was thinking about the prob- 
> > > lem for about ten minutes, and finally 
> > > chose momentum and gave the reasons. 
> > > But a few days later I received a letter 
> > > from him telling me that he gave much 
> > > further thought to the matter, and changed 
> > > his conclusion. He decided that the 
> > > energy developed in the explosion was 
> > > the most important factor, and gave his 
> > > reasons. Very expensive experiments 
> > > performed much later showed that he was 
> > > right. Of course this subject was highly 
> > > confidential during the war, but I hope 
> > > that now--thirty-five years later-it 
> > > is declassified." --Lt. Stephen Brunauer, head of the High Explosives Division 
> > > 
> > > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > Here is a photo of Albert Einstein working with Lt. Stephen Brunauer who was in charge 
> > > > of the "High Explosives Division". 
> > > > 
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666/photo/1 
> > > > 
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLQTpWXUYAMP8cm?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 
> > > > 
> > > > Albert Einstein never had any problem getting 'security clearances' ... 
> > > > 
> > > > But, if they ask me to kill Japs and Krauts, I would ask for more than $25.00 a day. 
> > > > 
> > > > "it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings 
> > > > to explosion a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment. 
> > > > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose." --Albert Einstein in a letter to Lt. Stephen Brunauer 
> > > > 
> > > > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein 
> > > > > got paid $25.00 a day to help the military 
> > > > > with their denotation missile explosion problem.. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at 
> > > > > the military... 
> > > > > Why do you suppose the military thought Albert 
> > > > > Einstein could help them in that department? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past 
> > > > > having to do with missile explosions or ant 
> > > > > High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!! 
> > > > > 
> > > > > wat comes to mind? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "extremely powerful bombs of a new type"???? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, 
> > > > > 
> > > > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely 
> > > > > powerful 
> > > > > bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this 
> > > > > 
> > > > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy 
> > > > > 
> > > > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. 
> > > > > However, 
> > > > > 
> > > > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by 
> > > > > 
> > > > > air." --Albert Einstein 
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker 
> > > > > <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker 
> > > > > ><star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter.. I have never taken 
> > > > > >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ... 
> > > > > >> 
> > https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas 
> > > > > >>in the 1940's 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >> Einstein Lied Again 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems 
> > > > > >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know. 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to 
> > > > > >>detonate and destroy ships for the military... 
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that 
> > > > > >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert???? 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese 
> > > > > >ship! Their missiles simply didn't work. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship! 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert???? 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the 
> > > > > >other Military had a problem... 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not 
> > > > > >itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have 
> > > > > >an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build 
> > > > > >up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear 
> > > > > >energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction 
> > > > > >stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This 
> > > > > >entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most 
> > > > > >difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb." 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >Albert Einstein wrote: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when 
> > > > > >you were visiting me 
> > > > > >it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings 
> > > > > >to explosion 
> > > > > >a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment. 
> > > > > >I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I 
> > > > > >would like to submit to you for your judgement. 
> > > > > >S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with 
> > > > > >vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in 
> > > > > >serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to 
> > > > > >S. 
> > > > > >The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied 
> > > > > >by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment 
> > > > > >when 
> > > > > >the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic 
> > > > > >influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will 
> > > > > >vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep 
> > > > > >enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it. 
> > > > > >When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through 
> > > > > >the 
> > > > > >nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative 
> > > > > >magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There 
> > > > > >is 
> > > > > >now created a current i the intensity of which will change according 
> > > > > >to 
> > > > > >the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when 
> > > > > >the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will 
> > > > > >again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the 
> > > > > >explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical 
> > > > > >contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and 
> > > > > >goes 
> > > > > >again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the 
> > > > > >most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb." 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can 
> > > > > >solve their ..."detonation" problem. 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
> > > > > the unchallengeable. 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> > > > the unchallengeable. 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> > > the unchallengeable. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> > the unchallengeable. 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.


Einstein, the king of liars and cheaters:

- I was not aware of the MMX in 1905.
- I was not aware of the works of Lorentz and Poincaré in 1905.
- I was not aware of the work of Lenard in 1905.
- I was not aware of the work of Hasenhorl in 1905.
- I was not aware of the work of Voigt in 1905.
- I was not aware of the work of Abraham, JJ Thomson, Larmor, Heavisde, FitzGerald, etc., in 1905.
- I was not aware of the work of Schwarzschild in 1907.
- I was not aware of the work of Minkowski in 1908. It took me by surprise.
- Michel Besso was only a sounding board and he never made a contribution to my work (1905-1917).
- I was not aware of the work of Hilbert in 1915. I wrote HFE by my own.
-  I was not aware of the work of Von Soldner in 1911. 
-  I was not aware of the work of Gerber (1910 - 1920).
- Germany was bad with me, even when they gave me $220,000 a year from 1914 to 1926 (current value of anual contract).
- Mileva wasn't involved in the least with my works between 1901 and 1907.
- I didn't knew Eddington by 1915. Lorentz did, and he was the hub between us (1916-1920). But it's not my fault.
- I never cheated my wife with my cousin in first degree, and even less with her daughter, even when she was my secretary (1918).
- I gave the full prize money to Mileva, as I promised. It's a lie that I kept 50%.
- I did help and taught young scientists, in the same way Bohr did. I even gave much more from me to others. That's why I had heirs.
- I didn't renounce to my german citizenship in 1894 to avoid compulsory conscription reaching 16 yo. As a proof, I obtained it back
  in 1914, just before WWI. I was 34 by then, and Schwarzschild volunteered being 41. His problem, not mine. Didn't work for him.
- I never stole Szilard's money, when I sold our patents to Electrolux. Good money, by the way, being 1931.
- I never beg to Wilhem Wien to publish me and give me some jobs in 1905-1906, nor he forced Drude to publish them. If Drude
  commit suicide that year, it was not a concern to me.


  Einstein’s Patents and Inventions 
  https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1709/1709.00666.pdf

- Etc., etc,.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#577191 — Cretinous kapo Richard Hertz comes to grips with his imbecility

On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 12:30:45 AM UTC-8, cretinous kapo Richard Hertz wrote:
>I am a cretinous kapo<

Yep

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web