Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #848556

Re: Einstein Lied Again

Message-ID <6233CE5A.BB8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2022-03-17 17:12 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject Re: Einstein Lied Again
References (6 earlier) <53qlugdgeickq4rfnfr0k2rpcehuej058p@4ax.com> <56l53hhc2ugq5p5pturjkt7lqa99sfd21q@4ax.com> <62339119.2432@ix.netcom.com> <0XMYJ.208016$aT3.89211@fx09.iad> <6233B71B.5A6F@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


So, here's the deal..

Xi takes Putin and Biden
 and puts them on the table
 and work out a real deal.


Then Xi tells Biden and Putin..

"I'm making the peace between the two of yous. If
both of yous don't agree on these terms, then
I DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF YOUS BLOWS YOURSELVES UP!
I'll just come in afterwards and take whatever is left.
I'LL THEN RULE THE FUCKIN WORLD!"


The Starmaker





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Biden has only been President for one year, with 3 more years left to go...
> 
> in 3 years Putin can take over Half The Planet!
> 
> Who is going to stop him????
> 
> It takes BRUTE FORCE to stop him.
> 
> The earth is up for grabs.
> 
> Opportunity only comes once in a while like this...
> 
> smash and grab.
> 
> Now, the only way to stop a World War 3 and to end this once and for all...NOW, is...
> 
> for the president of China Xi to interverne and say, "Okay, that's enough yous two!"
> 
> Xi takes Putin and Biden
> and puts them on the table
> and work out a real deal.
> 
> Because the Truth is, Xi thinks he owns the planet.
> 
> And he sees Putin and Biden like little kids on the block.
> 
> Of course I don't trust that fuckin chink.
> 
> he's gonna want something in returm...give him
> all the laundrymats.
> 
> no tickie, no shirty.
> 
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >
> > On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
> > > that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
> > >
> > >
> > > but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
> > >
> > > Einstein Lied Again!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
> > inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).
> >
> > The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
> > and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
> > >> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
> > >> problem you have today.
> > >>
> > >> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
> > >> hands...
> > >>
> > >> He wrote:
> > >> On January 23, 1950
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution "
> > >>
> > >> and then again he wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  "My only contribution"
> > >>
> > >> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
> > >>
> > >> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
> > >>
> > >>  Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
> > >> ..."
> > >>
> > >> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
> > >> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>
> > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
> > >> between 1905 and 1939.
> > >>
> > >> Like for example: between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> he was a teacher
> > >> teaching students
> > >> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
> > >>
> > >> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
> > >> (teachers pet)
> > >>
> > >> Another example:
> > >>  between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
> > >> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
> > >>>
> > >>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
> > >>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
> > >>>
> > >>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
> > >>> hands) in the same letter:
> > >>>
> > >>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
> > >>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
> > >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>>
> > >>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
> > >>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
> > >>> to my thoughts."
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
> > >>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
> > >>>
> > >>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
> > >>> it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here below is the whole letter:
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------
> > >>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
> > >>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
> > >>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
> > >>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
> > >>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
> > >>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
> > >>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
> > >>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
> > >>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
> > >>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
> > >>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
> > >>> working on such a project.
> > >>>
> > >>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
> > >>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
> > >>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
> > >>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> > >>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
> > >>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
> > >>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
> > >>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
> > >>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
> > >>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
> > >>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
> > >>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
> > >>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
> > >>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
> > >>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
> > >>> in deceiving, intimidating and
> > >>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
> > >>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
> > >>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
> > >>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
> > >>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
> > >>>
> > >>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
> > >>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
> > >>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
> > >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> .
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > >>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > >>>>
>        https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20januar
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > >>>> in the 1940's
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > >>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > >>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > >>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > -That's Karma-
> >
> > *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
> > *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
> > censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
> > prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
> > find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
> > you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
> > Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
> > a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
> > https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
> >
> > *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
> > 202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
> > but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
> > enough to finish it.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-16 23:50 -0700
  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 12:50 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2022-03-17 16:34 -0400
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 15:32 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 17:12 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-19 12:52 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-22 13:40 -0700

csiph-web