Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #576721

Re: Einstein Lied Again

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Here is a photo of Albert Einstein working with Lt. Stephen Brunauer who was in charge
of the "High Explosives Division".  

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666/photo/1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLQTpWXUYAMP8cm?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


Albert Einstein never had any problem getting 'security clearances' ...


But, if they ask me to kill Japs and Krauts, I would ask for more than $25.00 a day.




"it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
to explosion a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose." --Albert Einstein in a letter to Lt. Stephen Brunauer






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Oh, i forgot to mention that Albert Einstein
> got paid $25.00 a day to help the military
> with their denotation missile explosion problem..
> 
> He worked for the "High Explosive Division" at
> the military...
> Why do you suppose the military thought Albert
> Einstein could help them in that department?
> 
> Does Albert Einstein have and experience in the past
> having to do with missile explosions or ant
> High Explosives...some sort of bomb maybe?
> 
> But, BIG! HIGH!! EXPLOSIVE!!!
> 
> wat comes to mind?
> 
> "extremely powerful bombs of a new type"????
> 
> "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> 
> and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely
> powerful
>  bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory.
> However,
> 
> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> 
> air." --Albert Einstein
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:52:28 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> >>part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> >>
>   https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20january%2023&f=fal
> >>
> >>
> >>But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> >>in the 1940's
> >>
> >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> >>
> >>
> >>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> >>
> >>
> >> Einstein Lied Again
> >>
> >>
> >>I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> >>everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> >>
> >>So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> >>detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> >>
> >>But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> >>Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> >
> >Well, for years the Military had a hard time blowing up a Japanese
> >ship! Their missiles simply didn't work.
> >
> >For a couple of years they couldn't even hit a Japanese ship!
> >
> >They needed help. Where could they find a bomb expert????
> >
> >Now, ...shoot back a few years in history then and the
> >other Military had a problem...
> >
> >"2.17. Of course, the proof that a chain reaction is possible does not
> >itself insure that nuclear energy can be effective in a bomb. To have
> >an effective explosion it is necessary that the chain reaction build
> >up extremely rapidly; otherwise only a small amount of the nuclear
> >energy will be utilized before the bomb flies apart and the reaction
> >stops. It is also necessary that no premature explosion occur. This
> >entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the most
> >difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> >
> >
> >Albert Einstein wrote:
> >
> >"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
> >you were visiting me
> >it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
> >to explosion
> >a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> >I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> >would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> >S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
> >vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> >serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
> >S.
> >The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
> >by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
> >when
> >the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> >influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> >vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> >enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> >When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
> >the
> >nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> >magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
> >is
> >now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
> >to
> >the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> >the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> >again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> >explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> >contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
> >goes
> >again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"This entire "detonation" problem was and still remains one of the
> >most difficult problems in designing a high-efficiency atomic bomb."
> >
> >
> >I guess word of mouth got around that Albert Einstein can
> >solve their ..."detonation" problem.
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-17 23:39 -0800
  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-21 14:30 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 17:06 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-16 23:50 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 12:50 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2022-03-17 16:34 -0400
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 15:32 -0700
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 17:12 -0700
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-19 12:52 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-22 13:40 -0700
  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-01 11:52 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-09 22:30 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 10:45 -0800
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 21:22 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 13:42 -0800
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 15:07 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 00:30 -0800
                Cretinous kapo Richard Hertz comes to grips with his imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 06:57 -0800

csiph-web