Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #848685

Re: Einstein Lied Again

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In just one month, Putin did a Smash & Grab of Ukraine.

With Biden as President...Putin can Smash & Grab all of Europe
in less than 3 years!

Who exist today in power with BRUTE FORCE that can stop Putin now? Any names??

I don't see anybody...do you?



I don't know why Ukranians are running to Poland...Poland is NEXT!


Who exist today in power with BRUTE FORCE that can stop Putin now?


How about next week?

How about next month??

How about 2023? time flies when you're having fun...



[WHISPER} i'm sure behind the scenes they are talking about getting rid of Biden but
they don't know what to do with Kamala. maybe hit two birds with one stone.
i'm sure hillary clinton is working on it right now. (she wants to be the first woman president of the united states, but
she cannot do that with kamala still around.)  




  


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Biden has only been President for one year, with 3 more years left to go...
> 
> in 3 years Putin can take over Half The Planet!
> 
> Who is going to stop him????
> 
> It takes BRUTE FORCE to stop him.
> 
> The earth is up for grabs.
> 
> Opportunity only comes once in a while like this...
> 
> smash and grab.
> 
> Now, the only way to stop a World War 3 and to end this once and for all...NOW, is...
> 
> for the president of China Xi to interverne and say, "Okay, that's enough yous two!"
> 
> Xi takes Putin and Biden
> and puts them on the table
> and work out a real deal.
> 
> Because the Truth is, Xi thinks he owns the planet.
> 
> And he sees Putin and Biden like little kids on the block.
> 
> Of course I don't trust that fuckin chink.
> 
> he's gonna want something in returm...give him
> all the laundrymats.
> 
> no tickie, no shirty.
> 
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >
> > On 3/17/22 3:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Albert Einstein was sooo desperate to get rid of the blood on his hands..
> > > that he pointed the finger at Isaac Newton and gravity!
> > >
> > >
> > > but, but...there is no mention of Gravity in his 1905 paper.
> > >
> > > Einstein Lied Again!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Atomic bomb has and always been an 'offensive' weapon.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Actually it's the one weapon the losing side would use to change the
> > inevitable outcome (it's an act of desperation).
> >
> > The user is saying that the only thing worse than destroying the planet
> > and our own death is to surrender and be forced into slavery by our enemy.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Albert Einstein was called out because everybody
> > >> was saying he was the one "that started it all"...the atomic bomb
> > >> problem you have today.
> > >>
> > >> Below in this thread he Lied again to cover up the blood on his
> > >> hands...
> > >>
> > >> He wrote:
> > >> On January 23, 1950
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution "
> > >>
> > >> and then again he wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  "My only contribution"
> > >>
> > >> "Sole" and "only" mean the same thing by definition: one.
> > >>
> > >> But he is writing about two contributions in the same breath!
> > >>
> > >>  Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939,
> > >> ..."
> > >>
> > >> E=M c2 (the relationship between mass and energy)
> > >> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>
> > >> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>
> > >> ***Now, I need to come up with a Timeline of the Atomic Bomb
> > >> between 1905 and 1939.
> > >>
> > >> Like for example: between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> he was a teacher
> > >> teaching students
> > >> How To Build An Atomic Bomb.
> > >>
> > >> (Leo Zsilard was one of his students in the class Einstein)
> > >> (teachers pet)
> > >>
> > >> Another example:
> > >>  between
> > >>  1905 and 1939
> > >> Albert Einstein try to get inside Madame Curie's panties, and her
> > >> daughters just so he can get his hands on some... Uranium.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:30:37 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Albert Einstein is always trying to wipe the BLOOD off his hands...
> > >>>
> > >>> (it's a pattern with all scientist..they build bombs and germs that
> > >>> kill, and then they say...No, no, no...i had nothing to do with it!!!)
> > >>>
> > >>> So, Albert Einstein goes on with (trying to wipe the BLOOD off his
> > >>> hands) in the same letter:
> > >>>
> > >>> " My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I established
> > >>> the relationship between mass and energy,..."  (E=M  c^2)
> > >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >>>
> > >>> "...a truth about the physical world of a very general nature, whose
> > >>> possible connection with the military potential was completely foreign
> > >>> to my thoughts."
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Yeah, in 1905 he wasn't thinking.."Hey, I can KILL all those fucking
> > >>> Germans wit dis!!!!"
> > >>>
> > >>> Come on, give me a break,,they call it finding a new application for
> > >>> it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here below is the whole letter:
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------
> > >>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein replied:1m I sense the sincerity and
> > >>> seriousness of your intentions and well understand that you are making
> > >>> certain suggestions to me in the light of your own views concerning
> > >>> the development of atomic weapons and the present situation in the
> > >>> world. You proceed, however, from false assumptions.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have never taken part in work of a military-technical nature and
> > >>> have never done research having any bearing upon the production of the
> > >>> atomic bomb. My sole contribution in this field was that, in 1905, I
> > >>> established the relationship between mass and energy, a truth about
> > >>> the physical world of a very general nature, whose possible connection
> > >>> with the military potential was completely foreign to my thoughts. My
> > >>> only contribution with respect to the atomic bomb was that, in 1939, I
> > >>> signed a letter to President Roosevelt in which I called attention to
> > >>> the existing possibility of producing such a bomb and to the danger
> > >>> that the Germans might make use of that possibility. I considered this
> > >>> my duty because there were definite indications that the Germans were
> > >>> working on such a project.
> > >>>
> > >>> It would, therefore, be quite ridiculous if I were to issue a
> > >>> statement declaring my refusal to participate in armament work. Since
> > >>> the military authorities are well aware of my position, it would never
> > >>> occur to them to invite me to participate in such work.
> > >>> Concerning the political situation, I do not believe your
> > >>> I do not believe your proposal that the United States refrain from
> > >>> experimenting with the production of hydrogen bombs touches the core
> > >>> of the problem. The fact of the matter is that the people who possess
> > >>> the real power in this country have no intention of ending the cold
> > >>> war. The ruling group in this country has as little sought to avoid a
> > >>> conflict with the Soviet Union as the Russian ruling group has tried
> > >>> to avert such a conflict with the United States. Both groups are
> > >>> exploiting that conflict for their own internal political purposes, in
> > >>> complete disregard of the possible consequences. This development
> > >>> began immediately after Roosevelt's death. The men in power succeeded
> > >>> in deceiving, intimidating and
> > >>> fanaticizing the public. I do not see how that tiny group of people,
> > >>> who do know about all these circumstances, could possibly stop the
> > >>> disastrous course of events, especially in view of the fact that even
> > >>> the so-called "neutral" nations do not unite to co-operate for the
> > >>> protection of peace on a supranational basis.
> > >>>
> > >>> I myself have never hesitated to express my opinions freely; I have
> > >>> considered it my duty to do so. However, the voice of an individual is
> > >>> powerless against the shouting of the masses—this has always been so.
> > >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> .
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:39:19 -0800, The Starmaker
> > >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter..   I have never taken
> > >>>> part in work of a military-technical nature and have never done ...
> > >>>>
>        https://books.google.com/books?id=MxokDwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT755&dq=%22einstein+on+peace%22+%2B%22military-technical%22+january+23&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22einstein%20on%20peace%22%20%2B%22military-technical%22%20januar
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But here he is writing of military-technical nature bombs ideas
> > >>>> in the 1940's
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Einstein Lied Again
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I understand he doesn't want anybody to know...but it seems
> > >>>> everybody doesn't want everybody to know.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So Albert Einstein was busy in the 1940's designing bomb ideas to
> > >>>> detonate and destroy ships for the military...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But, but, where did the military get the idea all of a sudden that
> > >>>> Albert Einstein was a Detonation Bomb Expert????
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > -That's Karma-
> >
> > *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
> > *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
> > censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
> > prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
> > find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
> > you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
> > Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
> > a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
> > https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
> >
> > *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
> > 202 - As I said... before we went to the Middle East, don't go to war,
> > but if'n you're stupid enough to start a war then at least be smart
> > enough to finish it.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-16 23:50 -0700
  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 12:50 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> - 2022-03-17 16:34 -0400
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 15:32 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-17 17:12 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-19 12:52 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-22 13:40 -0700

csiph-web