Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663783

Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date	2025-05-30 20:36 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<683A7925.115F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <68361DFD.1876@ix.netcom.com> <6838835D.4BDF@ix.netcom.com> <683883C1.6784@ix.netcom.com> <683886CB.438@ix.netcom.com> <6838A3A6.54E5@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
> > > > > > experimentally disproven.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The question regarding photons is still disputed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Light is a wave and not a particle.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no "duality" of a wave and a particle, but it is a particle
> > > > > wave.
> > > >
> > > > Yous guys are too close to the ocean to sea the particle.
> > > >
> > > > If you ask a fish
> > > > does the ocean waves
> > > > affect your in any way?
> > > >
> > > > The fish wil be puzzled.
> > > >
> > > > He'll say, "What ocean waves?, those are particles!"
> > > >
> > > > You say to the fish "Don't you feel wet?"
> > > >
> > > > He'll say "What's wet?"
> > >
> > > When I go to the beach and jump into the ocean...
> > >
> > > I can feel all those particles.
> >
> > A fish doesn't breathe ocean waves...
> >
> > a fish breathes ...particles.
> >
> > A person doesn't breathe air waves..
> >
> > a person breathes ...particles, air particles.
> >
> > Is the fish wet?
> >
> > The fish
> > swims
> > in the
> > same ocean
> > as you do.
> >
> > Remove the gravity..
> > and you are swiming
> >  like a fish.
> >
> > Are you wet?
> >
> > What's wet?
> 
> okay, i knows yous guys don't understand Real World Physics...
> (especially since yous graduated from Google High or wiki university)
> 
> The ocean
> is Blue.
> 
> Now, I'm not
> talking about
> that thing
> you call
> the wet
> ocean blue...
> (where all the fishes live)
> 
> i'm talking about
> the sky ocean blue.
> 
> The sky is Blue.
> 
> It begins
> way up there..
> and it ends way down there.
> 
> Now, down there
> would be where you are
> standing on...
> and way up there
> would be around
> 70 miles.
> 
> So, the sky ocean blue.
> 
> (the sky is an ocean)
> (and it is blue)
> 
> means..
> 
> you are living
> at the bottom
> of the ocean.



In other words, dat which you call 'atmosphere' is in fact...


an ocean of air

and you live 
at the bottom
of the ocean.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 03:27 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-27 11:37 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 15:49 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-27 09:46 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Leolin Baboshkin <aino@ki.ru> - 2025-05-27 17:04 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-29 21:31 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:40 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-30 19:31 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 19:24 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-30 22:04 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-31 06:44 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-05-31 14:33 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-31 20:01 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-31 21:01 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 12:02 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 12:25 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-01 13:43 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 12:38 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 12:34 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 14:23 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 14:37 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-01 21:22 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 21:51 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 23:47 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Jhon Dobrenkov <krj@oknnr.ru> - 2025-06-04 22:40 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-16 21:42 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-17 14:21 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-17 20:20 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 17:58 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-02 19:36 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-03 08:50 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-03 09:40 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-04 07:42 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-02 20:38 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-03 08:56 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 14:30 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-03 14:56 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-03 19:34 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-03 19:44 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 21:22 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:58 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:41 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-04 14:50 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Elick Tulaev <atec@ltvluaav.ru> - 2025-06-04 22:59 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-05 11:36 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-05 13:53 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Emory Batsanov <veb@norerooa.ru> - 2025-06-05 21:36 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-08 11:01 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Darin Patrianakos <nr@irnirit.gr> - 2025-06-08 21:34 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:33 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-04 14:50 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 14:58 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-06-04 13:11 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 15:41 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Raikhlin Balabanov <ahrna@lihrn.ru> - 2025-06-04 15:58 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-07 08:52 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Osmani Babakhanov <ol@npsa.ru> - 2025-06-07 10:16 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-04 07:49 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-03 14:17 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-03 14:53 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Bobauk Bakharev <bb@kaak.ru> - 2025-06-03 13:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:21 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 14:04 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Baldemar Pokhojaev <evlr@hmao.ru> - 2025-05-31 21:09 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 21:03 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 22:08 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-30 21:42 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 20:45 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 21:12 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 22:56 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 22:57 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-27 13:23 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 21:11 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 08:27 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:25 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 17:16 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 00:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 21:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 21:03 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-28 07:59 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 18:56 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-30 12:06 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Felierix Babaev <ebe@elfal.ru> - 2025-05-30 12:17 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 19:08 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-31 09:09 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 20:50 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-01 09:22 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Jerrold Kalistratov <avsld@oro.ru> - 2025-06-01 16:47 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 23:45 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Kennon Babashov <naben@nsan.ru> - 2025-05-29 07:05 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 08:55 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 08:56 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 09:09 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 11:12 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. x <x@x.org> - 2025-05-29 16:30 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-30 20:36 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-27 22:08 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 22:30 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 12:36 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 19:04 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 20:59 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 21:28 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 21:40 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 23:49 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 00:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 03:35 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 03:41 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 08:14 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 13:10 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:20 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 23:14 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 23:33 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 13:52 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:14 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-03 06:12 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-28 12:04 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 19:02 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-29 13:36 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:18 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-30 13:05 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 19:11 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-31 13:29 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Walmo Belorussov <oolvw@rvvasv.ru> - 2025-05-31 14:19 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 20:52 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-06-03 11:14 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 08:30 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Hollis Molotkov <msmmvm@hlo.ru> - 2025-05-29 18:20 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:28 +0000

csiph-web