Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 20:36:05 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 125
Message-ID: <683A7925.115F@ix.netcom.com>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <68361DFD.1876@ix.netcom.com> <6838835D.4BDF@ix.netcom.com> <683883C1.6784@ix.netcom.com> <683886CB.438@ix.netcom.com> <6838A3A6.54E5@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 05:35:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="239a6cf3804490682a024afd1860aa44"; logging-data="983780"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OuuRPex5GtcUFKg7QRk/5d2lbfLkjkBA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Aa/Shz6rK5fFmmonnMtXWle7pNw=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250530-8, 05/30/2025), Outbound message
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:663783 sci.physics:892945

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
> > > > > > experimentally disproven.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The question regarding photons is still disputed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Light is a wave and not a particle.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no "duality" of a wave and a particle, but it is a particle
> > > > > wave.
> > > >
> > > > Yous guys are too close to the ocean to sea the particle.
> > > >
> > > > If you ask a fish
> > > > does the ocean waves
> > > > affect your in any way?
> > > >
> > > > The fish wil be puzzled.
> > > >
> > > > He'll say, "What ocean waves?, those are particles!"
> > > >
> > > > You say to the fish "Don't you feel wet?"
> > > >
> > > > He'll say "What's wet?"
> > >
> > > When I go to the beach and jump into the ocean...
> > >
> > > I can feel all those particles.
> >
> > A fish doesn't breathe ocean waves...
> >
> > a fish breathes ...particles.
> >
> > A person doesn't breathe air waves..
> >
> > a person breathes ...particles, air particles.
> >
> > Is the fish wet?
> >
> > The fish
> > swims
> > in the
> > same ocean
> > as you do.
> >
> > Remove the gravity..
> > and you are swiming
> >  like a fish.
> >
> > Are you wet?
> >
> > What's wet?
> 
> okay, i knows yous guys don't understand Real World Physics...
> (especially since yous graduated from Google High or wiki university)
> 
> The ocean
> is Blue.
> 
> Now, I'm not
> talking about
> that thing
> you call
> the wet
> ocean blue...
> (where all the fishes live)
> 
> i'm talking about
> the sky ocean blue.
> 
> The sky is Blue.
> 
> It begins
> way up there..
> and it ends way down there.
> 
> Now, down there
> would be where you are
> standing on...
> and way up there
> would be around
> 70 miles.
> 
> So, the sky ocean blue.
> 
> (the sky is an ocean)
> (and it is blue)
> 
> means..
> 
> you are living
> at the bottom
> of the ocean.



In other words, dat which you call 'atmosphere' is in fact...


an ocean of air

and you live 
at the bottom
of the ocean.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.