Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663747

Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date	2025-05-29 11:12 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<6838A3A6.54E5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <68361DFD.1876@ix.netcom.com> <6838835D.4BDF@ix.netcom.com> <683883C1.6784@ix.netcom.com> <683886CB.438@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
> > > > > experimentally disproven.
> > > > >
> > > > > The question regarding photons is still disputed.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
> > > > >
> > > > > Light is a wave and not a particle.
> > > >
> > > > There is no "duality" of a wave and a particle, but it is a particle
> > > > wave.
> > >
> > > Yous guys are too close to the ocean to sea the particle.
> > >
> > > If you ask a fish
> > > does the ocean waves
> > > affect your in any way?
> > >
> > > The fish wil be puzzled.
> > >
> > > He'll say, "What ocean waves?, those are particles!"
> > >
> > > You say to the fish "Don't you feel wet?"
> > >
> > > He'll say "What's wet?"
> >
> > When I go to the beach and jump into the ocean...
> >
> > I can feel all those particles.
> 
> A fish doesn't breathe ocean waves...
> 
> a fish breathes ...particles.
> 
> A person doesn't breathe air waves..
> 
> a person breathes ...particles, air particles.
> 
> Is the fish wet?
> 
> The fish
> swims
> in the
> same ocean
> as you do.
> 
> Remove the gravity..
> and you are swiming
>  like a fish.
> 
> Are you wet?
> 
> What's wet?

okay, i knows yous guys don't understand Real World Physics...
(especially since yous graduated from Google High or wiki university)

The ocean
is Blue.

Now, I'm not
talking about
that thing
you call
the wet
ocean blue...
(where all the fishes live)

i'm talking about
the sky ocean blue.


The sky is Blue.

It begins
way up there..
and it ends way down there.

Now, down there
would be where you are
standing on...
and way up there
would be around
70 miles.


So, the sky ocean blue.

(the sky is an ocean)
(and it is blue)

means..

you are living
at the bottom
of the ocean.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 03:27 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-27 11:37 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 15:49 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-27 09:46 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Leolin Baboshkin <aino@ki.ru> - 2025-05-27 17:04 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-29 21:31 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:40 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-30 19:31 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 19:24 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-30 22:04 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-31 06:44 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-05-31 14:33 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-31 20:01 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-31 21:01 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 12:02 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 12:25 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-01 13:43 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 12:38 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 12:34 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 14:23 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 14:37 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-01 21:22 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 21:51 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 23:47 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Jhon Dobrenkov <krj@oknnr.ru> - 2025-06-04 22:40 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-16 21:42 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-17 14:21 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-17 20:20 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 17:58 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-02 19:36 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-03 08:50 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-03 09:40 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-04 07:42 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-02 20:38 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-03 08:56 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 14:30 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-03 14:56 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-03 19:34 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-03 19:44 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 21:22 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:58 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:41 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-04 14:50 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Elick Tulaev <atec@ltvluaav.ru> - 2025-06-04 22:59 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-05 11:36 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-05 13:53 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Emory Batsanov <veb@norerooa.ru> - 2025-06-05 21:36 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-08 11:01 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Darin Patrianakos <nr@irnirit.gr> - 2025-06-08 21:34 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:33 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-04 14:50 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 14:58 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-06-04 13:11 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 15:41 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Raikhlin Balabanov <ahrna@lihrn.ru> - 2025-06-04 15:58 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-07 08:52 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Osmani Babakhanov <ol@npsa.ru> - 2025-06-07 10:16 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-04 07:49 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-03 14:17 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-03 14:53 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Bobauk Bakharev <bb@kaak.ru> - 2025-06-03 13:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:21 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 14:04 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Baldemar Pokhojaev <evlr@hmao.ru> - 2025-05-31 21:09 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 21:03 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 22:08 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-05-30 21:42 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 20:45 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 21:12 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 22:56 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 22:57 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-27 13:23 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 21:11 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 08:27 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:25 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 17:16 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 00:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 21:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 21:03 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-28 07:59 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 18:56 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-30 12:06 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Felierix Babaev <ebe@elfal.ru> - 2025-05-30 12:17 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 19:08 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-31 09:09 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 20:50 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-01 09:22 +0200
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Jerrold Kalistratov <avsld@oro.ru> - 2025-06-01 16:47 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 23:45 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Kennon Babashov <naben@nsan.ru> - 2025-05-29 07:05 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 08:55 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 08:56 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 09:09 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-29 11:12 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. x <x@x.org> - 2025-05-29 16:30 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-30 20:36 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-27 22:08 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-27 22:30 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 12:36 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 19:04 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 20:59 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 21:28 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-28 21:40 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 23:49 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 00:54 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 03:35 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 03:41 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 08:14 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 13:10 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:20 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-29 23:14 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 23:33 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 13:52 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:14 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-03 06:12 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-28 12:04 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-28 19:02 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-29 13:36 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:18 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-30 13:05 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-30 19:11 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-31 13:29 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Walmo Belorussov <oolvw@rvvasv.ru> - 2025-05-31 14:19 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-31 20:52 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-06-03 11:14 +0300
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 08:30 -0700
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. Hollis Molotkov <msmmvm@hlo.ru> - 2025-05-29 18:20 +0000
Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-05-29 21:28 +0000

csiph-web