Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #655401
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Energy? |
| Date | 2024-07-30 22:29 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <66A9CBC9.2213@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Energy-20240728103722@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <66A8307B.8B6@ix.netcom.com> <9U6dneBCi4_A_DX7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Ross Finlayson wrote: > > On 07/29/2024 05:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > There is no one person on earth that can even define correctly the > > word...Energy. > > > > > > > > Stefan Ram wrote: > >> > >> In a chapter of a book, the author gives this relation for a > >> system with mass m = 0: > >> > >> E^2/c^2 = p^"3-vector" * p^"3-vector" > >> > >> . Then he writes, "This implies that either there is no particle > >> at all, E = 0, or we have a particle, E <> 0, and therefore > >> p^'3-vector' <> 0.". > >> > >> So, his intention is to kind of prove that a particle without mass > >> must have momentum. > >> > >> But I wonder: Does "E = 0" really mean, "there is no particle."? > >> > >> 300 years ago, folks would have said, "m = 0" means that there is > >> no particle! Today, we know that there are particles with no mass. > >> > >> Can we be confident that "E = 0" means "no particle", or could there > >> be a particle with "E = 0"? > >> > >> Here's the Unicode: > >> > >> E²/c² = p⃗ · p⃗ > >> > >> and > >> > >> |This implies that either there is no particle at all, E = 0, or we > >> |have a particle, E ≠0, and therefore p⃗ ≠0. > > > > Entropy has two definitions, sort of opposite each other, > "Aristotle's and Leibniz'". > > The energy or energeia then relates to the entelechiae, > content and connectedness, what results to dynamis/dunamis, > which are the same word, one for power the other potential. > > So, energy is defined by other definitions, the least. What is Einstein's definition of...Energy? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-29 17:14 -0700
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-29 20:43 -0700
Re: Energy? Eddy Vadász <azsd@ddd.hu> - 2024-07-30 16:46 +0000
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-30 22:29 -0700
Re: Energy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-31 10:02 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 10:30 +0200
Re: Energy? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-31 15:30 +0000
Re: Energy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-31 21:02 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 22:37 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 22:43 +0200
Re: Energy? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-01 03:12 +0000
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 07:15 +0200
Re: Energy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-08-02 10:05 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 11:05 +0200
Re: Energy? Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-02 13:32 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 15:22 +0200
Re: Energy? Bobauk Guang Chou <gbnbu@agag.cn> - 2024-08-02 09:48 +0000
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 13:46 +0200
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-31 12:43 -0700
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-01 10:45 -0700
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-01 12:32 -0700
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-01 17:03 -0700
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-02 08:52 -0700
Re: Energy? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-08-03 12:43 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-03 16:30 +0200
Re: Energy? Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-03 16:38 +0200
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-03 17:37 +0200
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-03 18:22 -0700
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-03 19:46 -0700
Re: Energy? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-04 11:22 +0200
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-04 08:03 -0700
Re: Energy? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-05 09:01 +0200
Re: Energy? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-04 18:03 +0000
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-04 11:33 -0700
Re: Energy? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-04 19:38 +0000
Re: Energy? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-04 13:16 -0700
Re: Energy? Verdell Muklevich Fung <vvll@lhvvec.ru> - 2024-08-04 23:42 +0000
Re: Energy? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-04 22:13 +0200
Re: Energy? Rictor Tatár <trttr@cirrtrra.hu> - 2024-08-05 11:08 +0000
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-05 08:45 -0700
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-06 10:15 -0700
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-07 11:13 -0700
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-09 09:38 -0700
Re: Energy? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-10 10:37 +0200
Re: Energy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-10 09:59 -0700
csiph-web