Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #651816

Re: Einstein synchronisation

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Richard Hachel wrote:
> >
> > https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
> >
> > The problem with Einstein's synchronization is that it is defined in a
> > Galilean way.
> > Einstein presupposes in his frame of reference, a flat and absolute
> > present time, and therefore goes very quickly to definition, to move on to
> > the next paragraph.
> > What is he really saying new? Nothing.
> > The great thing is to say:
> > tA'-tA=2AB/c
> > I can also add, in the same sense, that a swallow is a swallow.
> > Then Einstein will commit the enormous relativistic error of immediately
> > and without paying attention to t(AB)=t(BA), a proposition which can only
> > be true for a neutral observer placed at an equal distance from A and B,
> > and having to take into account only identical anisochrony, and perfect
> > simultaneity of the two watches.
> > The equality that he posits is therefore completely false, intellectually
> > false, physically false, for the enormous majority of points in his space
> > that he will take as reference.
> >
> > His synchronization method, but he does not say it, is ONLY valid for a
> > given point P, and the simultaneity of various events occurring in the
> > frame of reference is ONLY valid for this point and not the integrity of
> > the frame of reference.
> >
> > He doesn't explain this.
> >
> > Or worse, he doesn't know it.
> >
> > R.H.
> 
> Nature forgot to synchronize.
> 
> Nature does not display any...clocks.


The shorest distance between two points is a straight line.

But Nature does not display any straight lines.


Otherwise, ...ants would travel in staight lines...but they don't.


Only Platonists see straight lines. 

(just another cult)





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-26 17:23 +0000
  Re: Einstein synchronisation "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-26 20:17 +0100
    Re: Einstein synchronisation Rózsa Erdős Kálmán <nemor@rnedds.hu> - 2024-02-26 21:16 +0000
      Re: Einstein synchronisation trolidous <trolidous@go.com> - 2024-02-26 17:39 -0800
    Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 13:49 -0800
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 00:29 +0000
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-27 01:46 +0100
          Re: Einstein synchronisation "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-27 11:42 +0100
            Re: Einstein synchronisation Vernon Romão Simões <rrvvo@om.pt> - 2024-02-27 21:45 +0000
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:02 +0000
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-27 12:02 +0200
          Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 10:56 +0000
          Re: Einstein synchronisation Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-02-27 12:16 +0100
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:11 +0000
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 21:56 -0800
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:23 +0000
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:41 +0000
  Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-26 21:12 -0800
    Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-26 22:01 -0800
    Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 22:14 -0800
      Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-29 09:07 -0800
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 10:37 -0800
          Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-02 12:33 -0800
            Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-05 10:23 -0800
              Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:26 -0800
    Re: Einstein synchronisation trolidous <trolidous@go.com> - 2024-02-27 08:35 -0800
  Re: Einstein synchronisation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-27 11:58 +0200
    Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 10:47 +0000
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-27 09:11 -0500
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-02-27 16:27 +0100
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 19:09 +0000
          Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-27 11:25 -0800
        Re: Einstein synchronisation Cecilio San Kwang <lcil@son.kr> - 2024-02-27 22:27 +0000
      Re: Einstein synchronisation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-29 12:40 +0200

csiph-web