Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #651814
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einstein synchronisation |
| Date | 2024-02-26 21:12 -0800 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <65DD6F4F.1644@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <S_mOZSVVV5xbwe2044yjthG8mWg@jntp> |
Richard Hachel wrote: > > https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf > > The problem with Einstein's synchronization is that it is defined in a > Galilean way. > Einstein presupposes in his frame of reference, a flat and absolute > present time, and therefore goes very quickly to definition, to move on to > the next paragraph. > What is he really saying new? Nothing. > The great thing is to say: > tA'-tA=2AB/c > I can also add, in the same sense, that a swallow is a swallow. > Then Einstein will commit the enormous relativistic error of immediately > and without paying attention to t(AB)=t(BA), a proposition which can only > be true for a neutral observer placed at an equal distance from A and B, > and having to take into account only identical anisochrony, and perfect > simultaneity of the two watches. > The equality that he posits is therefore completely false, intellectually > false, physically false, for the enormous majority of points in his space > that he will take as reference. > > His synchronization method, but he does not say it, is ONLY valid for a > given point P, and the simultaneity of various events occurring in the > frame of reference is ONLY valid for this point and not the integrity of > the frame of reference. > > He doesn't explain this. > > Or worse, he doesn't know it. > > R.H. Nature forgot to synchronize. Nature does not display any...clocks. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-26 17:23 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-26 20:17 +0100
Re: Einstein synchronisation Rózsa Erdős Kálmán <nemor@rnedds.hu> - 2024-02-26 21:16 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation trolidous <trolidous@go.com> - 2024-02-26 17:39 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 13:49 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 00:29 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-27 01:46 +0100
Re: Einstein synchronisation "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-27 11:42 +0100
Re: Einstein synchronisation Vernon Romão Simões <rrvvo@om.pt> - 2024-02-27 21:45 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:02 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-27 12:02 +0200
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 10:56 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-02-27 12:16 +0100
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:11 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 21:56 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:23 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 01:41 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-26 21:12 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-26 22:01 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 22:14 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-29 09:07 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 10:37 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-02 12:33 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-05 10:23 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:26 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation trolidous <trolidous@go.com> - 2024-02-27 08:35 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-27 11:58 +0200
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 10:47 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-27 09:11 -0500
Re: Einstein synchronisation Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-02-27 16:27 +0100
Re: Einstein synchronisation Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-27 19:09 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-27 11:25 -0800
Re: Einstein synchronisation Cecilio San Kwang <lcil@son.kr> - 2024-02-27 22:27 +0000
Re: Einstein synchronisation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-29 12:40 +0200
csiph-web