Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #595589
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The best Rigger should win |
| Date | 2022-11-17 11:59 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <637692A9.4BFB@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (26 earlier) <02149595-5fec-4162-b46b-39671650ec83n@googlegroups.com> <6375B619.5F04@ix.netcom.com> <b97840f8-991f-4f49-9176-cbf48d8e3c44n@googlegroups.com> <637600EC.1F5A@ix.netcom.com> <tl60me$19m0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Michael Moroney wrote: > > On 11/17/2022 4:37 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Paul Alsing wrote: > >> > >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 8:18:20 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 3:47:37 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Since the Republicans now are the House Majority...does that mean they will make 'mail-in ballots' by election day illegal???? > >>>> > >>>> If you knew anything about the process you would already know that any law proposed by the House needs to also pass the Senate, so don't hold your breath... > >> > >>> Well, a majority vote by the Senate would equal 21, the Republicans I believe got more than 21 > >> > >> I see you know less about congress than you know about physics... and that is saying something! The Senate members number 100, so a majority would be 51, not 21... go back to sleep, nothing here for you to see here... > > > > > > I only go by high school > > > > Most bills require a majority vote (it must pass by 21 votes in the Senate and 41 votes in the Assembly), > > while urgency measures and appropriation bills require a two-thirds vote (27 in the Senate, 54 in the Assembly) > > > Assembly? WTF is that? The House of Representatives has 435 members, is > called the House, not the Assembly. 218 would be the majority. > > Are you thinking of some state? New York maybe, they call their "house" > the Assembly. Thinking??? I only go by high school Most bills require a majority vote (it must pass by 21 votes in the Senate and 41 votes in the Assembly), while urgency measures and appropriation bills require a two-thirds vote (27 in the Senate, 54 in the Assembly) Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/26273773 I don't know what an assembly is...I know they have assemblies in skools... but, did is wat it reads in https://brainly.com/question/26273773 Most bills require a majority vote (it must pass by 21 votes in the Senate and 41 votes in the Assembly), while urgency measures and appropriation bills require a two-thirds vote (27 in the Senate, 54 in the Assembly) Maybe I shouda ask AOC... she the brainy of washington dc -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-20 12:22 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 12:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:51 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-01 21:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 23:38 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-02 09:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:25 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 16:57 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 11:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 14:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:45 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 16:59 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 21:47 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-04 07:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:14 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 11:04 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 15:09 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 17:57 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 23:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 23:20 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 11:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:34 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 11:32 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 12:54 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 13:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 11:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 15:47 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 20:18 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 01:37 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 11:59 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-17 17:09 -0600
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 12:23 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 16:21 -0800
csiph-web