Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594575
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The best Rigger should win |
| Date | 2022-11-01 19:29 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6361D5F7.2B2F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <63508BD9.3E1D@ix.netcom.com> <63508E90.5F62@ix.netcom.com> <63508F82.3A8A@ix.netcom.com> <63519FE3.6DCF@ix.netcom.com> <v5s2mh51odfh6r3qsnb3r9etr419oge64a@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
At a very Bare-minimum level as it reads here: https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large In Counting there is Strength. You rig the votes by rigging the Count. "As long as I count the votes..." The day after the mid-term election..one side will claim the other side rigged the votes. May the best Rigger(cheater) win. The Starmaker wrote: > > I'm sure you heard by now the Brazil election just passed....(looks > like China now OWNS Brazil) > > “We want the truth about the voting machines,” he said. “We don’t > believe them, and we want the Army to take over and count the votes > correctly.” > > https://dnyuz.com/2022/11/01/bolsonaro-supporters-try-to-paralyze-brazil-as-they-wait-for-him-to-speak/ > > The Army count the votes??? One, two..I lost my place." > > Hey, forget about it! The best Rigger should win > > (i bet a million dollars they used voting machines...made in china.) > > In Counting there's is STRENGTH. > > Boss Tweed. "As long as I count the votes, what are you going to do > about it? Say?" / > https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/pnp/ds/12500/12564v.jpg > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large > > The same event will happen after the usa election. > > Oh, you also want a recount, no problem? One, two..I lost my place." > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-20 12:22 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 12:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:51 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-01 21:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 23:38 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-02 09:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:25 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 16:57 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 11:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 14:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:45 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 16:59 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 21:47 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-04 07:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:14 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 11:04 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 15:09 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 17:57 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 23:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 23:20 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 11:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:34 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 11:32 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 12:54 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 13:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 11:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 15:47 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 20:18 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 01:37 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 11:59 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-17 17:09 -0600
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 12:23 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 16:21 -0800
csiph-web