Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594600

Re: The best Rigger should win

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The best Rigger should win
Date	2022-11-02 11:08 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<6362B23B.1A79@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <63508F82.3A8A@ix.netcom.com> <63519FE3.6DCF@ix.netcom.com> <v5s2mh51odfh6r3qsnb3r9etr419oge64a@4ax.com> <6361D5F7.2B2F@ix.netcom.com> <6361DB34.1A57@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In today's News:



"...to refrain from claiming that anyone depositing multiple ballots is
behaving illegally."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11379171/Arizona-judge-orders-armed-election-monitors-stay-250-feet-drop-boxes.html


LETS STUFF THOSE FUCKING BALLOTS BOXES!!!! It's Legal !



How to Rig an Election, Legalize Rigging an Election!



In Brazil the loser is afraid to say it was rigged because it's illegal
to say it was rigged.


China KNOWS How To rig an election in Brazil.





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> In today's News...
> 
> Pennsylvania court says undated ballots won't be counted
> State Supreme Court orders election boards to preserve and 'refrain from counting' misdated or undated absentee ballots
> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pa-court-says-undated-ballots-wont-be-counted-rnc-scores-massive-win-in-election-integrity-lawsuit
> 
> WHAT???? They are meddleding with the primal forces of nature!!!!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> and I won’t have it. Is that clear?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > At a very Bare-minimum level
> >
> > as it reads here:
> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large
> >
> > In Counting there is Strength.
> >
> > You rig the votes by rigging the Count.
> >
> > "As long as I count the votes..."
> >
> > The day after the mid-term election..one side will
> > claim the other side rigged the votes.
> >
> > May the best Rigger(cheater) win.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sure you heard by now the Brazil election just passed....(looks
> > > like China now OWNS Brazil)
> > >
> > > “We want the truth about the voting machines,” he said. “We don’t
> > > believe them, and we want the Army to take over and count the votes
> > > correctly.”
> > >
> > > https://dnyuz.com/2022/11/01/bolsonaro-supporters-try-to-paralyze-brazil-as-they-wait-for-him-to-speak/
> > >
> > > The Army count the votes??? One, two..I lost my place."
> > >
> > > Hey, forget about it!  The best Rigger should win
> > >
> > > (i bet a million dollars they used voting machines...made in china.)
> > >
> > > In Counting there's is STRENGTH.
> > >
> > > Boss Tweed. "As long as I count the votes, what are you going to do
> > > about it? Say?" /
> > > https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/pnp/ds/12500/12564v.jpg
> > > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large
> > >
> > > The same event will happen after the usa election.
> > >
> > > Oh, you also want a recount, no problem? One, two..I lost my place."
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-20 12:22 -0700
  Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 12:29 -0700
    Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:29 -0700
      Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:51 -0700
        Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-01 21:53 -0700
          Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 23:38 -0700
            Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-02 09:08 -0700
              Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:25 -0700
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 16:57 -0700
        Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:08 -0700
        Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 11:53 -0700
          Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 14:12 -0700
            Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:45 -0700
        Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:12 -0700
          Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:26 -0700
            Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 16:59 -0700
              Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 21:47 -0700
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-04 07:26 -0700
            Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:14 -0800
              Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 11:04 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 15:09 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 17:57 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 23:30 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 23:20 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 11:30 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:05 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:34 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 11:32 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 12:54 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 13:05 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 11:07 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 15:47 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 20:18 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 01:37 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 11:59 -0800
                Re: The best Rigger should win whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-17 17:09 -0600
                Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 12:23 -0800
              Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 16:21 -0800

csiph-web