Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594585
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The best Rigger should win |
| Date | 2022-11-01 23:38 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6362105A.4029@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <63519FE3.6DCF@ix.netcom.com> <v5s2mh51odfh6r3qsnb3r9etr419oge64a@4ax.com> <6361D5F7.2B2F@ix.netcom.com> <6361DB34.1A57@ix.netcom.com> <ed36ac33-6bfd-4200-9d09-6186f3b96da6n@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 7:51:08 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > In today's News... > > > > Pennsylvania court says undated ballots won't be counted > > State Supreme Court orders election boards to preserve and 'refrain from counting' misdated or undated absentee ballots > > https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pa-court-says-undated-ballots-wont-be-counted-rnc-scores-massive-win-in-election-integrity-lawsuit > > What makes you, or anyone else for that matter, think that this would give an advantage to either party? It seems to me that the odds of someone forgetting to date their ballot would be equally probable for voters of any party. What exactly is the goal of such a thing? I suppose that more democrats vote by mail, but I am not at all sure why this would be the case. Undated ballots is a method of adding a million votes to a party before, during, and after an election while they are still being counted. You take the undated/misdated ballots you have hidden under the table and you 'count' those in. You win the election. In Counting there's is STRENGTH. You can also print your own ballots using your inkject printer at home by printing on Blank Offical Ballot Paper. May the best Rigger win. What date do dead people put on their mail in ballots? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-20 12:22 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 12:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:29 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 19:51 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-01 21:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-01 23:38 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-02 09:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:25 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 16:57 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-02 11:08 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 11:53 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 14:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:45 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:12 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 16:59 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 21:47 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-04 07:26 -0700
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:14 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 11:04 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 15:09 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 17:57 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 23:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-08 23:20 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 11:30 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:34 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 11:32 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 12:54 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-12 13:05 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 11:07 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 15:47 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 20:18 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 01:37 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 11:59 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-17 17:09 -0600
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-17 12:23 -0800
Re: The best Rigger should win The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-07 16:21 -0800
csiph-web