Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12613

Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1
Date Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:10:01 +0100
Message-ID <G9HtL-cK0M-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <G4EmR-9q77-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4F9f-9qCF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G9BeF-cFYW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 15 22:00:08 2023
Old-Return-Path <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-9.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AO0yUKWpRC98cdI2CyCXCtjFwHlsWYGaYwalTKFcTmNKTVoQIY3ePiwH Te7ivMcAibjm/PIIvU5SgBU3+GAbDah0/eLVmNqxsc+CNUm6mQdesDh0IbtXolr+fbv1FEsubdQ apfYat0/1HNo0BBNeA+qGPASujQi6HVxJpP72QzXw3YwX1OIYxbkaJg6zMQ==
X-Received by 2002:a5b:6c8:0:b0:b36:32f8:852d with SMTP id r8-20020a5b06c8000000b00b3632f8852dmr5352465ybq.4.1678917585639; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-SMTP-Source AK7set/rXyfyl7tIaSix7u3/pMWjvPQfhQX2FbTGmV0E3Ko8x0pAQf9zUxWmEUPDNEQXyWzWhDD4GXXh5RMLBszmjjc=
X-Received by 2002:a5b:6c8:0:b0:b36:32f8:852d with SMTP id r8-20020a5b06c8000000b00b3632f8852dmr5352455ybq.4.1678917585382; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23270
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALFf3kcfqNOF9=02z8+YAxw7+mjzSM8Pu=5XAjQUhietZLpfdw@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 75
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:59:34 +1300
X-Original-Message-ID <CALFf3kcfqNOF9=02z8+YAxw7+mjzSM8Pu=5XAjQUhietZLpfdw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CALFf3keKSn7dpr3bsLqxYDNY51CyPPGvY3arKXX+bTsVsOBiJg@mail.gmail.com> <c8ca74ac-6a4a-feee-315f-d27ff73b8666@tarent.de> <8650b221ef3d4d62101d8ca020b83271@apache.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12613

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi,

Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that
some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6.

For instance jtreg 6 fails:
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/DoubleNodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/FlagOpTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/IntNodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/LongNodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeBuilderTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SliceSpliteratorTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamFlagsTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamOpFlagsTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamReuseTest.java

and with jreg 5 those tests pass:
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/DoubleNodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/FlagOpTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/IntNodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/LongNodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeBuilderTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SliceSpliteratorTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamFlagsTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamOpFlagsTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamReuseTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful

There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can
provide a full comparison.

Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in
order to be able to perform regression tests in line with the upstream
testsuite?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

[1] https://openjdk.org/jtreg/faq.html#what-is-tiered-testing

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:22 AM Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Le 2023-03-02 01:30, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> > openjdk-8 was switched to jtreg6 recently. See if doko will
> > follow for 11.
>
> openjdk-11/11.0.18+10-1 in unstable now uses jtreg6
>
>
> > Is a new package needed anyway?
>
> I agree with Thorsten, a new package is probably not needed. All
> openjdk-*
> packages in unstable now use jtreg6. So I suggest upgrading the unused
> jtreg package to the version 7 instead of creating a new package.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 00:50 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 01:40 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 02:00 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 02:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-03 02:30 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-03 04:00 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 03:50 +0100
              Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 10:40 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 21:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 08:30 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 10:50 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 20:20 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 16:30 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-28 22:40 +0200
            jtreg 7 vs. jtreg6 vs. testng vs. openjdk-8 (was Re: OpenJDK package  - JTREG 7.1) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-29 21:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100

csiph-web