Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12613

Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

From Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1
Date 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
Message-ID <G9HtL-cK0M-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <G4EmR-9q77-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4F9f-9qCF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G9BeF-cFYW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that
some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6.

For instance jtreg 6 fails:
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/DoubleNodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/FlagOpTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/IntNodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/LongNodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeBuilderTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SliceSpliteratorTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamFlagsTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamOpFlagsTest.java
FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamReuseTest.java

and with jreg 5 those tests pass:
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/DoubleNodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/FlagOpTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/IntNodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/LongNodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeBuilderTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SliceSpliteratorTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamFlagsTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamOpFlagsTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful
java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamReuseTest.java
                         Passed. Execution successful

There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can
provide a full comparison.

Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in
order to be able to perform regression tests in line with the upstream
testsuite?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

[1] https://openjdk.org/jtreg/faq.html#what-is-tiered-testing

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:22 AM Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Le 2023-03-02 01:30, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> > openjdk-8 was switched to jtreg6 recently. See if doko will
> > follow for 11.
>
> openjdk-11/11.0.18+10-1 in unstable now uses jtreg6
>
>
> > Is a new package needed anyway?
>
> I agree with Thorsten, a new package is probably not needed. All
> openjdk-*
> packages in unstable now use jtreg6. So I suggest upgrading the unused
> jtreg package to the version 7 instead of creating a new package.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 00:50 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 01:40 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 02:00 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 02:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-03 02:30 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-03 04:00 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 03:50 +0100
              Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 10:40 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 21:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 08:30 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 10:50 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 20:20 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 16:30 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-28 22:40 +0200
            jtreg 7 vs. jtreg6 vs. testng vs. openjdk-8 (was Re: OpenJDK package  - JTREG 7.1) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-29 21:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100

csiph-web