Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Vladimir Petko Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Emmanuel Bourg X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 15 22:00:08 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWpRC98cdI2CyCXCtjFwHlsWYGaYwalTKFcTmNKTVoQIY3ePiwH Te7ivMcAibjm/PIIvU5SgBU3+GAbDah0/eLVmNqxsc+CNUm6mQdesDh0IbtXolr+fbv1FEsubdQ apfYat0/1HNo0BBNeA+qGPASujQi6HVxJpP72QzXw3YwX1OIYxbkaJg6zMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5b:6c8:0:b0:b36:32f8:852d with SMTP id r8-20020a5b06c8000000b00b3632f8852dmr5352465ybq.4.1678917585639; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:59:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-SMTP-Source: AK7set/rXyfyl7tIaSix7u3/pMWjvPQfhQX2FbTGmV0E3Ko8x0pAQf9zUxWmEUPDNEQXyWzWhDD4GXXh5RMLBszmjjc= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:6c8:0:b0:b36:32f8:852d with SMTP id r8-20020a5b06c8000000b00b3632f8852dmr5352455ybq.4.1678917585382; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:59:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23270 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALFf3kcfqNOF9=02z8+YAxw7+mjzSM8Pu=5XAjQUhietZLpfdw@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 75 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Thorsten Glaser , debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:59:34 +1300 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <8650b221ef3d4d62101d8ca020b83271@apache.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12613 Hi, Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6. For instance jtreg 6 fails: FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/DoubleNodeTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/FlagOpTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/IntNodeTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/LongNodeTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeBuilderTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SliceSpliteratorTest.jav= a FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamFlagsTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamOpFlagsTest.java FAILED: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamReuseTest.java and with jreg 5 those tests pass: java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/DoubleNodeTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/FlagOpTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/IntNodeTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/LongNodeTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeBuilderTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/NodeTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SliceSpliteratorTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamFlagsTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamOpFlagsTest.java Passed. Execution successful java/util/stream/boottest/java/util/stream/StreamReuseTest.java Passed. Execution successful There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can provide a full comparison. Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in order to be able to perform regression tests in line with the upstream testsuite? Best Regards, Vladimir. [1] https://openjdk.org/jtreg/faq.html#what-is-tiered-testing On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:22=E2=80=AFAM Emmanuel Bourg = wrote: > > Le 2023-03-02 01:30, Thorsten Glaser a =C3=A9crit : > > > openjdk-8 was switched to jtreg6 recently. See if doko will > > follow for 11. > > openjdk-11/11.0.18+10-1 in unstable now uses jtreg6 > > > > Is a new package needed anyway? > > I agree with Thorsten, a new package is probably not needed. All > openjdk-* > packages in unstable now use jtreg6. So I suggest upgrading the unused > jtreg package to the version 7 instead of creating a new package. > > Emmanuel Bourg >