Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12614

Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

From	Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1
Date	2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
Message-ID	<G9HDs-cK4P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<G4EmR-9q77-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4F9f-9qCF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G9BeF-cFYW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G9HtL-cK0M-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <G9HDs-cK4P-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

I see. I will look into those failures to see if it is something that
I can submit upstream, so that jtreg 5 could be phased out.

Thanks a lot for the help again !!!!!!!

Best Regards,
 Valdimir.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:11 AM Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>
> >Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that
> >some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6.
>
> Lots of tests fail there anyway, also due to lack of asmtools.
>
> >For instance jtreg 6 fails:
> […]
> >and with jreg 5 those tests pass:
> […]
> >There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can
> >provide a full comparison.
>
> Might be useful to pass that on to the 8u developers.
> I won’t be doing anything with it and the ELTS people
> are mostly interested in comparing test results against
> the previous upload’s, to see that nothing broke too badly.
> If upstream makes their tests jtreg6 compatible all the better.
>
> >Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in
>
> No, we’re targetting jessie and stretch with openjdk-8 mostly,
> which lacks jtreg 5 and where the backported jtreg6 really
> helps, without, we had to disable the tests entirely.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
> Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
> Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
> HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
>
>                         ****************************************************
> /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
> ╲ ╱ Campaign against      Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:
>  ╳  HTML eMail! Also,     https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
> ╱ ╲ header encryption!
>                         ****************************************************

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 00:50 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 01:40 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 02:00 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 02:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-03 02:30 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-03 04:00 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 03:50 +0100
              Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 10:40 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 21:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 08:30 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 10:50 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 20:20 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 16:30 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-28 22:40 +0200
            jtreg 7 vs. jtreg6 vs. testng vs. openjdk-8 (was Re: OpenJDK package  - JTREG 7.1) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-29 21:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100

csiph-web