Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12606
| From | Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 |
| Date | 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <G9i2l-ctR1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <G4FCh-9r27-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G52pb-9FJ0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G53Oh-9Gru-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G92TD-cki1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G99ip-coxw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, Thank you very much!!!!! Since I can not upload I will file the ITP then. Would it be ok to keep ownership with the Debian Java Team in line with jtreg6? Best Regards, Vladimir. On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:29 PM Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > >jtreg6 (in line with jtreg6 packaging which kept jtreg changelog). Was > >it a correct thing to do, or should it be truncated? > > You can keep it; debhelper can now truncate it. > > >I could not find an ITP bug for jtreg6, does it mean that there is > >some other process that I need to follow? > > ITPs are not necessary, only “nice” (e.g. to avoid duplicate work). > If you consider it uploadable, upload it ignoring the lack of ITP. > > bye, > //mirabilos > -- > Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH > Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ > Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 > HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 > Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg > > **************************************************** > /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon > ╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen: > ╳ HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter > ╱ ╲ header encryption! > ****************************************************
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 00:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 01:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 02:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 02:10 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-03 02:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-03 04:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 03:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 10:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 08:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 10:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 20:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 16:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-28 22:40 +0200
jtreg 7 vs. jtreg6 vs. testng vs. openjdk-8 (was Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-29 21:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
csiph-web