Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12071

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:22 PM Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/15/21 1:40 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM <raphael.jolly@free.fr <mailto:raphael.jolly@free.fr>> wrote:
> >     It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el.
> >     https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/
> >
> > Ah, thanks for the explanation! It helped me to appropriately adjust build-depends. Hmm, it looks
> > like Zero is not supported on MIPS at the moment, but perhaps that site is just out-of-date?
>
> There only Zero on mips64el for all current OpenJDKs. Zero for mips64el should be supported since
> JDK 10, see JDK-8186313: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186313
>
> ...so openjdk-11 is supposed to work.
>
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:56 PM Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com
> > <mailto:tiago.daitx@canonical.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     This seems to indicate that the isDirectory call [4] is getting wrong
> >     file attributes. Following the trail, those file attributes come from
> >     a fstatat call [5] which ultimately come from the native stack in
> >     UnixNativeDispatcher.c [6]. The actual way that fstatat is called
> >     depends on the build flags and defines from the arch, so somebody with
> >     better knowledge might want to take a look at UnixNativeDispatcher.c
> >     [6] and tell if OpenJDK is picking the right function to call for
> >     mips64el.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the excellent analysis! So is this indeed a bug in OpenJDK on mips64el then? I'm happy to
> > file the bug, referencing all of the information in this thread, if that's the probable culprit here.
>
> Thing is, there is hardly anyone who supports mips64el in OpenJDK upstream. I think Debian folks are
> the most heavy users of it :) So, while you can submit a bug upstream, I don't think there is a high
> chance anyone picks it up. You can try to ask here:
>    https://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mips-port

I would like to pick it up. However, I am on vacation at the moment
and did not have a mips64el machine on hand. If time permits, I will
return to the company in three days to follow up on this issue.

Cheers,
Ao Qi

>
> It looks to me that Zero mips64el is another instance of SecureDirectoryStream bug tail:
>    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22SecureDirectoryStream%22
>
> If there is the mips64el machine where this reproduces, the next step would be trying the mainline
> JDK NIO tests, something like:
>
>   $ git clone https://github.com/openjdk/jdk
>   $ cd jdk
>   $ wget https://builds.shipilev.net/jtreg/jtreg.zip
>   $ unzip jtreg.zip
>   $ ./configure --with-debug-level=fastdebug --with-jtreg=./jtreg
>   $ make run-test TEST=java/nio
>
> ...and if that does not yield failures, then MCVE would be needed.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100
  Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
    Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 19:00 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el raphael.jolly@free.fr - 2021-02-13 20:30 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 02:00 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 09:40 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> - 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
            Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-15 18:00 +0100
              Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-20 10:10 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-21 21:20 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-28 18:30 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 18:40 +0100

csiph-web