Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12061

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

From Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.ports.mips
Subject Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el
Date 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
Message-ID <BHXQJ-2p7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHOu6-5eX-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[also forwarding to the Debian mips porters]

On 2/12/21 10:26 PM, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> Hello Java Team and OpenJDK Team,
> 
> I'm hesitant to start filing potentially serious bugs at this point in the
> release cycle so please let me know if there's something I'm missing in
> this situation.
> 
> I've been trying to get the bazel-bootstrap package to build on mips64el.
> It's *almost* completing now but it runs into an error when trying to clean
> an output directory.[1] This is using `deleteRecursively` from Guava [2]
> which is supposed to delete files and directories recursively, as the name
> implies. However, it throws an error [3] complaining that the target is a
> directory. This error makes no sense and the code works just fine on all
> other architectures supported by Bazel (amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x,
> ppc64, and riscv64).
> 
> Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

you could try to debug with java -zero / javac -J-zero on amd64.

Matthias

> -Olek
> 
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/blob/olek-mips-riscv-3/src/java_tools/buildjar/java/com/google/devtools/build/buildjar/VanillaJavaBuilder.java#L379
> [2]
> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/guava-libraries/-/blob/master/guava/src/com/google/common/io/MoreFiles.java#L521
> [3]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bazel-bootstrap&arch=mips64el&ver=3.5.1%2Bds-3%7Eexp2&stamp=1612583842&raw=0
> 

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100
  Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
    Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 19:00 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el raphael.jolly@free.fr - 2021-02-13 20:30 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 02:00 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 09:40 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> - 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
            Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-15 18:00 +0100
              Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-20 10:10 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-21 21:20 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-28 18:30 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 18:40 +0100

csiph-web