Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12059
| From | Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el |
| Date | 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BHOu6-5eX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello Java Team and OpenJDK Team, I'm hesitant to start filing potentially serious bugs at this point in the release cycle so please let me know if there's something I'm missing in this situation. I've been trying to get the bazel-bootstrap package to build on mips64el. It's *almost* completing now but it runs into an error when trying to clean an output directory.[1] This is using `deleteRecursively` from Guava [2] which is supposed to delete files and directories recursively, as the name implies. However, it throws an error [3] complaining that the target is a directory. This error makes no sense and the code works just fine on all other architectures supported by Bazel (amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x, ppc64, and riscv64). Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! -Olek [1] https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/blob/olek-mips-riscv-3/src/java_tools/buildjar/java/com/google/devtools/build/buildjar/VanillaJavaBuilder.java#L379 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/guava-libraries/-/blob/master/guava/src/com/google/common/io/MoreFiles.java#L521 [3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bazel-bootstrap&arch=mips64el&ver=3.5.1%2Bds-3%7Eexp2&stamp=1612583842&raw=0
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 19:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el raphael.jolly@free.fr - 2021-02-13 20:30 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 02:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 09:40 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> - 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-15 18:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-20 10:10 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-21 21:20 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-28 18:30 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 18:40 +0100
csiph-web