Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12068

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Thank you all for your inputs and suggestions!

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:

>
> you could try to debug with java -zero / javac -J-zero on amd64.


Done! [1] Unfortunately, I don't see anything useful there but perhaps one
of you will.

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM <raphael.jolly@free.fr> wrote:

> It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el.
>
> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/


Ah, thanks for the explanation! It helped me to appropriately adjust
build-depends. Hmm, it looks like Zero is not supported on MIPS at the
moment, but perhaps that site is just out-of-date?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:56 PM Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com>
wrote:

>
> This seems to indicate that the isDirectory call [4] is getting wrong
> file attributes. Following the trail, those file attributes come from
> a fstatat call [5] which ultimately come from the native stack in
> UnixNativeDispatcher.c [6]. The actual way that fstatat is called
> depends on the build flags and defines from the arch, so somebody with
> better knowledge might want to take a look at UnixNativeDispatcher.c
> [6] and tell if OpenJDK is picking the right function to call for
> mips64el.
>

Thanks for the excellent analysis! So is this indeed a bug in OpenJDK on
mips64el then? I'm happy to file the bug, referencing all of the
information in this thread, if that's the probable culprit here.

-Olek

[1]
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/olekw/32e54c0829d739e8fa88893a853c0fa8/raw/b2fce4d2ab77555a3d28c22441f1de3cb2d99f38/bazel-bootstrap-zero-jre

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100
  Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
    Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 19:00 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el raphael.jolly@free.fr - 2021-02-13 20:30 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 02:00 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 09:40 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> - 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
            Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-15 18:00 +0100
              Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-20 10:10 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-21 21:20 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-28 18:30 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 18:40 +0100

csiph-web