Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12070

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

From Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.ports.mips
Subject Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el
Date 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
Message-ID <BINvY-7Yu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHOu6-5eX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHXQJ-2p7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BI7n4-82x-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BIcZr-2Yw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BIAp7-77-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/15/21 1:40 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM <raphael.jolly@free.fr <mailto:raphael.jolly@free.fr>> wrote:
>     It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el.
>     https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/
> 
> Ah, thanks for the explanation! It helped me to appropriately adjust build-depends. Hmm, it looks 
> like Zero is not supported on MIPS at the moment, but perhaps that site is just out-of-date?

There only Zero on mips64el for all current OpenJDKs. Zero for mips64el should be supported since 
JDK 10, see JDK-8186313: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186313

...so openjdk-11 is supposed to work.

> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:56 PM Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com 
> <mailto:tiago.daitx@canonical.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     This seems to indicate that the isDirectory call [4] is getting wrong
>     file attributes. Following the trail, those file attributes come from
>     a fstatat call [5] which ultimately come from the native stack in
>     UnixNativeDispatcher.c [6]. The actual way that fstatat is called
>     depends on the build flags and defines from the arch, so somebody with
>     better knowledge might want to take a look at UnixNativeDispatcher.c
>     [6] and tell if OpenJDK is picking the right function to call for
>     mips64el.
> 
> 
> Thanks for the excellent analysis! So is this indeed a bug in OpenJDK on mips64el then? I'm happy to 
> file the bug, referencing all of the information in this thread, if that's the probable culpritĀ here.

Thing is, there is hardly anyone who supports mips64el in OpenJDK upstream. I think Debian folks are 
the most heavy users of it :) So, while you can submit a bug upstream, I don't think there is a high 
chance anyone picks it up. You can try to ask here:
   https://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mips-port

It looks to me that Zero mips64el is another instance of SecureDirectoryStream bug tail:
   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22SecureDirectoryStream%22

If there is the mips64el machine where this reproduces, the next step would be trying the mainline 
JDK NIO tests, something like:

  $ git clone https://github.com/openjdk/jdk
  $ cd jdk
  $ wget https://builds.shipilev.net/jtreg/jtreg.zip
  $ unzip jtreg.zip
  $ ./configure --with-debug-level=fastdebug --with-jtreg=./jtreg
  $ make run-test TEST=java/nio

...and if that does not yield failures, then MCVE would be needed.

-- 
Thanks,
-Aleksey

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100
  Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
    Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 19:00 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el raphael.jolly@free.fr - 2021-02-13 20:30 +0100
      Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
        Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 02:00 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 09:40 +0100
          Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> - 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
            Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-15 18:00 +0100
              Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-20 10:10 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-21 21:20 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-28 18:30 +0100
                Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 18:40 +0100

csiph-web