Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12070
| From | Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.ports.mips |
| Subject | Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el |
| Date | 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BINvY-7Yu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BHOu6-5eX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHXQJ-2p7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BI7n4-82x-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BIcZr-2Yw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BIAp7-77-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2/15/21 1:40 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM <raphael.jolly@free.fr <mailto:raphael.jolly@free.fr>> wrote: > It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el. > https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/ > > Ah, thanks for the explanation! It helped me to appropriately adjust build-depends. Hmm, it looks > like Zero is not supported on MIPS at the moment, but perhaps that site is just out-of-date? There only Zero on mips64el for all current OpenJDKs. Zero for mips64el should be supported since JDK 10, see JDK-8186313: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186313 ...so openjdk-11 is supposed to work. > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:56 PM Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com > <mailto:tiago.daitx@canonical.com>> wrote: > > > This seems to indicate that the isDirectory call [4] is getting wrong > file attributes. Following the trail, those file attributes come from > a fstatat call [5] which ultimately come from the native stack in > UnixNativeDispatcher.c [6]. The actual way that fstatat is called > depends on the build flags and defines from the arch, so somebody with > better knowledge might want to take a look at UnixNativeDispatcher.c > [6] and tell if OpenJDK is picking the right function to call for > mips64el. > > > Thanks for the excellent analysis! So is this indeed a bug in OpenJDK on mips64el then? I'm happy to > file the bug, referencing all of the information in this thread, if that's the probable culpritĀ here. Thing is, there is hardly anyone who supports mips64el in OpenJDK upstream. I think Debian folks are the most heavy users of it :) So, while you can submit a bug upstream, I don't think there is a high chance anyone picks it up. You can try to ask here: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mips-port It looks to me that Zero mips64el is another instance of SecureDirectoryStream bug tail: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22SecureDirectoryStream%22 If there is the mips64el machine where this reproduces, the next step would be trying the mainline JDK NIO tests, something like: $ git clone https://github.com/openjdk/jdk $ cd jdk $ wget https://builds.shipilev.net/jtreg/jtreg.zip $ unzip jtreg.zip $ ./configure --with-debug-level=fastdebug --with-jtreg=./jtreg $ make run-test TEST=java/nio ...and if that does not yield failures, then MCVE would be needed. -- Thanks, -Aleksey
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 22:50 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 08:50 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 19:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el raphael.jolly@free.fr - 2021-02-13 20:30 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2021-02-14 01:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 02:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-15 09:40 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com> - 2021-02-15 16:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-15 18:00 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Ao Qi <aoqi@loongson.cn> - 2021-02-20 10:10 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-21 21:20 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-02-28 18:30 +0100
Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 18:40 +0100
csiph-web