Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > de.sci.physik > #134919
| From | Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | de.sci.physik |
| Subject | Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' |
| Date | 2020-10-16 12:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <huta8tFmt8iU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (23 earlier) <hus02pFemq5U1@mid.individual.net> <husnnrFj6c6U1@mid.individual.net> <hut47mFll35U1@mid.individual.net> <hut5atFlqndU1@mid.individual.net> <rmbn6q$c9c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Am 16.10.20 um 10:55 Uhr Sebastian Wolf schrieb: > Am 16.10.2020 um 10:53 schrieb Kurt: >> Am 16.10.2020 um 10:33 schrieb Erika Ciesla: >>> Am 16.10.20 um 07:01 Uhr Kurt schrieb: >>> >>> >>>> Tatsächlich, also nicht abergläubig sondern aussergläubig. >>>> Naja, hauptsache gläubig. >>>> >>>> Welchen Gott hast du dir ausgesucht bzw. andrehen lassen müsse >>> >>> ? >> >> Nachdem wie du dich hier zeigst muss ich (d)eine "Gottheit" irgendwie >> beleidigt haben. >> Anders ist dein Verhalten mir gegenüber nicht erklärbar. > > Es ist durch deine wirren Wahnvorstellungen bereits erklärt. Das ist korrekt. Gestern, zum Beispiel, hat er behauptet, es hätte den Urknall nicht gegeben. Dies zu glauben ist erlaubt, das ist sein Recht, aber was ist daran seriös? Kann man mit so einem Heiopei noch ordentlich kommunizieren? Oder muß man einfach irgend wann mal einsehen, daß der Idiot immer gewinnt, da dieser sich an keine Regeln halten muß? Die Urknall-Theorie ist gut begründet, sie ist plausibel und sie widerspricht den uns bereits bekannten Naturgesetzen nicht. Wie jede wissenschaftliche Theorie, so ist auch die Urknall-Theorie falsifizierbar (es muß erlaubt sein sie zu widerlegen), doch ist dies bisher noch nicht erfolgt – also gilt sie, so lange wir es nicht besser wissen. Wer dies anders sieht, der tut Recht, scheidet aber aus. Also? Kurt, you are fired! ✌️ 𝓔𝓻𝓲𝓴𝓪 𝓒𝓲𝓮𝓼𝓵𝓪 😷 PS. Der Hypothese eines Gottes bedarf ich für diese Erkenntnis nicht!
Back to de.sci.physik | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-12 17:25 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-12 21:13 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-13 02:19 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 08:19 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-13 10:07 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 10:57 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-13 11:12 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-13 11:34 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 12:43 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-13 12:50 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-13 16:10 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 23:07 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-13 21:44 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 22:59 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-14 00:17 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 08:22 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-14 08:41 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-14 09:39 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2020-10-14 17:18 +0800
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-14 22:22 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 23:18 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-15 01:30 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-15 08:58 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-15 15:46 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-15 18:50 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 00:16 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 07:01 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 10:33 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 10:53 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-16 10:55 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 12:17 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-16 12:42 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' "Dieter Grosch" <dgrosch@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 15:14 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 15:31 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Fritz <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2020-10-16 18:44 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-16 11:38 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 11:48 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 12:16 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 12:19 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika von Schräg-Gegenüber <dummy@dummy.invalid> - 2020-10-16 12:40 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Fritz <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2020-10-16 18:45 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 23:12 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 23:11 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-15 01:27 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-15 08:52 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-15 09:20 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-15 11:15 +0200
Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 07:13 +0200
csiph-web