Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'

From	Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	de.sci.physik
Subject	Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
Date	2020-10-16 12:42 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<5F8978FE.8F309A12@yahoo.com> (permalink)
References	(22 earlier) <husnnrFj6c6U1@mid.individual.net> <hut47mFll35U1@mid.individual.net> <hut5atFlqndU1@mid.individual.net> <rmbn6q$c9c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <huta8tFmt8iU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Erika Ciesla wrote:
> 
> Am 16.10.20 um 10:55 Uhr Sebastian Wolf schrieb:
> > Am 16.10.2020 um 10:53 schrieb Kurt:
> >> Am 16.10.2020 um 10:33 schrieb Erika Ciesla:
> >>> Am 16.10.20 um 07:01 Uhr Kurt schrieb:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Tatsächlich, also nicht abergläubig sondern aussergläubig.
> >>>> Naja, hauptsache gläubig.
> >>>>
> >>>> Welchen Gott hast du dir ausgesucht bzw. andrehen lassen müsse
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>
> >> Nachdem wie du dich hier zeigst muss ich (d)eine "Gottheit" irgendwie
> >> beleidigt haben.
> >> Anders ist dein Verhalten mir gegenüber nicht erklärbar.
> >
> > Es ist durch deine wirren Wahnvorstellungen bereits erklärt.
> 
> Das ist korrekt.
> 
> Gestern, zum Beispiel, hat er behauptet, es hätte den Urknall nicht gegeben.
> Dies zu glauben ist erlaubt, das ist sein Recht, aber was ist daran seriös?
> Kann man mit so einem Heiopei noch ordentlich kommunizieren? Oder muß man
> einfach irgend wann mal einsehen, daß der Idiot immer gewinnt, da dieser sich
> an keine Regeln halten muß?
> 
> Die Urknall-Theorie ist gut begründet, sie ist plausibel und sie widerspricht
> den uns bereits bekannten Naturgesetzen nicht. 

Doch tut sie, aber das stoert offenbar nicht...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Inflation_and_baryogenesis
------
At some point, an unknown reaction called baryogenesis violated the 
conservation of baryon number,leading to a very small excess of quarks 
and leptons over antiquarks and antileptons - of the order of one part 
in 30 million. This resulted in the predominance of matter over 
antimatter in the present universe.
------


> Wie jede wissenschaftliche
> Theorie, so ist auch die Urknall-Theorie falsifizierbar (es muß erlaubt sein
> sie zu widerlegen), doch ist dies bisher noch nicht erfolgt ? also gilt sie,
> so lange wir es nicht besser wissen. Wer dies anders sieht, der tut Recht,
> scheidet aber aus.
> 
> Also?

Fred Hoyle ist 2001 ausgeschieden, durch Tod, aber ist das ein Argument ?

Back to de.sci.physik | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-12 17:25 +0200
  Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-12 21:13 +0200
    Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-13 02:19 +0200
      Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 08:19 +0200
        Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-13 10:07 +0200
          Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 10:57 +0200
            Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-13 11:12 +0200
            Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-13 11:34 +0200
              Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 12:43 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-13 12:50 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-13 16:10 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 23:07 +0200
        Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-13 21:44 +0200
          Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-13 22:59 +0200
            Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-14 00:17 +0200
              Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 08:22 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-14 08:41 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-14 09:39 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2020-10-14 17:18 +0800
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-14 22:22 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 23:18 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-15 01:30 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-15 08:58 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-15 15:46 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-15 18:50 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 00:16 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 07:01 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 10:33 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 10:53 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-16 10:55 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 12:17 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-16 12:42 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' "Dieter Grosch" <dgrosch@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 15:14 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 15:31 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Fritz <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2020-10-16 18:44 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-16 11:38 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 11:48 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 12:16 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-16 12:19 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika von Schräg-Gegenüber <dummy@dummy.invalid> - 2020-10-16 12:40 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Fritz <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2020-10-16 18:45 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 23:12 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-14 23:11 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Erika Ciesla <abc@xyz.invalid> - 2020-10-15 01:27 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-15 08:52 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Sebastian Wolf <invalid@invalid.net> - 2020-10-15 09:20 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-15 11:15 +0200
                Re: annotated version of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' Kurt <kurt.bindl@t-online.de> - 2020-10-16 07:13 +0200

csiph-web