Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105836
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-29 15:02 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzgmm20njs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <op.yze97yayjs98qf@red.lan> <D5290281.A22CB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oe0daq$d55$1@dont-email.me> <op.yzff97dljs98qf@red.lan> <D5291795.A22F6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:00:21 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/28/17, 3:47 PM, in article op.yzff97dljs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > > ... >>>>> The problem with the anti-racist left wing morons of today is they require >>>>> companies to employ the correct numbers of each race and sex, regardless of >>>>> how well they will do at the job. For fuck's sake let the companies employ >>>>> who they think will do best. >>>> >>>> First: there is NOTHING wrong with being against racism. >>> >>> Then there should be NOTHING *wrong* with being for it. >>> >>>> >>>> Second: you are confusing supporting equal rights in general with supporting >>>> a form of affirmative action. The two are not the same. >>> >>> Everyone knows that. >>> Affirmative action is racism. >> >> Snit ain't caucasian is he? > > I sincerely do not know if I am or if I am not, Impossible. > which some people have told me is functionally equivalent to being so. > > But regardless of race, I am very much pro equal rights and against special > entitlements. I also understand, though, that it is not always black and > white, such as with the question of affirmative action. I am not for it but > I can see where good people would be. But the naïveté of the special > snow-flake common worldview of "just don't break the law and work hard and > things will go well for you" is not something I can support. NOT that I do > not support (largely) following the law and working hard (I do) but the idea > that this somehow fixes the issues we face is clearly very, very naïve. What I'm against is companies having to employ say 15% blacks because the local population is 15% black. Blacks will be good at different jobs than whites, so making every company have the "correct" percentage is insane. -- Why were so many niggers killed in the Vietnam war?? Because when the sergeant said to "get down", they all got up and started dancing.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 21:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 23:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 22:49 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 10:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:07 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 12:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 15:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 18:32 -0700
csiph-web