Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105785

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:30:25 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
> On 4/28/17, 1:37 PM, in article op.yze97yayjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>>> Did you read my comments, above? I talked about this challenge. If you have
>>>>> a good solution for it I would love to hear it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I do think we can look at those who are from poor neighborhoods and work to
>>>>> equalize things there ... black, white, or green, does not matter.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And stop funding school districts with property taxes... that is stupid and
>>>>> leads to problems that last for generations.
>>>>> 
>>>> clearly, he wants to keep his "unequal" rights intact AKA "white privilege".
>>>> 
>>> Hell! Working with, and for me before I retired there were Whites, Blacks,
>>> Hispanics, Puerto Ricans, Filipinos, Koreans, Vietnamese, Samoans, Chinese,
>>> Japanese, one Pakistani, men, women, straights & gays of both sexes,
>>> religious faithful (normal Christian, off the wall crazy Christian, Jews,
>>> Muslims, & Budhists), athiests, good workers, and mediocre workers from
>>> across the ethnicity spectrum.
>>> 
>>> Among that American melting pot of co-workers you could find decent folks and
>>> total assholes, race knows no boundaries.
>>> 
>> The problem with the anti-racist left wing morons of today is they require
>> companies to employ the correct numbers of each race and sex, regardless of
>> how well they will do at the job.  For fuck's sake let the companies employ
>> who they think will do best.
>
> First: there is NOTHING wrong with being against racism.

Then there should be NOTHING *wrong* with being for it.

>
> Second: you are confusing supporting equal rights in general with supporting
> a form of affirmative action. The two are not the same.
>

Everyone knows that.
Affirmative action is racism.

-- 
SpringSprangSprung

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:37 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:30 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 21:48 +0000
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 23:47 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 22:49 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:01 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:00 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:02 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 10:42 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:07 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 12:23 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 15:51 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:00 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:10 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:34 +0000
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 18:32 -0700

csiph-web