Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-28 18:32 -0700
Message-ID	<D5293B48.A2330%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(22 earlier) <oe0daq$d55$1@dont-email.me> <D529156A.A22EA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oe0hja$qf7$2@dont-email.me> <D52919DF.A2303%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oe0jib$vmk$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/28/17, 4:34 PM, in article oe0jib$vmk$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:10:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 4/28/17, 4:00 PM, in article oe0hja$qf7$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> ... 
>>>>>>> The problem with the anti-racist left wing morons of today is they
>>>>>>> require
>>>>>>> companies to employ the correct numbers of each race and sex, regardless
>>>>>>> of how well they will do at the job.  For fuck's sake let the companies
>>>>>>> employ who they think will do best.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> First: there is NOTHING wrong with being against racism.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then there should be NOTHING *wrong* with being for it.
>>>> 
>>>> Well, it is the ultimate "snowflake" worldview... you can decide for
>>>> yourself if that is good or bad. For me: bad. Period.
>>> 
>>> Remember... you're the snowflake.
>>> Wrong is bad?
>>> So Right is good?
>>> Careful, liberal, you'll loose your invitation to the next climate change
>>> seminar.
>> 
>> I am the one who argues for equal rights. How do you see that as being a
>> "snowflake"? 
> 
> Liberals are the snowflakes.

Ah, so you just are posting for attention and have no examples of ME being a
snowflake in any way. Got it.

In other words: you are being a special snowflake who thinks you deserve
attention without offering anything of value.

...
>> Quote where you think I said or implied that? Or are you just trolling for
>> attention. 
> 
> Read your own damn posts.
> You save, organize, and regurgitate them.

Ah, you think you are a special snowflake who thinks the burden of proof
does not apply to you. Got it!
 
>> Character is all that matters.
>>> Being a liberal fish, you'll bite any hook in the water.
>> 
>> Other than noting you want attention do you have a point? I think it is
>> pretty clear the answer is "no" but I am willing to listen.
> 
> I made my points.
> Looks like you're getting skunked. :)

Well, you are not the biggest snowflake I have run into, but clearly you
think you are one. As quoted, above.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:37 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:30 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 21:48 +0000
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 23:47 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 22:49 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:01 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:00 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:02 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 10:42 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:07 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 12:23 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 15:51 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:00 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:10 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:34 +0000
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 18:32 -0700

csiph-web