Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-28 23:34 +0000
Organization	Spring,Sprang,Sprung
Message-ID	<oe0jib$vmk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(21 earlier) <D5290281.A22CB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oe0daq$d55$1@dont-email.me> <D529156A.A22EA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oe0hja$qf7$2@dont-email.me> <D52919DF.A2303%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:10:07 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
> On 4/28/17, 4:00 PM, in article oe0hja$qf7$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>
> ... 
>>>>>> The problem with the anti-racist left wing morons of today is they require
>>>>>> companies to employ the correct numbers of each race and sex, regardless
>>>>>> of how well they will do at the job.  For fuck's sake let the companies
>>>>>> employ who they think will do best.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> First: there is NOTHING wrong with being against racism.
>>>> 
>>>> Then there should be NOTHING *wrong* with being for it.
>>> 
>>> Well, it is the ultimate "snowflake" worldview... you can decide for
>>> yourself if that is good or bad. For me: bad. Period.
>> 
>> Remember... you're the snowflake.
>> Wrong is bad?
>> So Right is good?
>> Careful, liberal, you'll loose your invitation to the next climate change
>> seminar.
>
> I am the one who argues for equal rights. How do you see that as being a
> "snowflake"? 

Liberals are the snowflakes.

>
>>>>> Second: you are confusing supporting equal rights in general with
>>>>> supporting
>>>>> a form of affirmative action. The two are not the same.
>>>> 
>>>> Everyone knows that.
>>>> Affirmative action is racism.
>>> 
>>> I personally am not a fan of it but I can understand the ideals behind it...
>>> namely working to correct clear societal disadvantages. I do not have a
>>> great solution to that problem but do support working to equalize education,
>>> etc. and understand that it is multi-generational "fix" that will never be
>>> perfect (and cannot be). What I disagree with is people who are so blind as
>>> to the plight of others or the impact of history that they foolishly deny
>>> their even is an impact or who deny that many minorities are still facing
>>> significant racism today. That goes back to the "snowflake" mentality which
>>> I do not support.
>> 
>> I don't judge based on skin colour, as you do.
>
> Quote where you think I said or implied that? Or are you just trolling for
> attention.
>

Read your own damn posts.
You save, organize, and regurgitate them.

>> Character is all that matters.
>> Being a liberal fish, you'll bite any hook in the water.
>
> Other than noting you want attention do you have a point? I think it is
> pretty clear the answer is "no" but I am willing to listen.
>

I made my points.
Looks like you're getting skunked. :)

-- 
SpringSprangSprung

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:37 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:30 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 21:48 +0000
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 23:47 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 22:49 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:01 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:00 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 15:02 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 10:42 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:07 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 12:23 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 15:51 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:00 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 16:10 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-28 23:34 +0000
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 18:32 -0700

csiph-web