Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling

Date	Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:35:56 -0500
From	Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.sys.intel
Subject	Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling
References	<4ebb79bd$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <u5dic7hif1ad694nmq30p32env18grijn2@4ax.com> <4ed076ed$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <a6l2d71tmlob774vm7c8vsou4kui29hv2j@4ax.com> <4ed3449f$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <q657d7131md3g79s8mqqkgovgd7tsum6mh@4ax.com> <4ed439e3$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <4eda21a6$1@x-privat.org>
In-Reply-To	<4eda21a6$1@x-privat.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host	24.52.238.84
Message-ID	<4edcf2f0@news.bnb-lp.com> (permalink)
X-Trace	news.bnb-lp.com 1323102960 24.52.238.84 (5 Dec 2011 11:36:00 -0400)
Organization	Send abuse or DMCA complaints to abuse@bnb-lp.com
Lines	26
X-Authenticated-User	vfa100
X-DMCA-Complaints	Send abuse or DMCA complaints to abuse@bnb-lp.com
X-DMCA-Complaints	The subject line should contain only the 4 letters DMCA
Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news.bnb-lp.com!not-for-mail
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.intel:154

Show key headers only | View raw

On 03/12/2011 8:18 AM, Orson Cart wrote:
> Yousuf Khan<bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>  wrote:
>>
>> No, but I'm also not in the market for any sort of aftermarket cooling
>>
>> system either. I figure by the time I'm ready to go there, I'll be
>> able
>> to really research it. Both AMD and Intel are now offering water-cooling
>>
>> on their next-gen processors. Also I got a pretty decent full-tower
>>
>> case, just upgraded last year, which already has holes drilled in
>> for
>> water-cooling pipes.
>>
>>
> What took them so long? I recall years ago a Pentium D 3.4 GHz, that was amazingly
> rated at 95 W TDP. Yet the Intel cooler was maximum RPM within 90 seconds of
> booting. Surely they needed better cooling way back then.

I think they were able to hang onto the traditional cooling systems 
longer with the advance of internal CPU thermal control circuitry. The 
processors wouldn't get to high temperatures until they were really 
pushed for power.

	Yousuf Khan

Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 02:14 -0500
  Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-11-10 13:24 +0100
    Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 14:50 -0500
  Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-20 11:17 -0600
    Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-26 00:19 -0500
      Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-26 15:59 -0600
        Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 03:21 -0500
          Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-28 08:40 -0600
            Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 20:48 -0500
              Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-12-03 14:18 +0100
                Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-12-05 11:35 -0500

csiph-web