Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.intel > #147
| Date | 2011-11-28 20:48 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips, comp.sys.intel |
| Subject | Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling |
| References | (1 earlier) <u5dic7hif1ad694nmq30p32env18grijn2@4ax.com> <4ed076ed$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <a6l2d71tmlob774vm7c8vsou4kui29hv2j@4ax.com> <4ed3449f$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <q657d7131md3g79s8mqqkgovgd7tsum6mh@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <4ed439e3$1@news.bnb-lp.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Send abuse or DMCA complaints to abuse@bnb-lp.com |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 28/11/2011 9:40 AM, willbill wrote: > Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:21:50 -0500, Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> On 26/11/2011 4:59 PM, willbill wrote: > >>> I'm running Phenom II X4 955 BE, so for me >>> it's not likely to be much of an upgrade. >> >> Also what I think. Perhaps, a Bulldozer 8xxx series would be much more >> noticeable too you: 4 modules/8 cores in AMD terminology, 4 cores/8 >> threads in generic terminology. > > Interesting thought. I'm not likely to spend the money > for either of the 8 core FX cpus, but I'll start paying > some attention to pricing of the 6 core FX cpu. > > Your buy of a 6 core Phenom II X6 1100T BE suggests > that you either run multi-threaded apps, or think that > this will pick up in the near future? You don't need individual highly multi-threaded apps to take advantage of the threading. Just running Windows, you always have several things running simultaneously. I've gone from single-core to dual-core triple core, to currently hexa-core, and system responsiveness always gets smoother with the more cores/threads you have. I found double-core used to get heavily bogged down easily under Windows. Triple-core was much more tamed, but still it would've been nice to have at least one more core available. And now of course, I got 3 more cores. I expect I won't be maxing that out for a couple of years yet. >> I'm thinking that with the current processor that I have, if I do decide >> to replace the stock cooler, then I'll go with a water cooler right off >> the bat. > > Whoa! There's a jump into the deep end. :) > > Given you've zero experience with after-market > air coolers, have you got a ref that makes a case > for water cooling over air cooling? I'm mainly > talking money/performance/convenience ratio > as that seems to be a key interest of yours. No, but I'm also not in the market for any sort of aftermarket cooling system either. I figure by the time I'm ready to go there, I'll be able to really research it. Both AMD and Intel are now offering water-cooling on their next-gen processors. Also I got a pretty decent full-tower case, just upgraded last year, which already has holes drilled in for water-cooling pipes. Yousuf Khan
Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 02:14 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-11-10 13:24 +0100
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-10 14:50 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-20 11:17 -0600
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-26 00:19 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-26 15:59 -0600
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 03:21 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling willbill <postonNG@postonNG.net> - 2011-11-28 08:40 -0600
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-11-28 20:48 -0500
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-12-03 14:18 +0100
Re: A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2011-12-05 11:35 -0500
csiph-web